Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme
ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 10 Aug 2002.
 _   _                     _        _             _     _           
| | | |___  ___ _ __   ___| |_     / \   _ __ ___| |__ (_)_   _____ 
| | | / __|/ _ \ '_ \ / _ \ __|   / _ \ | '__/ __| '_ \| \ \ / / _ \
| |_| \__ \  __/ | | |  __/ |_   / ___ \| | | (__| | | | |\ V /  __/
 \___/|___/\___|_| |_|\___|\__| /_/   \_\_|  \___|_| |_|_| \_/ \___|
[GG] (was: Re: Damn google groups)

[GG] (was: Re: Damn google groups)

alt.ascii-art · 13 messages · 10 Aug 2002 - 19 Aug 2002
Xlo0772 <nos...@thevoid.dk> ASCII art 10 Aug 2002 10:07 · permalink 
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 01:52:17 +0200, Jake Patterson wrote:

> Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel <dan...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> but they are OT in this group, and suck after a while,
> 
> I disagree.  It is art, and the materials used are ASCII code, therefore it
> is ASCII art even of some people don't like it.  Of course most of it
> sucks, but that is true of conventional ASCII art as well, and for that
> matter, it is true of any other kind of art.

You may think it's art, others may not. Thats the nature of art.

I hoped I could find something in http://www.ascii-art.de/ascii/faq.html
under "section 13 - What to NOT post to alt.ascii-art?", but I couldn't
realy find anything solid argument against it. 
So I guess you are right. It can be considered ascii-art. *sigh*

Therefore especcially for you amigo, I have done some art. 
Hope you like it. If you find it obnoxious, you may hate me personally, I'm
a collector.

here goes...

to...
SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
 AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
 AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
 AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
 AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
or not to amsp...
    |
     |
     + \
     \\.G_.*=.
      `( '/.\|
       .>' (_--.
    _=/d   ,^\
   ~~ \)-'   '
      / |
     '  '   a:f

>> so *please* add [GG] to Google Groups
>> Pictures, so everybody who doesn't want to view them, can filter them.
> 
> That certainly seems resonable.

I guess so. If they realy can't be shoved back, that will have to do.

/xlo
StfoReK <i.a...@from.pl.rec.ascii-art> 10 Aug 2002 10:45 · permalink 
 ^@@^
.-()-.  Pewnego dnia, za siedmioma g�rami i siedmioma rzekami
\)__(/  Xlo0772 przem�wi�(a) ludzkim g�osem:  



: SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
:   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
: AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
:  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
: SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
:   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
: AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
:  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
: SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
:   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
: AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
:  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
: SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
:   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
: AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
:  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 


 Hey, it's not spam but curly water :)


       StfoReK

-- 
    .g88a.     Ma|: Niestety aby przeczytac informacje :|@wp.pl
   d8    8b    'S|: zawarte w tej sygnaturce - musisz! :|259894
   T8    8P    Gl|: posiadac ukonczone 18 lat. Do tego :|250035
    'T88P"     Ad|: czasu nie zaspokoisz ciekawosci... :|85.net
Kjell Arne Steinsvik <spa...@volda.org> 10 Aug 2002 11:41 · permalink 
Den Sat, 10 Aug 2002 01:52:17 +0200 tastet "Jake Patterson"
<jpa...@gnu.uvm.edu> f�lende:

> Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel <dan...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> but they are OT in this group, and suck after a while,
> 
> I disagree.  It is art, and the materials used are ASCII code, therefore
> it is ASCII art even of some people don't like it.  Of course most of it
> sucks, but that is true of conventional ASCII art as well, and for that
> matter, it is true of any other kind of art.

I have to disagree with you here ;)
Sure it is ASCII characters being used, but the characters alone are just
a bunch of letters making no sense. You need Google to colour the
characters to bring out the picture. And since when is colours considered
ASCII? This looks more like ANSI art than ASCII art if you ask me.
True ASCII art can be seen without Google.

