Is it me or has Old Salt lost it?

Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...

>On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:45:41 +0100, Steve 'the hipclone' Williams
><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>>Have a nice day :)
>>>
>>>He means the goon with the sig line of a 4 year old.
>>
>>And a shafted picture of a skull-type thingy isn't?
>>
>Just what do you *think* the word "shafted" means?
>For your info: I have skulls all over the place. The shift knob on one
>of my cars is a chrome skull. I have lamps that resemble a stack of
>skulls that light up inside. Posters, clothing, science specimens etc.
>I love skulls, and I'm dying to see yours.

Die quietly.  TIA.

>>>It says something about Texas, and there's some fucked up, broke-assed
>>>ASCII that I'm afraid is supposed to resemble the great state of
>>>Texas.  That's an ass kicking right off the bat.
>>
>>I see you haven't met the 'fixed pitch font' yet, have you?
>>
>I'll tell you what I *haven't* met yet, and that's *anybody* using
>ASCII in their sigs, that knows how to format it to display correctly.

HAHAHAHAHA.

Shall we tell him, or make him jump through some more hoops first?

>Anybody can create a bullshit picture, word, or phrase, but I have yet
>to see *anybody* other than myself, that can reformat it so that
>somebody might be able to read what it's supposed to be.

HAHAHA.  Crossposted so that the ascii-artists can read this...

> I'm sure there's millions of people out there that know how to do
>ASCII *properly*, but they seem to avoid my detection.
> I can supply some links if you'd like to help all these ASCII
>*artists* stop posting fragmented, broken and deformed *art*.
>
>>Neither has Baby Matthew [groups added]
>>
>But not to forget Warren [groups deleted]
>
>>>Then the * ASCII* (for lack of a better term) is filled with his gay
>>>*Spank* list. <yawn>
>>
>>I suggest you look up the definition of "spank" (with regard Usenet.)
>>
>You should take that suggestion and twist it up really tight, and then

Like you twist people's words, amongst other things that you like to twist...

>cram it, our little spanking post.
>
>>>People that have to show off their trophies, seem to always have
>>>something to prove, instead of something to show.
>>>A true warrior doesn't display trophies.
>>>A true warrior chokes your rivers with your dead.
>>
>>Oh like you'd know...
>Again, your words are like daggers.
>Take care

Et toi.

>--
>   __   ___                __                      
>  /   |/    (_)__    ___/ /_______  ___  _   ___ 
> / /|_/ /  /  _  \/ _   /  __/ __/ // /    '  \/  -_)
>/_/  //_/_//_/\_,_/\__/_/  \_, /_/_/_/\__/ 
>                                         /___/            
>Min...@the-order.com
>Dangerous in my silence
>Deadly to my cause
>Shegure gur pnhfr, obl. Lrf, lbh xabj gur tnzr.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________________
                                                 ____  _
On Sabu424's Name and Shame List Of Dishonour   / ___|| |_ _____   _____
http://jillscott.tripod.com/sabu424v4.html      \___ \| __/ _ \ \ / / _ \
                             __        ___ _ _ _ ___) | ||  __/\ V /  __/
Empire of APDD               \ \      / (_) | (_)____/ \__\___| \_/_\___|
d00d #5t3vi3-b0y              \ \ /\ / /| | | | |/ _` | '_ ` _ \/ __|
                               \ V  V / | | | | | (_| | | | | | \__ \
The really interesting d00d     \_/\_/  |_|_|_|_|\__,_|_| |_| |_|___/
_________________________________________________________________________

Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...

