Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal

 Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets a
 handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.

 Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
 for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such folks
 to positions where they gain access to our kids.
 
 http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244

bob&carole wrote:
>  Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal

>  Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets a
>  handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
> 
>  Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
>  for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such folks
>  to positions where they gain access to our kids.

Actually, you *do* need to wake up.  *And* get educated.  Homosexuals
prefer the company of men.  Pedophiles prefer children.

Yea, another idiot with no life  minding someone else's business with 
slander..
"F.H." <con...@verizon.net> wrote in message 
news:RDHVg.1584$wE5.763@trnddc02...
> bob&carole wrote:
>>  Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal
>
>>  Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
>> men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets a
>>  handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
>>
>>  Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
>>  for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such folks
>>  to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>
> Actually, you *do* need to wake up.  *And* get educated.  Homosexuals
> prefer the company of men.  Pedophiles prefer children. 

On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 21:12:37 +0200, in alt.politics.homosexuality
Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen <new...@ceejay.cjb.NOSPAMnet>
<4527fbbb$0$84030$edf...@dtext01.news.tele.dk> wrote:

>| none2u wrote:
>| > Yea, another idiot with no life  minding someone else's business with 
>| > slander..
>| > "F.H." <con...@verizon.net> wrote in message 
>| > news:RDHVg.1584$wE5.763@trnddc02...
>| >> bob&carole wrote:
>| >>>  Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal
>| >>>  Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
>| >>> men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets a
>| >>>  handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
>| >>>
>| >>>  Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
>| >>>  for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such folks
>| >>>  to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>| >> Actually, you *do* need to wake up.  *And* get educated.  Homosexuals
>| >> prefer the company of men.  Pedophiles prefer children.
>| 
>| This thread was crossposted all over the usenet - Please keep this thread in
>| alt.politics.homosexuality


But, but, but B&C needs all the attention s/he can get :-)

BTW, it is only 'polite' to inform the readers that you have set
followups to your response. Because you failed to do so, I've
re-inserted all the groups :-P
---------------------------------------------------------------
jno...@yourpantsyahoo.com.au  : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------

bob&carole wrote:
> Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets a
>  handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
>
>  Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
>  for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such folks
>  to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>
>  http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244


Exactly right. Many Homosexuals like the young men under 18. I dont
know if its "typical" but it certainly is common.

However, on this AA newsgroup, you arent going to get many to see there
is anything wrong with the homosexual lifestye.

In case you didnt know it, the AA Big Book (see story entitled
"Tightrope")   and the GSO
website give their stamp of approval on homosexuality.

Modern AA is sick. You cant get those caught up in it to see it though,
for the most part.

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<b><font size=+1>HELLO GOOGLE ABUSE DEPARTMENT:</font></b><b><font size=+1></font></b>
<p><b><font size=+1>Suggest you terminate the service of these morons who
like to SPAM multiple newsgroups with their twisted thinking. Or maybe
you can pay their way into an alcohol recovery program, the hiding place
of all morons looking for a copout. "Its everyone and everytings's fault
except my own. I'M NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR MY OWN ACTIONS!!!"</font></b><b><font size=+1></font></b>
<p><b><font size=+1>B&amp;C Lover</font></b>
<br><b><font size=+1></font></b>&nbsp;
<p>bob&amp;carole wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>&nbsp;Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal
<p>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<p>&nbsp;Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
<br>men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets
a
<br>&nbsp;handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
<p>&nbsp;Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
<br>&nbsp;for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such
folks
<br>&nbsp;to positions where they gain access to our kids.
<p>&nbsp;<a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244">http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244</a></blockquote>
</html>

tedw wrote:
>
> Exactly right. Many Homosexuals like the young men under 18. I dont
> know if its "typical" but it certainly is common.
>
> However, on this AA newsgroup, you arent going to get many to see there
> is anything wrong with the homosexual lifestye.
>
> In case you didnt know it, the AA Big Book (see story entitled
> "Tightrope")   and the GSO
> website give their stamp of approval on homosexuality.
>
> Modern AA is sick. You cant get those caught up in it to see it though,
> for the most part.

