Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 1 Jan 1997.
_ _ _ _ _ _ | | | |___ ___ _ __ ___| |_ / \ _ __ ___| |__ (_)_ _____ | | | / __|/ _ \ '_ \ / _ \ __| / _ \ | '__/ __| '_ \| \ \ / / _ \ | |_| \__ \ __/ | | | __/ |_ / ___ \| | | (__| | | | |\ V / __/ \___/|___/\___|_| |_|\___|\__| /_/ \_\_| \___|_| |_|_| \_/ \___|
Vietmath War: Einstein Dysprosium on Peano Axioms of Math
alt.ascii-art
· 5 messages · 1 Jan 1997 - 21 Jan 1997
In article <5aedhv$po...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Arc...@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium) writes: > In another thread Einstein Dysprosium in Vietmath will be another > article and I hope to seek out the help of Colin Douthwaite in possible > ascii art of this. --- quoting from THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE --- There are two possibilities. One of them is this. The loop is held stationary, not moving, and I take the magnet and I move the magnet into the loop. That causes the current to flow. Now that case the charges in the loop were not themselves in motion, so it can't have been the magnetic field of the bar magnet that made them move but since they did move There therefore was an electric field and so we conclude that a changing magnetic field, moving the bar magnet, created an electric field. And that of course was Faraday's great discovery of Electromagnetic Induction in the 19th century. And that is one explanation of that experiment. Now there is another completely different, independent explanation and that goes this way. Suppose instead I hold the bar magnet stationary and I move the loop. Now of course exactly the same thing happens. But in this case we have no moving magnet, no changing magnetic field , but instead, the charges in the loop are moving because I am moving the whole loop. They have the velocity v and this velocity crossed into the magnetic field of the bar magnet gives us a force which causes the current to flow and that also describes perfectly well the experiment that we just saw. So those two different phenomenon that is to say this, loop stationary and magnet moving and this, magnet stationary and loop moving are actually two completely distinct independent phenomenon that have completely different explanations. When Albert Einstein saw that he said look guys, you just got to be kidding any yoyo can see that those two things are the same thing . So it was this simple little experiment that was really the starting point of the theory of relativity, not the Michelson Morley experiment. Not some exotic experiment to detect the motion of the Earth through the ether. But this simple little phenomenon that of course everybody knew about, but which disturbed nobody else , except , Albert Einstein. And what disturbed Einstein was not that we had difficulty explaining this phenomenon this equation explains them perfectly in every case. What disturbed Albert Einstein was the lack of inner perfection of the theory and what he did in response was to produce a theory the Special Theory of Relativity which had just that kind of inner perfection. --- end quoting from THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE --- The inner perfection How many people can see that the Successor Axiom of the Peano Axiom System is the same identical Series as the Series of the definition of what a P-adic, (an Infinite Integer) is. So far, I am the only and the first human to see that these two are identical. What does this mean? It means that Naturals are the P-adics and that the old Finite Integers were a imprecise and foggy unclear concept. Physics has inner perfection, and math does also, but of course math has inner perfection for all of mathematics is but a minor subset of physics. Math is physics only where the experimentation is usually just pen and paper. And no math theorem (theorems are fancy words for physics experiment using just pen and paper). No math theorem is as important as any physics experiment. Let me say that another way. All physics experiments are more important than any math theorem (experiment) because all physics experiments usually draw more than pen and paper and imagination into the experiment itself, and in the case of the above physics experiment they draw from the world magnets and loops and electrical devices. Would Colin Douthwaite or someone please draw a ascii picture of the professor moving a bar magnet through loop and then loop through bar magnet. Sincere thanks