-Kjell Arne Steinsvik
kje...@volda.org
Xlo0772 <nos...@thevoid.dk> 10 Aug 2002 14:39 · permalink 
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:45:54 +0200, StfoReK wrote:
> 
>
>                                 Ooooh spaamo mio...
> :                             .'
> :                            _        :--..----.
> :                      \   o')        |spamboat|
> :                       ;-._:         |-.__.---'
> :                        \  |       _,: 
> :             ':-:._______\/|____,-'.'            
> :               '-.__.____.\__.__,-'         
> :  AMsp amSPAM              \.       amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
> : SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP    '      AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
> :   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
> : AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
> :  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
> : SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
> :   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
> : AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
> :  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
> 
> 
>  Hey, it's not spam but curly water :)
> 

of course :0)
lament <ord...@yahoo.com> ASCII art 11 Aug 2002 01:07 · permalink 
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 04:41:29 -0700, Kjell Arne Steinsvik wrote:

> Den Sat, 10 Aug 2002 01:52:17 +0200 tastet "Jake Patterson"
> <jpa...@gnu.uvm.edu> f�lende:
> 
>> Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel <dan...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> but they are OT in this group, and suck after a while,
>> 
>> I disagree.  It is art, and the materials used are ASCII code,
>> therefore it is ASCII art even of some people don't like it.  Of course
>> most of it sucks, but that is true of conventional ASCII art as well,
>> and for that matter, it is true of any other kind of art.
> 
> I have to disagree with you here ;)
> Sure it is ASCII characters being used, but the characters alone are
> just a bunch of letters making no sense. You need Google to colour the
> characters to bring out the picture. And since when is colours
> considered ASCII? This looks more like ANSI art than ASCII art if you
> ask me. True ASCII art can be seen without Google.

I think it's very simple. It's HTML art.

In conventional HTML art, you add color and font tags to the page;
with Google Groups, Google adds it for you - but the result is the
same, an HTML page that you need a browser to view. Google is just
a novel method of producing such art.

And the FAQ says that HTML art is off-topic...

-- 
<(oO)>  Cthulhu       ()  ASCII ribbon campaign     \ \/ \/\/\ \/ \/\/
 /||\   Fhtagn!       /\    against HTML mail       /\/\./\/\/\/\./\/\
llizard <lli...@NOPOLLUTIONwildmail.com> ASCII art 11 Aug 2002 13:15 · permalink 
In article <pan...@yahoo.com>, lament
<ord...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 04:41:29 -0700, Kjell Arne Steinsvik wrote:
>
>> Den Sat, 10 Aug 2002 01:52:17 +0200 tastet "Jake Patterson"
>> <jpa...@gnu.uvm.edu> f�lende:
>> 
>>> Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel <dan...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> ["Jake Patterson" wrote] but they are OT in this group, and suck
>>>> after a while,
>>> 
>>> I disagree.  It is art, and the materials used are ASCII code,
>>> therefore it is ASCII art even of some people don't like it.  Of course
>>> most of it sucks, but that is true of conventional ASCII art as well,
>>> and for that matter, it is true of any other kind of art.
>> 
>> I have to disagree with you here ;)
>> Sure it is ASCII characters being used, but the characters alone are
>> just a bunch of letters making no sense. You need Google to colour the
>> characters to bring out the picture. And since when is colours
>> considered ASCII? This looks more like ANSI art than ASCII art if you
>> ask me. True ASCII art can be seen without Google.
>
>I think it's very simple. It's HTML art.
>
>In conventional HTML art, you add color and font tags to the page;
>with Google Groups, Google adds it for you - but the result is the
>same, an HTML page that you need a browser to view. Google is just
>a novel method of producing such art.
>
>And the FAQ says that HTML art is off-topic...

Actually, this can be seen without Google and without adding any colours.
I stuck it into a word document and reduced the fixed width font size to
3. There is an indistinct face there. If you change all the "eo" into "EO"
then the face becomes more distinct. Change all the "ao" into "+-" and the
face becomes even more distinct. Change all the "au" into "!~" and there
is a definite face there. Change "ae" to "AE" and "ee" to "EE". I think it
definitely falls under the broad category of ASCII-art and so is on-topic.
If you don't like it, just ignore the threads that have "google group" in
the title. 