>On Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:18:57 +0100, Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams
><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>>Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
>>
>>>On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:45:41 +0100, Steve 'the hipclone' Williams
>>><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>>>>Have a nice day :)
>>>>>
>>>>>He means the goon with the sig line of a 4 year old.
>>>>
>>>>And a shafted picture of a skull-type thingy isn't?
>>>>
>>>Just what do you *think* the word "shafted" means?
>>>For your info: I have skulls all over the place. The shift knob on one
>>>of my cars is a chrome skull. I have lamps that resemble a stack of
>>>skulls that light up inside. Posters, clothing, science specimens etc.
>>>I love skulls, and I'm dying to see yours.
>>
>>Die quietly.  TIA.
>>
>>>>>It says something about Texas, and there's some fucked up, broke-assed
>>>>>ASCII that I'm afraid is supposed to resemble the great state of
>>>>>Texas.  That's an ass kicking right off the bat.
>>>>
>>>>I see you haven't met the 'fixed pitch font' yet, have you?
>>>>
>>>I'll tell you what I *haven't* met yet, and that's *anybody* using
>>>ASCII in their sigs, that knows how to format it to display correctly.
>>
>>HAHAHAHAHA.
>>
>>Shall we tell him, or make him jump through some more hoops first?
>>
>>>Anybody can create a bullshit picture, word, or phrase, but I have yet
>>>to see *anybody* other than myself, that can reformat it so that
>>>somebody might be able to read what it's supposed to be.
>>
>>HAHAHA.  Crossposted so that the ascii-artists can read this...
>
>You see, you took that passage as meaning there's nobody on the planet
>that can format ASCII, other than me.  You're twisting the intent of

Point is, is that your ascii 'art' isn't formatted correctly.

http://storage.ourdomain.cjb.net/fuckhead.jpg

If it was it would display properly in the fixed pitch font.

HINT: ASCII art is supposed to be displayed properly in fixed pitch font,
favoured over the variable pitched font, it may look OK in the var-pitch you
type your messages in but it'll look completely different in some other vp
font.

>the words to suit your response.  I have never been to an ASCII
>related newsgroup. I suppose everyone in those groups can do it, but I

Yes.  They can do it properly.  At least I think they can.

>was talking about the rest of Usenet. I have a large list of groups
>(non ascii) that I hang out in, but I have *never* seen anyone in
>those groups format properly.  It is funny how you crossposted to *get
>me in trouble* with the ascii guys, but I don't think "Mindcryme" or
>"Mister Scary" really care much for posting in their groups anyway.
>It's too bad I couldn't use a different name if I ever chose to post
>there.  Oh well.
>
>>> I'm sure there's millions of people out there that know how to do
>>>ASCII *properly*, but they seem to avoid my detection.
>>> I can supply some links if you'd like to help all these ASCII
>>>*artists* stop posting fragmented, broken and deformed *art*.
>
> As you can see, I explained it already.

So have I.

>The problem is that you don't seem to pay attention.

You are embarassing yourself in front of the Romathians, receive a clue or
dont bother doing ASCII-art.

HTH.

Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams (ste...@bigfoot.com) wrote:
: Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
<snip>
: >>
: >>>>>It says something about Texas, and there's some fucked up, broke-assed
: >>>>>ASCII that I'm afraid is supposed to resemble the great state of
: >>>>>Texas.  That's an ass kicking right off the bat.
: >>>>
: >>>>I see you haven't met the 'fixed pitch font' yet, have you?
: >>>>
: >>>I'll tell you what I *haven't* met yet, and that's *anybody* using
: >>>ASCII in their sigs, that knows how to format it to display correctly.
<snip>
: If it was it would display properly in the fixed pitch font.

: HINT: ASCII art is supposed to be displayed properly in fixed pitch font,
: favoured over the variable pitched font, it may look OK in the var-pitch you
: type your messages in but it'll look completely different in some other vp
: font.

: >the words to suit your response.  I have never been to an ASCII
: >related newsgroup. I suppose everyone in those groups can do it, but I
<snip>
: >
: > As you can see, I explained it already.

: So have I.

: >The problem is that you don't seem to pay attention.

: You are embarassing yourself in front of the Romathians, receive a clue or
: dont bother doing ASCII-art.

--> Do I understand this correctly?  Some moron named Steve thinks
    that ASCII art - that is traditionally done with non-proportional
    fonts (fixed-width fonts); because it doesn't look right on his
    graphical, variable, proportional, font displaying screen; thinks
    that thousands of people who've been doing this stuff for years;
    are WRONG, just because the stuff doesn't look right to him?  And
    that he is the only `smart' one that can adjust font size/width,
    so that the ASCII art `looks' right on his screen?  How perfectly
    pathetic, short-sighted, ill-advised, stupid and brainless he is.