But really, Ted Wegener, when you post, you should issue a disclaimer
that you are a self-admitted child abuser who once burned the penis of
a 10-year-old boy.  And you should link, as I have below, to the very
site where you publicly state this.  This lets people know who you
REALLY are.  Ted Wegner's own words, as written by Ted Wegener himself:

"When I was about 10 years old an accident happened that is worth
telling. It was popular at the time to pants someone. A group of boys
would find someone they didn't like and pants them to humiliate them.
I was with a group of boys who ran across a boy in our neighborhood,
Jim T., and they decided to pants him. After they got him down on the
ground they pulled his pants and underwear down exposing his genitals.
I was already a smoker and I was seized by the impulse to burn him on
the genitals with a lit cigarette and proceeded to do so. His face
grimaced in pain and he burned with resentment towards me."


Nice, huh?  He's never apologized for it, has no remorse, and get this:

 he BLAMES HIS MOTHER!  Of course, it wasn't his MOTHER who
extinguished a cigarette on the penis of a 10-year-old boy who had been

restrained by a group of monsters.  It was Ted Wegener, "Christian".


http://www.facesandvoicesofrecovery.org/about/story_wegener.php

_.-In alt.ascii-art, nuc...@hotmail.com wrote the following -._
><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

I was ignoring these crossposts to alt.ascii-art, but now I can't.
Please don't post in MIME.  People in the MIME newsgroups don't post
in MIME because even they know you shouldn't post to usenet with
MIME.  

-- 
=()==()==()==()==()- http://fauxascii.com 
  \   \   \   \   \   \  ASCII artist
 :F_P:-O- -O- -O- -O- -O- -O-  -O- 
 \  \   \   \   \   \   \   \    \

[TRIMMED most of the x-posted newsgroups, only leaving the group I saw it in and the more 
obvious targets for the original spam.]

In article <452...@hotmail.com>,  wrote:
> <b><font size=+1>HELLO GOOGLE ABUSE DEPARTMENT:</font></b><b><font size=+1></font></b>

       A waste of breath and electrons.
       Use the web to find a physical address for your local Google affiliate. E.G. 
google.co.uk tells me that the "google London office" is at "United Kingdom Sales Office / 
18 Soho Square / London W1D 3QL / United Kingdom / phone: 0-207-025-8010 / fax: 
0-207-681-1995" (on page http://www.google.co.uk/press/pressrel/ukoffice.html).

       Now, Google don't (yet) care about their user's abuse of USENET because it doesn't 
affect Google's normal operations. Their abuse mail autoresponder can handle a lot of mail. 
But, their physical office on the other hand is used to getting physical mail containing 
things like bills for toilet paper and rent demands. They have to look at these letters. And 
they have to find these important letters in the mountain of spam that they get through the 
door. This costs them money.
       
       So, print out the offending spam (costs you a couple of pennies), hand-write on it why 
it is an offense against nettiquette, stick it in a re-used physical spammer's envelope (costs 
you nothing), put a far-too-low physical stamp onto it (costs you pennies again - or a penny), 
address the envelope to Google's physical address, and drop it in the post.
       It will arrive at Google's physical address, with a demand for payment. If it get's 
immediately thrown in the bin, the Post Office will still be demanding payment (they deliver 
under-paid mail in the UK, but demand extra payment, and most companies *have* to pay because 
it *could* be important genuine mail that has lost a stamp in the post. It happens.). A human 
will almost certainly have to look at it (costing Google around a pound if they spend more 
than a few seconds looking at it). It will clog up their business. It will raise their costs. 
It will hurt their bottom line. And eventually Google's bean counters will tell Google's 
programmers to do something about the damned nuisance.
       
       It's going to take a time. But I can tell you that dropping one of these spams into the 
post box every week makes the heart feel much better than you'd expect for spending 5 pennies.

> <p><b><font size=+1>Suggest you terminate the service of these morons who
> like to SPAM multiple newsgroups with their twisted thinking. Or maybe
> you can pay their way into an alcohol recovery program, the hiding place
> of all morons looking for a copout. "Its everyone and everytings's fault
> except my own. I'M NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR MY OWN ACTIONS!!!"</font></b><b><font size=+1></font>
>
       Google's advertising and sales divisions are responsible for the (in-)actions of 
Google's Groups programmers. Make *them* pay.

-- 
 Aidan 

In article <BPfWg.32894$iA5.5203@dukeread11>, Faux_Pseudo wrote:
> I was ignoring these crossposts to alt.ascii-art, but now I can't.
       So was I.

> Please don't post in MIME.
>
       As far as I can tell, he's not. The message had no MIME 
divisions etc by the time it got to me, it was just pure HTML. So, 
broken in several ways.
       Does Tran have anything to say on the nocturnal habits of 
Google's Groups programmers? Involving a large cactus and some 
chilli-based personal lubricant?
       
