Re: Is it me or has Old Salt lost it?
Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams (ste...@bigfoot.com) wrote:
: Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote...
<snip>
: >>
: >>>>>It says something about Texas, and there's some fucked up, broke-assed
: >>>>>ASCII that I'm afraid is supposed to resemble the great state of
: >>>>>Texas. That's an ass kicking right off the bat.
: >>>>
: >>>>I see you haven't met the 'fixed pitch font' yet, have you?
: >>>>
: >>>I'll tell you what I *haven't* met yet, and that's *anybody* using
: >>>ASCII in their sigs, that knows how to format it to display correctly.
<snip>
: If it was it would display properly in the fixed pitch font.
: HINT: ASCII art is supposed to be displayed properly in fixed pitch font,
: favoured over the variable pitched font, it may look OK in the var-pitch you
: type your messages in but it'll look completely different in some other vp
: font.
: >the words to suit your response. I have never been to an ASCII
: >related newsgroup. I suppose everyone in those groups can do it, but I
<snip>
: >
: > As you can see, I explained it already.
: So have I.
: >The problem is that you don't seem to pay attention.
: You are embarassing yourself in front of the Romathians, receive a clue or
: dont bother doing ASCII-art.
--> Do I understand this correctly? Some moron named Steve thinks
that ASCII art - that is traditionally done with non-proportional
fonts (fixed-width fonts); because it doesn't look right on his
graphical, variable, proportional, font displaying screen; thinks
that thousands of people who've been doing this stuff for years;
are WRONG, just because the stuff doesn't look right to him? And
that he is the only `smart' one that can adjust font size/width,
so that the ASCII art `looks' right on his screen? How perfectly
pathetic, short-sighted, ill-advised, stupid and brainless he is.
LEARN about ASCII-art and its' history before you pass judgement,
on something you obviously know nothing about. This stuff was
being done on university main-frames back in the late 60s (wish
I'd kept that `Snoopy calendar' printout, dammit!) and sent to
clunky dot-matrix printers; then pinned-up in labs, halls & dorms.
Steve - you are an immature, self-centered, clueless jerk. LEARN
something before you open your big mouth and put your keyboard
in it. Anyone can take an ASCII doodle and make it look good on
a GUI-based screen. ASCII art has a history that's older (and
obviously MUCH smarter) than you are. Get a grip. Get a life.
--
E.A.G.L.E Librarian A3 BBS:403/481-3133 email:ttu...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1069fd,b1ca36e0c890863 X-Google-Attributes: gid1069fd,public X-Google-Thread: 100b0c,a558ea5044be8c68 X-Google-Attributes: gid100b0c,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,a558ea5044be8c68 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: ttu...@ecn.ab.ca () Subject: Re: Is it me or has Old Salt lost it? Date: 2000/06/17 Message-ID: <394...@ecn.ab.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 635826720 References: <eab...@4ax.com> <a8m6kss8pqolr281rit093tgeon0g8sh9n@pebbles> <0mt...@4ax.com> <394...@the-order.com> <lafaks8lmab37dpq7fcielt7q276ua64lo@pebbles> <3944fcf4.27528208@the-order.c X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.161.206.2 Followup-To: alt.ascii-art X-Complaints-To: new...@sas.ab.ca X-Trace: newsfeed.sas.ab.ca 961277356 27890 198.161.206.2 (17 Jun 2000 21:29:16 GMT) Organization: Edmonton Community Network NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Jun 2000 21:29:16 GMT Newsgroups: alt.fan.jeri-ryan,alt.romath,alt.ascii-art
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.