    LEARN about ASCII-art and its' history before you pass judgement,
    on something you obviously know nothing about.  This stuff was
    being done on university main-frames back in the late 60s (wish
    I'd kept that `Snoopy calendar' printout, dammit!) and sent to
    clunky dot-matrix printers; then pinned-up in labs, halls & dorms.

    Steve - you are an immature, self-centered, clueless jerk. LEARN
    something before you open your big mouth and put your keyboard
    in it.  Anyone can take an ASCII doodle and make it look good on
    a GUI-based screen.  ASCII art has a history that's older (and
    obviously MUCH smarter) than you are.  Get a grip.  Get a life.

--
E.A.G.L.E Librarian A3 BBS:403/481-3133  email:ttu...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca

Ere, get a load of dis ttu...@ecn.ab.ca (), oo wrote...

>Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams (ste...@bigfoot.com) wrote:
>: Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
><snip>
>: >>
>: >>>>>It says something about Texas, and there's some fucked up, broke-assed
>: >>>>>ASCII that I'm afraid is supposed to resemble the great state of
>: >>>>>Texas.  That's an ass kicking right off the bat.
>: >>>>
>: >>>>I see you haven't met the 'fixed pitch font' yet, have you?
>: >>>>
>: >>>I'll tell you what I *haven't* met yet, and that's *anybody* using
>: >>>ASCII in their sigs, that knows how to format it to display correctly.
><snip>
>: If it was it would display properly in the fixed pitch font.
>
>: HINT: ASCII art is supposed to be displayed properly in fixed pitch font,
>: favoured over the variable pitched font, it may look OK in the var-pitch you
>: type your messages in but it'll look completely different in some other vp
>: font.
>
>: >the words to suit your response.  I have never been to an ASCII
>: >related newsgroup. I suppose everyone in those groups can do it, but I
><snip>
>: >
>: > As you can see, I explained it already.
>
>: So have I.
>
>: >The problem is that you don't seem to pay attention.
>
>: You are embarassing yourself in front of the Romathians, receive a clue or
>: dont bother doing ASCII-art.
>
>--> Do I understand this correctly?  Some moron named Steve thinks
>    that ASCII art - that is traditionally done with non-proportional
>    fonts (fixed-width fonts); because it doesn't look right on his
>    graphical, variable, proportional, font displaying screen; thinks
>    that thousands of people who've been doing this stuff for years;
>    are WRONG, just because the stuff doesn't look right to him?  And

No.  You are thinking of Mindcryme.  He is under the impression that ASCII
art is to be viewed in his personal choice of font (MS Sans Serif) and that
art written to be viewed in this font is correctly formatted, and the art
written to be viewed in the, indeed proper, font is incorrect.

I'm sorry I did not make this clearer.

>    that he is the only `smart' one that can adjust font size/width,
>    so that the ASCII art `looks' right on his screen?  How perfectly
>    pathetic, short-sighted, ill-advised, stupid and brainless he is.
>
>    LEARN about ASCII-art and its' history before you pass judgement,
>    on something you obviously know nothing about.  This stuff was
>    being done on university main-frames back in the late 60s (wish
>    I'd kept that `Snoopy calendar' printout, dammit!) and sent to
>    clunky dot-matrix printers; then pinned-up in labs, halls & dorms.
>
>    Steve - you are an immature, self-centered, clueless jerk. LEARN
>    something before you open your big mouth and put your keyboard

Ooooh.  Strop.

>    in it.  Anyone can take an ASCII doodle and make it look good on
>    a GUI-based screen.  ASCII art has a history that's older (and
>    obviously MUCH smarter) than you are.  Get a grip.  Get a life.

You are talking to the wrong person, but yu wont get a chance, he's too
scared to crosspost out of AFJR.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________________
                      ____  _
                     / ___|| |_ _____   _____
                     \___ \| __/ _ \ \ / / _ \
  __        ___ _ _ _ ___) | ||  __/\ V /  __/
  \ \      / (_) | (_)____/ \__\___| \_/_\___|
   \ \ /\ / /| | | | |/ _` | '_ ` _ \/ __|
    \ V  V / | | | | | (_| | | | | | \__ \
     \_/\_/  |_|_|_|_|\__,_|_| |_| |_|___/   The really interesting d00d.
_________________________________________________________________________

[ Empire of APDD d00d: #573v13-80y ] [Empire of AFSW d00d: #7h3-r00l3r ]

[ http://kooks.ourdomain.cjb.net ] [ http://steve.ourdomain.cjb.net ]
_________________________________________________________________________

"I AM NOT A WOMAN!"
-- In <956...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths makes
an excellent use of irony.