-- 
 Aidan Karley, FGS
 Aberdeen, Scotland
 Written at Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:33 +0100, but posted later.

Faux_Pseudo wrote:
> _.-In alt.ascii-art, nuc...@hotmail.com wrote the following -._
> ><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
>
> I was ignoring these crossposts to alt.ascii-art, but now I can't.
> Please don't post in MIME.  People in the MIME newsgroups don't post
> in MIME because even they know you shouldn't post to usenet with
> MIME.
>
> --
> =()==()==()==()==()- http://fauxascii.com
>   \   \   \   \   \   \  ASCII artist
>  :F_P:-O- -O- -O- -O- -O- -O-  -O-
>  \  \   \   \   \   \   \   \    \

tedw wrote:
> bob&carole wrote:
> > Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >  Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> > men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets a
> >  handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
> >
> >  Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
> >  for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such folks
> >  to positions where they gain access to our kids.
> >
> >  http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244
>
>
> Exactly right. Many Homosexuals like the young men under 18. I dont
> know if its "typical" but it certainly is common.
More common then the homosexuals would have us believe.
>
> However, on this AA newsgroup, you arent going to get many to see there
> is anything wrong with the homosexual lifestye.
>
> In case you didnt know it, the AA Big Book (see story entitled
> "Tightrope")   and the GSO
> website give their stamp of approval on homosexuality.
>
> Modern AA is sick. You cant get those caught up in it to see it though,
> for the most part.
how sad...........

bobandcarole wrote:

> > >  Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> > > men, he likes young teen boys. We should pray for him that he gets a
> > >  handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
> > >
> > >  Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical behavior
> > >  for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate such folks
> > >  to positions where they gain access to our kids.
> > >
> > >  http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244
> >
> >
> > Exactly right. Many Homosexuals like the young men under 18. I dont
> > know if its "typical" but it certainly is common.
> More common then the homosexuals would have us believe.

No more common than heterosexuals, that's men that like little
girls under 18. You don't seem to be worried about these.
Wonder why? Are you one of them, is that why you have this
tendency to overlook the heterosexual pedophile?

> > However, on this AA newsgroup, you arent going to get many to see there
> > is anything wrong with the homosexual lifestye.
> >
> > In case you didnt know it, the AA Big Book (see story entitled
> > "Tightrope")   and the GSO
> > website give their stamp of approval on homosexuality.
> >
> > Modern AA is sick. You cant get those caught up in it to see it though,
> > for the most part.
> how sad...........

Everyone can see through you, any road.

--

Fritz ...



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
      ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem

ScottyFLL wrote:
> tedw wrote:
> >
> > Exactly right. Many Homosexuals like the young men under 18. I dont
> > know if its "typical" but it certainly is common.
> >
> > However, on this AA newsgroup, you arent going to get many to see there
> > is anything wrong with the homosexual lifestye.
> >
> > In case you didnt know it, the AA Big Book (see story entitled
> > "Tightrope")   and the GSO
> > website give their stamp of approval on homosexuality.
> >
> > Modern AA is sick. You cant get those caught up in it to see it though,
> > for the most part.
>
> But really, Ted Wegener, when you post, you should issue a disclaimer
> that you are a self-admitted child abuser who once burned the penis of
> a 10-year-old boy.

post proof or shut the fuck up, faggot


  And you should link, as I have below, to the very
> site where you publicly state this.  This lets people know who you
> REALLY are.  Ted Wegner's own words, as written by Ted Wegener himself:
>
> "When I was about 10 years old an accident happened that is worth
> telling. It was popular at the time to pants someone. A group of boys
> would find someone they didn't like and pants them to humiliate them.
> I was with a group of boys who ran across a boy in our neighborhood,
> Jim T., and they decided to pants him. After they got him down on the
> ground they pulled his pants and underwear down exposing his genitals.
> I was already a smoker and I was seized by the impulse to burn him on
> the genitals with a lit cigarette and proceeded to do so. His face
> grimaced in pain and he burned with resentment towards me."
>
>
> Nice, huh?  He's never apologized for it, has no remorse, and get this:
>
>  he BLAMES HIS MOTHER!  Of course, it wasn't his MOTHER who
> extinguished a cigarette on the penis of a 10-year-old boy who had been
>
> restrained by a group of monsters.  It was Ted Wegener, "Christian".
> 
> 
> http://www.facesandvoicesofrecovery.org/about/story_wegener.php