In article <5aeect$hi...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Arc...@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium) writes: > Would Colin Douthwaite or someone please draw a ascii picture of the > professor moving a bar magnet through loop and then loop through bar > magnet. Sincere thanks Subject: [18] Anniversary From: cfb...@southern.co.nz (Colin Douthwaite) Date: 1996/09/17 Message-Id: <51mfb9$9u...@orm.southern.co.nz> Organization: Southern InterNet Services Newsgroups: alt.ascii-Art ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ _ ' ) /) -( __ _(/ (__ ) / (_(_(_ _____ (, / | , /---| __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ ) / |_ / (_/ (__(_ (/___(/_/ (_/_)_(_(_/ (_ (_/_ (_/ .-/ /) (_/ ___ // (_) /(_ /) (/ /) , , _ // _/_ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _/_ (_(_(/_ (__ (_(_/_)_(___(_ _(_ (_(_/ (_(__ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ( 18 ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Last Skit of NP2 ( ILLUSTRATED ) Text by Ludwig Plutonium Pictures from just about everywhere. 30/6/94 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ > Show a long sine wave curve. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. --/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/- `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' > Show a man dressed up in a tuxedo inspecting this sine wave curve > for fluctuations. ../ ~`~`~'~~'~ ``;; - '/~////~|\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~ ~////~//||||\\\\~\\\\\\~\\\\\~ ~//~//||||~||||\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~ ~///|||~||||~||||\\~\\\\\~\\\\\\\\~. ~/<<<<<||<<<<<<\\\\<<<<<"|""\\\~\\\\\~ ;\\\\\\\\\~~\\\\\~\\\\\~/""" ""|\\\\""|\ |||/\\\\|\\\\~\\\\\\|/ "||"""||\~ ||/ |"""""""" ~ ||| """"""| ==, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,====""|"""~ \----------===-------------/ "|""""||~ |\ \\ / \ \\ / """''|""~ | \ // \ / ""/~ ||/ | ~~~~~ / ~~~~~~~ "/P '~ \ | , | \ \ ~~\_/ " \ / ,."" \ \............../ ,. \ \_______/ ,. \ ,.' \ ,.' \ ,'~ / ~~~~~~~~~ \ _ _ _ / ___ ____ \ _ _ _ / ! \_/ ! \ / !___/~\_____! \ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ _ _ _ _ _ \ / \ /| \ / .-. .-. .-. .-. \ / | \ / --/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/- \ / / \ / `-' `-' `-' `-' \ / / \/ \ / / | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -| / | | / |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |/ > Show him pouting whenever a math person standing on the sidelines > points out that there are no fluctuations in the sine curve. ../ ~`~`~'~~'~ ``;; - '/~////~|\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~ ~////~//||||\\\\~\\\\\\~\\\\\~ ~//~//||||~||||\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~ ~///|||~||||~||||\\~\\\\\~\\\\\\\\~. ~/<<<<<||<<<<<<\\\\<<<<<"|""\\\~\\\\\~ ;\\\\\\\\\~~\\\\\~\\\\\~/""" ""|\\\\""|\ |||/\\\\|\\\\~\\\\\\|/ "||"""||\~ ||/ ---- _____ -- ___ |"""""""" ~ ||| ___ ____ """"""| ==, ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,====""|"""~ \----------===-------------/ "|""""||~ |\ \\ / \ \\ / """''|""~ | \ // \ / ""/~ ||/ | ~~~~~ / ~~~~~~~ "/P '~ \ | , | \ \ ~~\_/ " \ ,."" \ ______ ,. \ (_____ ) ,. \ (______) ,.' \ ,.' \ ,'~ / ~~~~~~~~~ \ _ _ _ / ___ ____ \ _ _ _ / ! \_/ ! \ / !___/~\_____! \ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ _ _ _ _ _ \ / \ /| \ / .-. .-. .-. .-. \ / | \ / --/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/- \ / / \ / `-' `-' `-' `-' \ / / \/ \ / / | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -| / | | / -cfbd- |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |/ ////// ////// (//////) ... .. .. ... . ////// . ... .())((() .. . . . .... . . . .. . . . _____|____|_____ ((()(())) / \ (((((((() | ----- |()(()(())_ | MATH |(((()()() | \ MAN '\()))))( | \ ----- \((((( / \ . \___. ( \ / \ |:| ) \ | | |`------' | \____________/ \_________/ -mh- ........................................................................ > MWBR stands for the cosmic microwave background radiation. The > cosmic MWBR is relentlessly uniform and it is QUANTUM BLACKBODY > radiation. It is cavity radiation. So then the Atom Totality has > no problems with explaining it. Inside an atom totality, MWBR is > uniform and since it is an atom then it comes out measured as > Quantum Blackbody. This also explains Olber's Paradox because an > electron cavity is black, from blackbody. > But to the present day science community who believe a different > theory, a different paradigm, they believe in the Big Bang, then > in order to continue with that fakery, the MWBR must be seen to > fluctuate. Since it is uniform and the Big Bang theory is out > the window, con artists in the physics community are set-up to > find fluctuations by hook or crook. > Show Smoot trying to measure the parameters of virus using a meter > stick. __ || || //////// || |:---[.] || |( _J || _ _ | ^ ( _| || ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, \ / / \_____) || / ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( \( = =) / _____ \ || < ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( / ( ^ ) | / \ | || \ (__(__(__(__(__(__(__(__) ~ | | | | || ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ \ /\ /\__ | || -cfbd- | | \/--- \ \ ) | >_____/_____) \__________/ || / \ || | | ~~ \ \\ \ |\ \ | \ \ | | | | | | | | | / | |________/____| (_________)____) -mh- ============================== > Show him finding fluctuations in his measurement. //////\\ / \ _| _ _ |_ |.|-(.)-(.)+.| \| J |/ \ --- / --------------- UUUU --------- \ / --------- UUUU ------------------- | "####" | | | | | | _ _ _ _ | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, \ / \ / -, ,- | | / ( ( ( ( ( \( u u) ,,,,,,,,,, ( @ @) ,,,,,,,(. .) | | \__(__(__(__(__(__) ( ^ ) (__(__(__(_) ( ^ ) (__(__(__(^) | | ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | | ____________________________________________________________________ | | [_________|______|______|______|______|______|______|______|______|__] | | 20 40 60 80 100 | -cfbd- > Show a true scientist yell from the sidelines > "Hey, Smoot or smut, don't you think that you have reached the > limit of precision of your measuring devices? That in 20 or 50 > years from now when they have even more precise measuring devices > that MWBR will be seen uniform way below what your own > measurements have recorded?" //\\\||///\\ ,------------------------------------, //| |\\ ( Hey, Smoot or smut, don't you think ) |[ | <q><p> | ]| ( that you have reached the limit of ) |||| .\. |||| o O ( precision of your measuring devices? ) |||< _ >||| o ( That in 20 or 50 years from now ) \__(_)_/ o o ( when they have even more precise ) _____!___!_____ ( measuring devices that MWBR will be ) | | \ / | | ( seen uniform way below what your ) | | _ \./ | | ( own measurements have recorded? ) | |[_] | | | '------------------------------------' | | o | | | | | | | | | o | | |__| | |__| WW| o |WW | | | | o | |____|____| | | | | | | | | | -cfbd- |___|___| \_/ \_/ > Show Smoot undaunted with his quest to impose his illogic unto the > science community. Show Smoot looking at his measurement > instruments bewildered by what was said to him. .?.?.?.? / ^^^^^^ \ _| - - |_ |.| (0^0) |.| \| J |/ \ (O) / --------------- UUUU --------- \ / --------- UUUU ------------------- | "####" | | | | | | __________/~| __ | | / __ __ | || | | |/ \___/ \_| ==== | | | | | |__ | | | | | |-.\ | | | | |__| \\ | | | | || || | | | | ======__| | | | | ________||__ | | |_| /____________\ | | ____________________________________________________________________ | | [_________|______|______|______|______|______|______|______|______|__] | | 20 40 60 80 100 | -cfbd- > Show Smoot take his big bang blanket to bed with him just as Linus > in the Peanuts comic strip. __ __ ||____________________________________________|| || _______________________________________ || || { } || || { //////\\ } || || { / \ } || || { _| _ _ |_ } || || { |.|-(.)-(.)+.| } || || { \| J |/ } || || { \ --- / } || || --- UUUU ------ \ / ----- UUUU ------- ||{ "####" ) ||{ \ || . || . \ || . ||\ . . ' \ ~~ \ . * > \ . ,__./ \ \ . / \ \ . | BOMB | \ \ . \____/ \ . \ \ . \ . \ \ . \ . \ \ ( ) \ (_______________________________________________________) \ | | \|______________________________________________________| || | || | || | -cfbd- || | `~~ `~~ > Show Smoot with his thumb in his mouth. Er....I'm afraid a picture of _that_ defeats me :-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
--- most of text from THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE ---
There are two possibilities. One of them is this. The
loop is held stationary, not moving, and I take the magnet and I move
the magnet into the loop.