"I'm a year 8"
-- In <957...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths reveals
the reason why he is such an arrogant, and stupid person.

"THIS STOPS HERE AND NOW!!!!"
-- In <957...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths spoils
our fun when faced with his first experience of Usenet Performance Art.

http://www.geocities.com/doh_nz/
_________________________________________________________________________

"wow you are so tough"
-- In <l7j...@4ax.com> Nick King almost
manages to reach an orgasm over how tough Fred Ziffel is.

http://afjr.ourdomain.cjb.net/king.html
_________________________________________________________________________

"I have no reason to report you."
-- In <Kqf15.16819$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
finally makes a post to Usenet without netkkkopping anyone

"This "Richard" you refer to.  He maintains he's not a pedophile"
-- In <TFW15.35426$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
takes the words of a confessed pedo in denial like Gospel

"I AM NOT DUMB.  If I was, I wouldn't obtain your abuse address -
abu...@4ax.com"
-- In <7G325.35576$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
tries to netkkkop someone for abusing their copy of Forte Agent.

http://kooks.ourdomain.cjb.net/leibovitch/
_________________________________________________________________________

Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...

>On Sat, 17 Jun 2000 19:24:51 +0100, Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams
><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>>Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:18:57 +0100, Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams
>>><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:45:41 +0100, Steve 'the hipclone' Williams
>>>>><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>Have a nice day :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>He means the goon with the sig line of a 4 year old.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And a shafted picture of a skull-type thingy isn't?
>>>>>>
>>>>>Just what do you *think* the word "shafted" means?
>>>>>For your info: I have skulls all over the place. The shift knob on one
>>>>>of my cars is a chrome skull. I have lamps that resemble a stack of
>>>>>skulls that light up inside. Posters, clothing, science specimens etc.
>>>>>I love skulls, and I'm dying to see yours.
>>>>
>>>>Die quietly.  TIA.
>>>>
>>>>>>>It says something about Texas, and there's some fucked up, broke-assed
>>>>>>>ASCII that I'm afraid is supposed to resemble the great state of
>>>>>>>Texas.  That's an ass kicking right off the bat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I see you haven't met the 'fixed pitch font' yet, have you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>I'll tell you what I *haven't* met yet, and that's *anybody* using
>>>>>ASCII in their sigs, that knows how to format it to display correctly.
>>>>
>>>>HAHAHAHAHA.
>>>>
>>>>Shall we tell him, or make him jump through some more hoops first?
>>>>
>>>>>Anybody can create a bullshit picture, word, or phrase, but I have yet
>>>>>to see *anybody* other than myself, that can reformat it so that
>>>>>somebody might be able to read what it's supposed to be.
>>>>
>>>>HAHAHA.  Crossposted so that the ascii-artists can read this...
>>>
>>>You see, you took that passage as meaning there's nobody on the planet
>>>that can format ASCII, other than me.  You're twisting the intent of
>>
>>Point is, is that your ascii 'art' isn't formatted correctly.
>>
>>http://storage.ourdomain.cjb.net/fuckhead.jpg
> FYI: I would never follow a link you provided.
>I would hope you wouldn't follow any of mine.
>>If it was it would display properly in the fixed pitch font.
> That's *if* the person's newsreader's font is set to fixed, which is
>like reading type from the 1940's and it's ugly.  *Most* people use
>*prettier* font settings like MS Sans Serif etc.

So your saying that since 'most' people (in your estimations) use MS S S to
read posts, ASCII art should now be writted for /that/ font rather than the
fixed pitch font that people have used for years.

What about UNIX doods who dont have MS Sans Serif on their machines?

>>HINT: ASCII art is supposed to be displayed properly in fixed pitch font,
>>favoured over the variable pitched font, it may look OK in the var-pitch you
>>type your messages in but it'll look completely different in some other vp
>>font.
>
>  Yes, I know the story with ASCII, but as I said fixed pitch is too
>plain for email and Usenet messages for most people.