Here is Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel's altered portrait now clearly a face
(at least I think it's clear)

aa AE ai +- !~ ea EE ei EO "quick google self portrait"

AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE 
AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE ei ei ei AE ei ei ei AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE 
AE AE AE AE AE AE AE AE ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei AE AE AE AE AE AE 
AE AE AE AE AE AE AE ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei AE AE AE AE AE AE 
AE AE AE AE AE AE ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei AE AE AE AE AE 
AE AE AE AE AE ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei AE AE AE AE 
AE AE AE AE AE ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei +- ei ei ei ei AE AE AE AE 
AE AE AE AE ei ei ei ei ei +- +- ei ei +- +- +- +- +- ei ei ei AE AE AE 
AE AE AE AE ei ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei AE AE AE 
AE AE AE ei ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei AE AE 
AE AE AE ei ei ei ei !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei AE AE 
AE AE AE ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei ei !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei ei !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei ei !~ +- ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- ei ei +- +- +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei ei +- ei ei ei ei ei ei +- ei ei ei ei ei +- +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei ei +- +- +- ei +- +- +- +- +- +- ei +- +- +- +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei ei !~ +- ei ei ei +- +- +- +- ei ei ei +- +- +- ei ei ei AE 
AE AE ei !~ ei !~ +- ei ei ei +- !~ +- +- ei ei ei +- +- +- ei +- ei AE 
AE AE ei !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- ei !~ +- ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei AE 
AE AE ei !~ +- !~ +- !~ ei ei +- ei +- +- ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- ei AE 
AE AE ei !~ !~ +- +- !~ +- !~ +- ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei AE 
AE AE ei !~ +- !~ +- +- +- +- +- ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei AE 
AE AE ei !~ !~ +- !~ +- !~ +- +- ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei ei AE 
AE AE ei ei +- +- +- +- !~ !~ ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei AE AE 
AE AE AE ei !~ !~ !~ +- +- +- ei ei +- ei +- +- +- +- +- +- +- ei AE AE 
EE EE EE ei +- +- !~ +- !~ +- ei ei ei ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- ei EE EE 
EE EE EE ei !~ !~ +- +- ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei +- +- +- +- EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE +- +- !~ ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei ei +- +- +- EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE !~ !~ !~ ei ei !~ +- +- +- +- +- !~ ei ei +- +- +- EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE +- !~ +- +- +- !~ !~ !~ !~ !~ !~ !~ +- +- +- +- +- EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE EE +- !~ +- +- +- !~ !~ !~ !~ !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE EE +- +- !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- !~ +- EE EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE EE !~ !~ +- +- +- +- +- !~ +- +- +- +- !~ +- +- EE EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE EE +- !~ !~ !~ +- +- +- ei +- +- +- +- !~ +- +- EE EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE EE !~ +- !~ !~ !~ !~ !~ ei !~ !~ !~ !~ +- +- +- EE EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE EE +- !~ !~ !~ ei ei !~ ei !~ ei ei +- +- +- +- EE EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE EE !~ +- !~ +- !~ +- ei ei ei +- +- +- +- +- +- EO EE EE EE 
EE EE EE EE EE EO !~ +- !~ !~ !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- EO EO EO EO EE 
EE EE EE EO EO EO EO !~ +- !~ +- !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- +- EO EO EO EO EO 
EO EO EO EO EO EO EO !~ !~ +- !~ +- +- +- +- +- +- +- EO EO EO EO EO EO 
EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO !~ !~ +- !~ +- +- +- +- +- EO EO EO EO EO EO EO 
EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO +- !~ +- !~ +- +- +- +- EO EO EO EO EO EO EO 
EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO !~ +- !~ +- +- +- +- EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO 
EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO !~ +- !~ +- +- EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO 
EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO !~ +- +- EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO 
EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO 
EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO EO 