Show a bar magnet moving through the loop.
.-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-.
--/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
`-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-'
////////
| [.]
|( _J
| ^ ( _|
/ \_____)
/ _____ \
| / \ |
| | | |
\ /\ /\__ |
| | \/---
\ \ ) .-. .-. .-. .-.
| >_____/_____) --/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
\___ `-' `-' `-'
/ \
| |
\ \\
\ |\
\ | \
\ | |
| | |
| | |
| / |
|________/____|
(_________)____)
=====Princeton Univ doormat ===
That causes the current to flow. Now that
case the charges in the loop were not themselves in motion, so it
can't have been the magnetic field of the bar magnet that made them
move but since they did move
There therefore was an electric field and so we conclude that
a changing magnetic field, moving the bar magnet, created an electric
field. And that of course was Faraday's great discovery of
Electromagnetic Induction in the 19th century.
../ ~`~`~'~~'~ ``;; -
'/~////~|\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~
~////~//||||\\\\~\\\\\\~\\\\\~
~//~//||||~||||\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~
~///|||~||||~||||\\~\\\\\~\\\\\\\\~.
~/<<<<<||<<<<<<\\\\<<<<<"|""\\\~\\\\\~
;\\\\\\\\\~~\\\\\~\\\\\~/""" ""|\\\\""|\
|||/\\\\|\\\\~\\\\\\|/ "||"""||\~
||/ |"""""""" ~
||| """"""|
= ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,====""|"""~
"|""""||~
| \\ / \ \\ """''|""~
| // \ ""/~ ||/
| / "/P '~
\ | , |
\ \ ~~\_/ "
\ / ,.""
\ \............../ ,.
\ \_______/ ,.
\ ,.'
\ ,.'
\ ,'~
/ ~~~~~~~~~ \
_ _ _ / ___ ____ \ _ _ _
/ ! \_/ ! \
/ !___/~\_____! \
.-. .-. .-. .-.
--/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
`-' `-' `-' `-'
And that is one explanation of that experiment.
Now there is another completely different, independent explanation and
that goes this way. Suppose instead I hold the bar magnet stationary
and I move the loop. Now of course exactly the same thing happens. But
in this case we have no moving magnet, no changing magnetic field ,
but instead, the charges in the loop are moving because I am moving the
whole loop. They have the velocity v and this velocity crossed into
the magnetic field of the bar magnet gives us a force which causes the
current to flow and that also describes perfectly well the experiment
that we just saw. So those two different phenomenon that is to say
this, loop stationary and magnet moving and this,
magnet stationary and loop moving are actually two completely distinct
independent phenomenon that have completely different explanations.
When Albert Einstein saw that he said look guys, you just got to be
kidding any yoyo can see that those two things are the same thing.
//\\\||///\\ ,------------------------------------
//| |\\ ( Look guys, you got to be kidding, any )
|[ | <q><p> | ]| ( yoyo can see that those two things )
|||| .\. |||| o O ( are the same thing. )
|||< _ >||| o '------------------------------------'
\__(_)_/ o o
_____!___!_____
| | \ / | |
| | _ \./ | |
| |[_] | | |
| | o | |
| | | | |
| | o | |
|__| | |__|
WW| o |WW
| | |
| o |
|____|____|
| | |
| | |
| | |
|___|___|
\_/ \_/ art readapted from C. Douthwaite
So it was this simple little experiment that was really the starting
point
of the theory of relativity, not the Michelson-Morley experiment. Not
some exotic experiment to detect the motion of the Earth through the
ether. But this simple little phenomenon that of course everybody knew
about, but which disturbed nobody else , except , Albert Einstein. And
what disturbed Einstein was not that we had difficulty explaining this
phenomenon this equation explains them perfectly in every case. What
disturbed Albert Einstein was the lack of inner perfection of the
theory and what he did in response was to produce a theory the Special
Theory of Relativity which had just that kind of inner perfection.
