Re: Is it me or has Old Salt lost it?
From Emperor Steve of AFSW <ste...@bigfoot.com>
· alt.ascii-art
· 18 Jun 2000 00:00 · View full thread
· report
Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote... >On Sat, 17 Jun 2000 19:24:51 +0100, Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams ><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >>Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote... >> >>>On Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:18:57 +0100, Steve 'not a hipclone' Williams >>><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Ere, get a load of dis Min...@the-mission.com (Mindcryme), oo wrote... >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:45:41 +0100, Steve 'the hipclone' Williams >>>>><ste...@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>Have a nice day :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>He means the goon with the sig line of a 4 year old. >>>>>> >>>>>>And a shafted picture of a skull-type thingy isn't? >>>>>> >>>>>Just what do you *think* the word "shafted" means? >>>>>For your info: I have skulls all over the place. The shift knob on one >>>>>of my cars is a chrome skull. I have lamps that resemble a stack of >>>>>skulls that light up inside. Posters, clothing, science specimens etc. >>>>>I love skulls, and I'm dying to see yours. >>>> >>>>Die quietly. TIA. >>>> >>>>>>>It says something about Texas, and there's some fucked up, broke-assed >>>>>>>ASCII that I'm afraid is supposed to resemble the great state of >>>>>>>Texas. That's an ass kicking right off the bat. >>>>>> >>>>>>I see you haven't met the 'fixed pitch font' yet, have you? >>>>>> >>>>>I'll tell you what I *haven't* met yet, and that's *anybody* using >>>>>ASCII in their sigs, that knows how to format it to display correctly. >>>> >>>>HAHAHAHAHA. >>>> >>>>Shall we tell him, or make him jump through some more hoops first? >>>> >>>>>Anybody can create a bullshit picture, word, or phrase, but I have yet >>>>>to see *anybody* other than myself, that can reformat it so that >>>>>somebody might be able to read what it's supposed to be. >>>> >>>>HAHAHA. Crossposted so that the ascii-artists can read this... >>> >>>You see, you took that passage as meaning there's nobody on the planet >>>that can format ASCII, other than me. You're twisting the intent of >> >>Point is, is that your ascii 'art' isn't formatted correctly. >> >>http://storage.ourdomain.cjb.net/fuckhead.jpg > FYI: I would never follow a link you provided. >I would hope you wouldn't follow any of mine. >>If it was it would display properly in the fixed pitch font. > That's *if* the person's newsreader's font is set to fixed, which is >like reading type from the 1940's and it's ugly. *Most* people use >*prettier* font settings like MS Sans Serif etc. So your saying that since 'most' people (in your estimations) use MS S S to read posts, ASCII art should now be writted for /that/ font rather than the fixed pitch font that people have used for years. What about UNIX doods who dont have MS Sans Serif on their machines? >>HINT: ASCII art is supposed to be displayed properly in fixed pitch font, >>favoured over the variable pitched font, it may look OK in the var-pitch you >>type your messages in but it'll look completely different in some other vp >>font. > > Yes, I know the story with ASCII, but as I said fixed pitch is too >plain for email and Usenet messages for most people. Plain text is too plain, so why not post pretty backgrounds nice fonts, and JPG picture .sigs using HTML? >So even if only the *average* person can see it properly, that's cool >with me. It would look a little lame if I had a string of ASCII in >all the most popular font settings. Everyone I've sent ASCII to, says >it looks fine. I subscribed to alt.ascii-art because of your xposting, >so I lurked for awhile and noticed that nobody there was using fixed >pitch in their art. I guess it boils down to preference. I think >it's much harder to format ASCII in the variable fonts I use, than to >do it with fixed. Try it yourself with your sig. Configure it to >display in sans serif or whatever it is. I set Agent to display messages in Tahoma, does that mean that I should /encode/ my ASCII art so that only people reading in Tahoma can read it? > >>>the words to suit your response. I have never been to an ASCII >>>related newsgroup. I suppose everyone in those groups can do it, but I >> >>Yes. They can do it properly. At least I think they can. >> >>>was talking