Designed by aqGoogle

-- 
  _____|_____                      ASCII-art & ASCII-animation
 | ,nHHHHHh. |              llizard aka ejm llizard@idirec+.ca
 |,HHHH'HHHH.|          www.crosswinds.net/~llizard/ascii-art/
 |H ,-. ,-. H|
 |H  *!  *  H|
 |`   !__   ,| ~---,        ha
 |  ,=====`  |      \_,^%--- ha  I tried to do a reduction
 |     !     |       />  \ ha    of Dr. Jeckyl... perhaps
 |   `=!='   |   ___/ >          this is "Mr. Hyde" now
_|___________|_ (# o) >      
      /|\        '-~ /|^^
     / | \   ejm     | \

If you are e-mailing and hit the reply button, add an "e" to "idirct"
Jake Patterson <jpa...@elk.uvm.edu> 11 Aug 2002 15:53 · permalink 
llizard <lli...@nopollutionwildmail.com> wrote:

> Here is Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel's altered portrait now clearly a face
> (at least I think it's clear)

Um, that was mine, not Jackel's :-)

-- 
  Yet another     Yet another     Yet another     Yet another     Yet another
 lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)      l
3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig
Stephan Hensel <inf...@infocore.net> ASCII art 11 Aug 2002 17:41 · permalink 
On 11 Aug 2002 15:53:25 GMT
Jake Patterson <jpa...@elk.uvm.edu> wrote:

> llizard <lli...@nopollutionwildmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Here is Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel's altered portrait now clearly a
> > face(at least I think it's clear)
> 
> Um, that was mine, not Jackel's :-)
> 
> -- 
>   Yet another     Yet another     Yet another     Yet another     Yet
>   another
>  lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)
>       l
> 3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!     
> 3D .sig

every sender of this crap will be added to my killfile.

        _____________                 _____________               
         `-._    ..::|                 `-._    ..::|       .      
             `.  ..::|                     `.  ..::|      /|      
              |  ..::|                      |  ..::|     /.|      
              |  ..::|   _____              |  ..::|    / :|      
    .--------.|  ..::|.-'  ..::-.--. .------|  ..::|   / .:|      
    | /\    .::. ..:.'       ..::`. '       |  ..::|  / .::| /\   
    |/  \    .::\../           ..::\        |  ..::| / ..::|/  \  
.---'    '---..::bd        _    ..::b.._    |  ..::|/ ..---'    '---.
 `-.      .-' .::PI     .:(_)   ..::m   )   |       ..::`-.      .-'
   /      \  ..:/.q             ..::w  /   .|       .:'   /      \
  /_.-``-._\..:' ..\           ..::/  /   .:|       ''---/_.-``-._\
  ' |  ..:.`  |  ..:`.       ..::,'  /   .::|            ..:.     `
    |  ..:|   |  ..::|`-.__..::-':| /  .::' |  ..:::|`.   ..:\
    |  ..:J  ,'  ..:::.   ,'   ..::/ ..:'  ,'  ..::::. )   .::b
    | ..:/  /____..::::\ /____...:/ .:'   /____..:::::/   ..::P
    |.:,'                        /.:'                /  ..:::' 
    |,'                         /.'                 / ..:-'    
    '                          '                   /,-'     
                                                  '

-- 

lou
Jake Patterson <jpa...@elk.uvm.edu> 11 Aug 2002 18:08 · permalink 
Stephan Hensel <inf...@infocore.net> wrote:

>> -- 
>>   Yet another     Yet another     Yet another     Yet another     Yet
>>  lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)
>> 3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!     

> every sender of this crap will be added to my killfile.

Sorry, I didn't realize that steriographic sigs were so frowned upon here ;)
Stephan Hensel <inf...@infocore.net> 11 Aug 2002 20:01 · permalink 
On 11 Aug 2002 18:08:51 GMT
Jake Patterson <jpa...@elk.uvm.edu> wrote:

> Stephan Hensel <inf...@infocore.net> wrote:
> 
> >> -- 
> >>   Yet another     Yet another     Yet another     Yet another    
> >Yet>  lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)      lame (TM)     
> >lame (TM)> 3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D .sig!      3D
> >.sig!     
> 
> > every sender of this crap will be added to my killfile.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't realize that steriographic sigs were so frowned upon
> here ;)
> 

blah, wrong reply. i am talking about this google shit not your sig.