Plain text is too plain, so why not post pretty backgrounds nice fonts, and
JPG picture .sigs using HTML?

>So even if only the *average* person can see it properly, that's cool
>with me.  It would look a little lame if I had a string of ASCII in
>all the most popular font settings.  Everyone I've sent ASCII to, says
>it looks fine. I subscribed to alt.ascii-art because of your xposting,
>so I lurked for awhile and noticed that nobody there was using fixed
>pitch in their art.  I guess it boils down to preference.  I think
>it's much harder to format ASCII in the variable fonts I use, than to
>do it with fixed.  Try it yourself with your sig.  Configure it to
>display in sans serif or whatever it is.

I set Agent to display messages in Tahoma, does that mean that I should
/encode/ my ASCII art so that only people reading in Tahoma can read it?
>
>>>the words to suit your response.  I have never been to an ASCII
>>>related newsgroup. I suppose everyone in those groups can do it, but I
>>
>>Yes.  They can do it properly.  At least I think they can.
>>
>>>was talking about the rest of Usenet. I have a large list of groups
>>>(non ascii) that I hang out in, but I have *never* seen anyone in
>>>those groups format properly.  It is funny how you crossposted to *get
>>>me in trouble* with the ascii guys, but I don't think "Mindcryme" or
>>>"Mister Scary" really care much for posting in their groups anyway.
>>>It's too bad I couldn't use a different name if I ever chose to post
>>>there.  Oh well.
>>>
>>>>> I'm sure there's millions of people out there that know how to do
>>>>>ASCII *properly*, but they seem to avoid my detection.
>>>>> I can supply some links if you'd like to help all these ASCII
>>>>>*artists* stop posting fragmented, broken and deformed *art*.
>>>
>>> As you can see, I explained it already.
>>
>>So have I.
>>
>>>The problem is that you don't seem to pay attention.
>>
>>You are embarassing yourself in front of the Romathians, receive a clue or
>>dont bother doing ASCII-art.
>
>No, anything but the romathians!  I know you just popped out the cunt
>and started doing ASCII, but I have only been doing it for a few
>months.  I'm sure that with enough practice, I will be able to create
>ASCII art that can even be viewed by a romathian. 
>Why aren't you *embarassing* me in any more non-related xposts?
>Obsess much?

-- 
_________________________________________________________________________
                      ____  _
                     / ___|| |_ _____   _____
                     \___ \| __/ _ \ \ / / _ \
  __        ___ _ _ _ ___) | ||  __/\ V /  __/
  \ \      / (_) | (_)____/ \__\___| \_/_\___|
   \ \ /\ / /| | | | |/ _` | '_ ` _ \/ __|
    \ V  V / | | | | | (_| | | | | | \__ \
     \_/\_/  |_|_|_|_|\__,_|_| |_| |_|___/   The really interesting d00d.
_________________________________________________________________________

[ Empire of APDD d00d: #573v13-80y ] [Empire of AFSW d00d: #7h3-r00l3r ]

[ http://kooks.ourdomain.cjb.net ] [ http://steve.ourdomain.cjb.net ]
_________________________________________________________________________

"I AM NOT A WOMAN!"
-- In <956...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths makes
an excellent use of irony.

"I'm a year 8"
-- In <957...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths reveals
the reason why he is such an arrogant, and stupid person.

"THIS STOPS HERE AND NOW!!!!"
-- In <957...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths spoils
our fun when faced with his first experience of Usenet Performance Art.

http://www.geocities.com/doh_nz/
_________________________________________________________________________

"wow you are so tough"
-- In <l7j...@4ax.com> Nick King almost
manages to reach an orgasm over how tough Fred Ziffel is.

http://afjr.ourdomain.cjb.net/king.html
_________________________________________________________________________

"I have no reason to report you."
-- In <Kqf15.16819$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
finally makes a post to Usenet without netkkkopping anyone

"This "Richard" you refer to.  He maintains he's not a pedophile"
-- In <TFW15.35426$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
takes the words of a confessed pedo in denial like Gospel

"I AM NOT DUMB.  If I was, I wouldn't obtain your abuse address -
abu...@4ax.com"
-- In <7G325.35576$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
tries to netkkkop someone for abusing their copy of Forte Agent.

