Re: [GG] (was: Re: Damn google groups)
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 01:52:17 +0200, Jake Patterson wrote: > Daniel 'Dr.Jekyll' Jackel <dan...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> but they are OT in this group, and suck after a while, > > I disagree. It is art, and the materials used are ASCII code, therefore it > is ASCII art even of some people don't like it. Of course most of it > sucks, but that is true of conventional ASCII art as well, and for that > matter, it is true of any other kind of art. You may think it's art, others may not. Thats the nature of art. I hoped I could find something in http://www.ascii-art.de/ascii/faq.html under "section 13 - What to NOT post to alt.ascii-art?", but I couldn't realy find anything solid argument against it. So I guess you are right. It can be considered ascii-art. *sigh* Therefore especcially for you amigo, I have done some art. Hope you like it. If you find it obnoxious, you may hate me personally, I'm a collector. here goes... to... SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP SP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp am AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP AMsp amSP or not to amsp... | | + \ \\.G_.*=. `( '/.\| .>' (_--. _=/d ,^\ ~~ \)-' ' / | ' ' a:f >> so *please* add [GG] to Google Groups >> Pictures, so everybody who doesn't want to view them, can filter them. > > That certainly seems resonable. I guess so. If they realy can't be shoved back, that will have to do. /xlo
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,a448e6ae745d2f9d,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-10 02:41:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.162.153.118!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail From: Xlo0772 <nos...@thevoid.dk> Subject: Re: [GG] (was: Re: Damn google groups) Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:07:36 +0200 Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art References: <kvh...@4ax.com> <aiu...@ID-63899.user.dfncis.de> <aj1kjh$ovel$1...@swen.emba.uvm.edu> User-Agent: Pan/0.11.3 (Unix) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Comment-To: "Jake Patterson" <jpa...@gnu.uvm.edu> Lines: 61 Message-ID: <3d54dfc4$0$51557$edf...@dspool01.news.tele.dk> Organization: TDC Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.224.25 X-Trace: 1028972484 dread05.news.tele.dk 51557 80.62.224.25 X-Complaints-To: abu...@post.tele.dk Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:18883
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2002 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.