--- text quoted from THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE ---
The inner perfection
How many people can see that the Successor Axiom of the Peano Axiom
System
is the same identical Series
as the Series of the definition of what a P-adic, (an Infinite Integer)
is.
What does this mean? It means that Naturals are the P-adics and that
the old mathematics of Finite Integers was a imprecise, a foggy,
unclear concept. Just as Newtonian Mechanics was wrong and a fake, so
also is the Naturals = Finite Integers a fakery. Quantum Mechanics
replaced Newtonian Mechanics as the true physics. So also, will
Naturals = P-adics replace the fakery that is Finite Integers.
But this simple little phenomenon that of course everybody knew
about, but which disturbed nobody else , except ,Archimedes Plutonium.
And
what disturbed AP was not that we had difficulty proving simple math
problems as ancient as the ancient Greeks this
phenomenon this identicalness of the Series of the Successor Axiom ,
identical to the Series of p-adic definition explains them perfectly in
every case. What
disturbed AP was the lack of inner perfection of the
theory and what he did in response was to produce a theory the Naturals
= P-adics = Infinite Integers which had just that kind of inner
perfection.
--- most of text from THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE ---
There are two possibilities. One of them is this. The
loop is held stationary, not moving, and I take the magnet and I move
the magnet into the loop.
Show a bar magnet moving through a stationary loop.
And then, show a loop moving through a stationary bar magnet.
.-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-.
--/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
`-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-'
////////
| [.]
|( _J
| ^ ( _|
/ \_____)
/ _____ \
| / \ |
| | | |
\ /\ /\__ |
| | \/---
\ \ ) .-. .-. .-. .-.
| >_____/_____) --/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
\___ `-' `-' `-'
/ \
| |
\ \\
\ |\
\ | \
\ | |
| | |
| | |
| / |
|________/____|
(_________)____)
================================
That causes the current to flow. Now that
case the charges in the loop were not themselves in motion, so it
can't have been the magnetic field of the bar magnet that made them
move but since they did move
There therefore was an electric field and so we conclude that
a changing magnetic field, moving the bar magnet, created an electric
field. And that of course was Faraday's great discovery of
Electromagnetic Induction in the 19th century.
../ ~`~`~'~~'~ ``;; -
'/~////~|\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~
~////~//||||\\\\~\\\\\\~\\\\\~
~//~//||||~||||\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~
~///|||~||||~||||\\~\\\\\~\\\\\\\\~.
~/<<<<<||<<<<<<\\\\<<<<<"|""\\\~\\\\\~
;\\\\\\\\\~~\\\\\~\\\\\~/""" ""|\\\\""|\
|||/\\\\|\\\\~\\\\\\|/ "||"""||\~
||/ |"""""""" ~
||| """"""|
= ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,====""|"""~
"|""""||~
| \\ / \ \\ """''|""~
| // \ ""/~ ||/
| / "/P '~
\ | , |
\ \ ~~\_/ "
\ / ,.""
\ \............../ ,.
\ \_______/ ,.
\ ,.'
\ ,.'
\ ,'~
/ ~~~~~~~~~ \
_ _ _ / ___ ____ \ _ _ _
/ ! \_/ ! \
/ !___/~\_____! \
.-. .-. .-. .-.
--/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
`-' `-' `-' `-'
And that is one explanation of that experiment.
Now there is another completely different, independent explanation and
that goes this way. Suppose instead I hold the bar magnet stationary
and I move the loop. Now of course exactly the same thing happens. But
in this case we have no moving magnet, no changing magnetic field ,
but instead, the charges in the loop are moving because I am moving the
whole loop. They have the velocity v and this velocity crossed into
the magnetic field of the bar magnet gives us a force which causes the
current to flow and that also describes perfectly well the experiment
that we just saw. So those two different phenomenon that is to say
this, loop stationary and magnet moving and this,
magnet stationary and loop moving are actually two completely distinct
independent phenomenon that have completely different explanations.