http://kooks.ourdomain.cjb.net/leibovitch/
_________________________________________________________________________

Was it the day before yesterday or was it Sun, 18 Jun 2000 10:05:07 +0100,
when Emperor Steve of AFSW <ste...@bigfoot.com> decided to inform
alt.ascii-art of the following:
 
*Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
*
*>On Sat, 17 Jun 2000 19:24:51 +0100, Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams
*><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
*>
*>>Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
*>>
*>>>On Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:18:57 +0100, Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams
*>>><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
*>>>
*>>>>Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
*>>>>
*>>>>>On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:45:41 +0100, Steve 'the hipclone' Williams
*>>>>><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
*>>>>>>>>Have a nice day :)
*>>>>>>>
*>>>>>>>He means the goon with the sig line of a 4 year old.
*>>>>>>
*>>>>>>And a shafted picture of a skull-type thingy isn't?
*>>>>>>
*>>>>>Just what do you *think* the word "shafted" means?
*>>>>>For your info: I have skulls all over the place. The shift knob on one
*>>>>>of my cars is a chrome skull. I have lamps that resemble a stack of
*>>>>>skulls that light up inside. Posters, clothing, science specimens etc.
*>>>>>I love skulls, and I'm dying to see yours.
*>>>>
*>>>>Die quietly.  TIA.
*>>>>
*>>>>>>>It says something about Texas, and there's some fucked up, broke-assed
*>>>>>>>ASCII that I'm afraid is supposed to resemble the great state of
*>>>>>>>Texas.  That's an ass kicking right off the bat.
*>>>>>>
*>>>>>>I see you haven't met the 'fixed pitch font' yet, have you?
*>>>>>>
*>>>>>I'll tell you what I *haven't* met yet, and that's *anybody* using
*>>>>>ASCII in their sigs, that knows how to format it to display correctly.
*>>>>
*>>>>HAHAHAHAHA.
*>>>>
*>>>>Shall we tell him, or make him jump through some more hoops first?
*>>>>
*>>>>>Anybody can create a bullshit picture, word, or phrase, but I have yet
*>>>>>to see *anybody* other than myself, that can reformat it so that
*>>>>>somebody might be able to read what it's supposed to be.
*>>>>
*>>>>HAHAHA.  Crossposted so that the ascii-artists can read this...
*>>>
*>>>You see, you took that passage as meaning there's nobody on the planet
*>>>that can format ASCII, other than me.  You're twisting the intent of
*>>
*>>Point is, is that your ascii 'art' isn't formatted correctly.
*>>
*>>http://storage.ourdomain.cjb.net/fuckhead.jpg
*> FYI: I would never follow a link you provided.
*>I would hope you wouldn't follow any of mine.
*>>If it was it would display properly in the fixed pitch font.
*> That's *if* the person's newsreader's font is set to fixed, which is
*>like reading type from the 1940's and it's ugly.  *Most* people use
*>*prettier* font settings like MS Sans Serif etc.
*
*So your saying that since 'most' people (in your estimations) use MS S S to
*read posts, ASCII art should now be writted for /that/ font rather than the
*fixed pitch font that people have used for years.
*
*What about UNIX doods who dont have MS Sans Serif on their machines?
*
*>>HINT: ASCII art is supposed to be displayed properly in fixed pitch font,
*>>favoured over the variable pitched font, it may look OK in the var-pitch you
*>>type your messages in but it'll look completely different in some other vp
*>>font.
*>
*>  Yes, I know the story with ASCII, but as I said fixed pitch is too
*>plain for email and Usenet messages for most people.
*
*Plain text is too plain, so why not post pretty backgrounds nice fonts, and
*JPG picture .sigs using HTML?
*
*>So even if only the *average* person can see it properly, that's cool
*>with me.  It would look a little lame if I had a string of ASCII in
*>all the most popular font settings.  Everyone I've sent ASCII to, says
*>it looks fine. I subscribed to alt.ascii-art because of your xposting,
*>so I lurked for awhile and noticed that nobody there was using fixed
*>pitch in their art.  I guess it boils down to preference.  I think
*>it's much harder to format ASCII in the variable fonts I use, than to
*>do it with fixed.  Try it yourself with your sig.  Configure it to