about the rest of Usenet. I have a large list of groups >>>(non ascii) that I hang out in, but I have *never* seen anyone in >>>those groups format properly. It is funny how you crossposted to *get >>>me in trouble* with the ascii guys, but I don't think "Mindcryme" or >>>"Mister Scary" really care much for posting in their groups anyway. >>>It's too bad I couldn't use a different name if I ever chose to post >>>there. Oh well. >>> >>>>> I'm sure there's millions of people out there that know how to do >>>>>ASCII *properly*, but they seem to avoid my detection. >>>>> I can supply some links if you'd like to help all these ASCII >>>>>*artists* stop posting fragmented, broken and deformed *art*. >>> >>> As you can see, I explained it already. >> >>So have I. >> >>>The problem is that you don't seem to pay attention. >> >>You are embarassing yourself in front of the Romathians, receive a clue or >>dont bother doing ASCII-art. > >No, anything but the romathians! I know you just popped out the cunt >and started doing ASCII, but I have only been doing it for a few >months. I'm sure that with enough practice, I will be able to create >ASCII art that can even be viewed by a romathian. >Why aren't you *embarassing* me in any more non-related xposts? >Obsess much? -- _________________________________________________________________________ ____ _ / ___|| |_ _____ _____ \___ \| __/ _ \ \ / / _ \ __ ___ _ _ _ ___) | || __/\ V / __/ \ \ / (_) | (_)____/ \__\___| \_/_\___| \ \ /\ / /| | | | |/ _` | '_ ` _ \/ __| \ V V / | | | | | (_| | | | | | \__ \ \_/\_/ |_|_|_|_|\__,_|_| |_| |_|___/ The really interesting d00d. _________________________________________________________________________ [ Empire of APDD d00d: #573v13-80y ] [Empire of AFSW d00d: #7h3-r00l3r ] [ http://kooks.ourdomain.cjb.net ] [ http://steve.ourdomain.cjb.net ] _________________________________________________________________________ "I AM NOT A WOMAN!" -- In <956...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths makes an excellent use of irony. "I'm a year 8" -- In <957...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths reveals the reason why he is such an arrogant, and stupid person. "THIS STOPS HERE AND NOW!!!!" -- In <957...@shelley.paradise.net.nz> Josef Griffiths spoils our fun when faced with his first experience of Usenet Performance Art. http://www.geocities.com/doh_nz/ _________________________________________________________________________ "wow you are so tough" -- In <l7j...@4ax.com> Nick King almost manages to reach an orgasm over how tough Fred Ziffel is. http://afjr.ourdomain.cjb.net/king.html _________________________________________________________________________ "I have no reason to report you." -- In <Kqf15.16819$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH finally makes a post to Usenet without netkkkopping anyone "This "Richard" you refer to. He maintains he's not a pedophile" -- In <TFW15.35426$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH takes the words of a confessed pedo in denial like Gospel "I AM NOT DUMB. If I was, I wouldn't obtain your abuse address - abu...@4ax.com" -- In <7G325.35576$MK4...@quark.idirect.com> AVRAHAM LEIBOVITCH tries to netkkkop someone for abusing their copy of Forte Agent. http://kooks.ourdomain.cjb.net/leibovitch/ _________________________________________________________________________
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1069fd,b1ca36e0c890863 X-Google-Attributes: gid1069fd,public X-Google-Thread: f996b,a558ea5044be8c68 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Emperor Steve of AFSW <ste...@bigfoot.com> Subject: Re: Is it me or has Old Salt lost it? Date: 2000/06/18 Message-ID: <od035.17464$zI.74919@stones> X-Deja-AN: 636260715 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <eab...@4ax.com> <a8m6kss8pqolr281rit093tgeon0g8sh9n@pebbles> <0mt...@4ax.com> <394...@the-order.com> <lafaks8lmab37dpq7fcielt7q276ua64lo@pebbles> <394...@the-order.com> <e3lhksol7uijuh56p6nuo06jge32l14dj9@pebbles> <394...@the-order.com> <5kP25.8867$zI.62517@stones> <394...@the-order.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Summary: Read the message body, ya' lazy freak X-Complaints-To: abu...@plus.net.uk X-Trace: stones 961318868 195.166.143.189 (Sun, 18 Jun 2000 10:01:08 BST) Organization: Who wants to know? MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 10:01:08 BST Newsgroups: alt.fan.jeri-ryan,alt.ascii-art
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.