When Albert Einstein saw that he said look guys, you just got to be
kidding any yoyo can see that those two things are the same thing.
//\\\||///\\ ,------------------------------------
//| |\\ ( Look guys, you got to be kidding, any )
|[ | <q><p> | ]| ( yoyo can see that those two things )
|||| .\. |||| o O ( are the same thing. )
|||< _ >||| o '------------------------------------'
\__(_)_/ o o
_____!___!_____
| | \ / | |
| | _ \./ | |
| |[_] | | |
| | o | |
| | | | |
| | o | |
|__| | |__|
WW| o |WW
| | |
| o |
|____|____|
| | |
| | |
| | |
|___|___|
\_/ \_/ (art from others)
So it was this simple little experiment that was really the starting
point of the theory of relativity, not the Michelson-Morley
experiment. Not
some exotic experiment to detect the motion of the Earth through the
ether. But this simple little phenomenon that of course everybody knew
about, but which disturbed nobody else , except , Albert Einstein. And
what disturbed Einstein was not that we had difficulty explaining this
phenomenon this equation explains them perfectly in every case. What
disturbed Albert Einstein was the lack of inner perfection of the
theory and what he did in response was to produce a theory the Special
Theory of Relativity which had just that kind of inner perfection.
--- text quoted from THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE ---
The inner perfection
How many people can see that the Successor Axiom of the Peano Axiom
System is a Series of endless adding 1
such as 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + .....
is the same identical Series
as the Series of the definition of what a P-adic, (an Infinite Integer)
is.
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + .....
What does this mean? It means that Naturals are the P-adics and that
the old mathematics of Finite Integers was an imprecise, a foggy,
unclear concept. Just as Newtonian Mechanics was wrong and a fake, so
also is the Naturals = Finite Integers a fakery. Quantum Mechanics
replaced Newtonian Mechanics as the true physics. So also, will
Naturals = P-adics replace the fakery that is Finite Integers.
But this simple little phenomenon that of course everybody knew about,
but which disturbed nobody else, except, Archimedes Plutonium. And what
disturbed AP was not that we had difficulty proving simple math
problems as ancient as the ancient Greeks this phenomenon this
identicalness of the Series of the Successor Axiom, identical to the
Series of p-adic definition explains them perfectly in every case. What
disturbed AP was the lack of inner perfection of the theory and what he
did in response was to produce a theory the Naturals = P-adics =
Infinite Integers which had just that kind of inner perfection.
--- most of text from THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE ---
There are two possibilities. One of them is this. The
loop is held stationary, not moving, and I take the magnet and I move
the magnet into the loop.
Show a bar magnet moving through a stationary loop.
And then, show a loop moving through a stationary bar magnet.
.-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-.
--/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
`-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-'
////////
| [.]
|( _J
| ^ ( _|
/ \_____)
/ _____ \
| / \ |
| | | |
\ /\ /\__ |
| | \/---
\ \ ) .-. .-. .-. .-.
| >_____/_____) --/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
\___ `-' `-' `-'
/ \
| |
\ \\
\ |\
\ | \
\ | |
| | |
| | |
| / |
|________/____|
(_________)____)
================================
That causes the current to flow. Now that
case the charges in the loop were not themselves in motion, so it
can't have been the magnetic field of the bar magnet that made them
move but since they did move
There therefore was an electric field and so we conclude that
a changing magnetic field, moving the bar magnet, created an electric
field. And that of course was Faraday's great discovery of
Electromagnetic Induction in the 19th century.
../ ~`~`~'~~'~ ``;; -
'/~////~|\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~
~////~//||||\\\\~\\\\\\~\\\\\~
~//~//||||~||||\\\\\\~\\\\\~\\\~
~///|||~||||~||||\\~\\\\\~\\\\\\\\~.