*>display in sans serif or whatever it is.
*
*I set Agent to display messages in Tahoma, does that mean that I should
*/encode/ my ASCII art so that only people reading in Tahoma can read it?
*>
*>>>the words to suit your response.  I have never been to an ASCII
*>>>related newsgroup. I suppose everyone in those groups can do it, but I
*>>
*>>Yes.  They can do it properly.  At least I think they can.
*>>
*>>>was talking about the rest of Usenet. I have a large list of groups
*>>>(non ascii) that I hang out in, but I have *never* seen anyone in
*>>>those groups format properly.  It is funny how you crossposted to *get
*>>>me in trouble* with the ascii guys, but I don't think "Mindcryme" or
*>>>"Mister Scary" really care much for posting in their groups anyway.
*>>>It's too bad I couldn't use a different name if I ever chose to post
*>>>there.  Oh well.
*>>>
*>>>>> I'm sure there's millions of people out there that know how to do
*>>>>>ASCII *properly*, but they seem to avoid my detection.
*>>>>> I can supply some links if you'd like to help all these ASCII
*>>>>>*artists* stop posting fragmented, broken and deformed *art*.
*>>>
*>>> As you can see, I explained it already.
*>>
*>>So have I.
*>>
*>>>The problem is that you don't seem to pay attention.
*>>
*>>You are embarassing yourself in front of the Romathians, receive a clue or
*>>dont bother doing ASCII-art.
*>
*>No, anything but the romathians!  I know you just popped out the cunt
*>and started doing ASCII, but I have only been doing it for a few
*>months.  I'm sure that with enough practice, I will be able to create
*>ASCII art that can even be viewed by a romathian. 
*>Why aren't you *embarassing* me in any more non-related xposts?
*>Obsess much?
*
*-- 
*_________________________________________________________________________
*                      ____  _
*                     / ___|| |_ _____   _____
*                     \___ \| __/ _ \ \ / / _ \
*  __        ___ _ _ _ ___) | ||  __/\ V /  __/
*  \ \      / (_) | (_)____/ \__\___| \_/_\___|
*   \ \ /\ / /| | | | |/ _` | '_ ` _ \/ __|
*    \ V  V / | | | | | (_| | | | | | \__ \
*     \_/\_/  |_|_|_|_|\__,_|_| |_| |_|___/   The really interesting d00d.
*_________________________________________________________________________
*
*[ Empire of APDD d00d: #573v13-80y ] [Empire of AFSW d00d: #7h3-r00l3r ]
*
*[ http://kooks.ourdomain.cjb.net ] [ http://steve.ourdomain.cjb.net ]
*_________________________________________________________________________
*
*"I AM NOT A WOMAN!"
*-- In <956...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths makes
*an excellent use of irony.
*
*"I'm a year 8"
*-- In <957...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths reveals
*the reason why he is such an arrogant, and stupid person.
*
*"THIS STOPS HERE AND NOW!!!!"
*-- In <957...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths spoils
*our fun when faced with his first experience of Usenet Performance Art.
*
*http://www.geocities.com/doh_nz/
*_________________________________________________________________________
*
*"wow you are so tough"
*-- In <l7j...@4ax.com> Nick King almost
*manages to reach an orgasm over how tough Fred Ziffel is.
*
*http://afjr.ourdomain.cjb.net/king.html
*_________________________________________________________________________
*
*"I have no reason to report you."
*-- In <Kqf15.16819$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
*finally makes a post to Usenet without netkkkopping anyone
*
*"This "Richard" you refer to.  He maintains he's not a pedophile"
*-- In <TFW15.35426$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
*takes the words of a confessed pedo in denial like Gospel
*
*"I AM NOT DUMB.  If I was, I wouldn't obtain your abuse address -
*abu...@4ax.com"
*-- In <7G325.35576$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH
*tries to netkkkop someone for abusing their copy of Forte Agent.

That someone was me, teh #zara#thax0tra^^^ d00d. Please alter your sig to
reflect this. okbye.

*
*http://kooks.ourdomain.cjb.net/leibovitch/
*_________________________________________________________________________



-- 
http://www.therainforestsite.com
http://www.hungersite.com/
http://www.freedonation.com/
The internet has had no impact on my life whatsoever.com