lou
llizard <lli...@NOPOLLUTIONwildmail.com> ASCII art 11 Aug 2002 21:46 · permalink 
In article <aj619l$rt4c$2...@swen.emba.uvm.edu>, Jake Patterson
<jpa...@elk.uvm.edu> wrote:

>llizard <lli...@nopollutionwildmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Here is Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel's altered portrait now clearly a face
>> (at least I think it's clear)
>
>Um, that was mine, not Jackel's :-)

Oops. Sorry about that, Jake. This is what comes of trying to decipher
things without actually looking at the whole thread (I had already purged
out several posts)

  _____|_____ 
 | ,nHHHHHh. |
 |,HHHH'HHHH.|
 |H ,-. ,-. H|
 |H  *!  *  H|
 |`   !__   ,|        
 |  ,=====`  |        ,^%--- 
 |     !     |       />\ \ Of course it simply ruins my little 
 |   `=!='   |   ___/ > \  Dr.Jekyll/Mr.Hyde joke.    
_|___________|_ (# o) >  `---~    
      /|\        '-~ /|^^
     / | \   ejm     | \

Mind you, the portrait really doesn't look much like a Mr.Hyde, does it?
He's far too benign looking.
 
  _____|_____ 
 | ,nHHHHHh. |
 |,HHHH'HHHH.|
 |H ,-.V,-. H|
 |H  *!  *  H|
 |`   !__   ,|        
 |  ,vvvvv`  |        ,^%--- 
 |     !     |       />\ \ Maybe now it is more Mr.Hyde like?
 |   `=!='   |   ___/ > \   
_|___________|_ (# o) >  `---~    
      /|\        '-~ /|^^
     / | \   ejm     | \

-- 
ASCII-art & ASCII-animation  >%^7^^^7^^
llizard aka ejm llizard@idirec+.ca
www.crosswinds.net/~llizard/ascii-art/

If you are e-mailing and hit the reply button, add an "e" to "idirct"
Philip Newton <pne...@newton.digitalspace.net> 18 Aug 2002 18:28 · permalink 
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:07:36 +0200, Xlo0772 <nos...@thevoid.dk>
wrote:

> SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
>   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
> AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
>  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
> SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
>   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
> AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
>  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
> SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
>   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
> AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
>  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
> SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
>   AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
> AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
>  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 

I'm really bad at these "Magic Eye" 3-D thingies. What's it supposed to
be? ;)

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <nos...@gmx.li>
That really is my address; no need to remove anything to reply.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Joe Koperski <joe...@gmx.de> 19 Aug 2002 10:54 · permalink 
Philip Newton <pne...@newton.digitalspace.net> wrote...
>On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:07:36 +0200, Xlo0772 <nos...@thevoid.dk>
>wrote:

<diddle>
>>SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
>>  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
>>AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
>> AMsp amSP AMsp amSPAMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp aSP AMsp  aSP AMsp  amSP 
>>SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMspamSP  AMspamSP  AM am SP AMspam SP AMspam
>>  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMspamSP  AMspamSP  AMspmS P  AspamS P  AspamSP 
>>AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMspamSP  AMspamSP  AMspamP   AMsamSP   AMpamSP
>> AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMspamSP  AMspamSP  AMspaSP   AMpamSP   AMspamSP 
>>SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMspamSP  AMspamSP  AMsam SP AMspam SP AMspam
>>  AMsp amSP AMsp amSPAMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp mSP AMs pamSP AMs p amSP 
>>AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
>> AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
>>SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am
>>  AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
>>AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP
>> AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP 
>
</diddle>
 
>I'm really bad at these "Magic Eye" 3-D thingies. What's it supposed to
>be? ;)

"3 D" 

;)

Joe

-- 
Wenn Superkleber wirklich �berall klebt, warum nicht an der 
Innenseite der Tube?

Gratis spielen: http://www.joekoperski.de
About this thread. These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2002 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
« [DIDDLE] lousy attempt to diddle the face Nerd Boy, Episode 262 »