Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 2 Jun 2003.
Re: ASCII Stuff

Re: ASCII Stuff

BoD wrote:
> Veronica Karlsson wrote:
> > BoD wrote:
> > > <snip>

> > Why? It certainly won't remove the need to scroll (because you still
> > have to scroll past it to get to the next message).
> 
> I'm not sure I understand.
> When I want to read next message in thread I don't have to scroll
> anything.

In the news readers I'm familiar with you get the next message by
"scrolling past the end" of the current message.

> I agree but some have said that you cannot assume that the previous
> message is actually here.

That's right, you can't, which is why you should quote some text (but
not all of it).

> By the way the fact that it may be redundent is IMO not a problem:
> with the current "average" bandwidth, an article being 50 lines
> instead of 25 does not make a difference.

It makes a difference in the "bandwidth" experienced by the human eye
which has to sweep past those extra 25 lines.

> > If it's not then
> > a short quote should be enough to not lose the context. Most of the
> > time there is no need to quote the entire thing.
> 
> But sometimes you want to answer the whole article!

I think we must be talking past each other somehow. Please, show some
examples of "answering the whole article" (i.e. links to posts at Google
or some similar service).

> > If your response "carries its own
> > context" (i.e. can be understood on its own) then, sure, go ahead,
> > remove the quote. If it doesn't, then cut out everything except that
> > little bit of it that you are responding to. If you are responding to
> > more than one point, please do the "middle-posting" (normal) style.
> 
> I'm lost. What do you recommend when I want to answer the whole article:
> 1. don't quote anything,

If your reply is a "complete article" of its own, which doesn't need
anything from the previous one to make sense, sure.

> 2. quote everything, at the end (top post)

This is the one I don't like. It's confusing.

> or 3. quote everything, at the beginning (bottom post)

I don't like this one either.

> Me I answer 1 or 2 but not 3. Then again it's just my opinion ;)

Me I answer 4: quote relevant bits, not whole posts.

> > >for example useragents become more and more 'intelligent',
> >
> > They do?
> 
> I think some fundamental laws of the universe can explain this
> way of the evolution... :)

Who says such "evolution" has to be in the direction of "more
intelligent"? All it says is that things change as time passes.

> But for instance I'm sure you can find a newsreader that will "hide"
> any quoted text if it is at the bottom of an article.
> I can imagine you can even configure some to reformat articles and
> to put bottom quoted text to the top of the article :)

And that would be "intelligent"? **brrr**  (that sort of features tend
to make a mess of ascii art)

> Me I use Outlook Express with OEQuoteFix, it has an option to hide
> sigs.

THAT can be intelligent (IF the sender has a correctly formed sig
separator and if you are not interested in seeing sigs, sig collectors
like me might not be as interested...)

> > > bandwidth is less and less a problem, ...)
> >
> > Computer bandwidth maybe, but not "human bandwidth". Our eyes and
> > brains and fingers still work the same way they did thousands of
> > years ago.
> 
> Not sure :) Humans do evolve!

Yes, but not very quickly. A few thousand years don't make that much
difference.


-- 
  #####       c    ^                       OO        /\\\\
#####  |     /|\    `^^^^^^^%--           '||`      |  \\\\
####-[.]\    / \      "   "  \ ha ha ha    dd      /[.]-\\\|
###   _|                                            |_   \\|
###  (_  http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/cgi/asciichat/  _)}  ==
 \    /        A S C I I  A R T  C H A T             #    ||\

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,aaba0d0b6dc1b0b5
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-02 14:24:10 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!h180n1fls34o1115.telia.COM!not-for-mail
From: Veronica Karlsson <v...@hotbrev.com>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: ASCII Stuff
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 21:36:33 +0000
Lines: 106
Message-ID: <3ED...@hotbrev.com>
References: <110...@news.kolumbus.fi> <3ec7046b$0$3540$626...@news.free.fr> <110...@news.kolumbus.fi> <oso...@4ax.com> <3ED...@hotbrev.com> <3ed7edaa$0$4585$626...@news.free.fr> <3ED...@hotbrev.com> <3ed8b88a$0$11565$626...@news.free.fr> <3ED...@hotbrev.com> <3edb5ac6$0$26626$626...@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: h180n1fls34o1115.telia.com (213.67.71.180)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1054589048 9537084 213.67.71.180 (16 [58193])
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (X11; I; Linux 2.2.22-6.2.3 i586)
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:23426
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2003 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post