~/<<<<<||<<<<<<\\\\<<<<<"|""\\\~\\\\\~
;\\\\\\\\\~~\\\\\~\\\\\~/""" ""|\\\\""|\
|||/\\\\|\\\\~\\\\\\|/ "||"""||\~
||/ |"""""""" ~
||| """"""|
= ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,====""|"""~
"|""""||~
| \\ / \ \\ """''|""~
| // \ ""/~ ||/
| / "/P '~
\ | , |
\ \ ~~\_/ "
\ / ,.""
\ \............../ ,.
\ \_______/ ,.
\ ,.'
\ ,.'
\ ,'~
/ ~~~~~~~~~ \
_ _ _ / ___ ____ \ _ _ _
/ ! \_/ ! \
/ !___/~\_____! \
.-. .-. .-. .-.
--/---\---/---\---/---\---/---\---/-
`-' `-' `-' `-'
And that is one explanation of that experiment.
Now there is another completely different, independent explanation and
that goes this way. Suppose instead I hold the bar magnet stationary
and I move the loop. Now of course exactly the same thing happens. But
in this case we have no moving magnet, no changing magnetic field ,
but instead, the charges in the loop are moving because I am moving the
whole loop. They have the velocity v and this velocity crossed into
the magnetic field of the bar magnet gives us a force which causes the
current to flow and that also describes perfectly well the experiment
that we just saw. So those two different phenomenon that is to say
this, loop stationary and magnet moving and this,
magnet stationary and loop moving are actually two completely distinct
independent phenomenon that have completely different explanations.
When Albert Einstein saw that he said look guys, you just got to be
kidding any yoyo can see that those two things are the same thing.
//\\\||///\\ ,------------------------------------
//| |\\ ( Look guys, you got to be kidding, any )
|[ | <q><p> | ]| ( yoyo can see that those two things )
|||| .\. |||| o O ( are the same thing. )
|||< _ >||| o '------------------------------------'
\__(_)_/ o o
_____!___!_____
| | \ / | |
| | _ \./ | |
| |[_] | | |
| | o | |
| | | | |
| | o | |
|__| | |__|
WW| o |WW
| | |
| o |
|____|____|
| | |
| | |
| | |
|___|___|
\_/ \_/ (art from others)
So it was this simple little experiment that was really the starting
point of the theory of relativity, not the Michelson-Morley
experiment. Not
some exotic experiment to detect the motion of the Earth through the
ether. But this simple little phenomenon that of course everybody knew
about, but which disturbed nobody else , except , Albert Einstein. And
what disturbed Einstein was not that we had difficulty explaining this
phenomenon this equation explains them perfectly in every case. What
disturbed Albert Einstein was the lack of inner perfection of the
theory and what he did in response was to produce a theory the Special
Theory of Relativity which had just that kind of inner perfection.
--- text quoted from THE MECHANICAL UNIVERSE ---
The inner perfection
How many people can see that the Successor Axiom of the Peano Axiom
System is a Series of endless adding 1
such as 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + .....
is the same Series
as the Series definition of what a P-adic Integer, (an Infinite
Integer)
is.
a_0 x p^0 + a_1 x p^1 + a_2 x p^2 + ....
What does this mean? It means that Naturals are the P-adic Integers and
that
the old mathematics of Finite Integers was an imprecise, a foggy,
unclear concept. Just as Newtonian Mechanics was wrong and a fake, so
also is the Naturals = Finite Integers a fakery. Quantum Mechanics
replaced Newtonian Mechanics as the true physics. So also, will
Naturals = P-adic Integers replace the fakery that is Finite Integers.
But this simple little phenomenon that of course everybody knew about,
but which disturbed nobody else, except, Archimedes Plutonium. And what
disturbed AP was not that we had difficulty proving simple math
problems as ancient as the ancient Greeks this phenomenon this
identicalness of the Series of the Successor Axiom, identical to the
Series of p-adic definition explains them perfectly in every case. What
disturbed AP was the lack of inner perfection of the theory and what he
did in response was to produce a theory the Naturals = P-adic Integers
=
Infinite Integers which had just that kind of inner perfection.
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this thread.
These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.