Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 27 Nov 2001.
_ _ _ _ _ _ | | | |___ ___ _ __ ___| |_ / \ _ __ ___| |__ (_)_ _____ | | | / __|/ _ \ '_ \ / _ \ __| / _ \ | '__/ __| '_ \| \ \ / / _ \ | |_| \__ \ __/ | | | __/ |_ / ___ \| | | (__| | | | |\ V / __/ \___/|___/\___|_| |_|\___|\__| /_/ \_\_| \___|_| |_|_| \_/ \___|
Informatic Departament UTFSM, Valparaiso Chile
alt.ascii-art
· 13 messages · 27 Nov 2001 - 6 Dec 2001
[34m __�[40;33;01m������g_�[0m
[34m _��`[40;33;01m �@@@t 7���[0m [31mRedHat 7.1[0m (Seawolf) Kernel \r en un \m
[34m ���[40;33;01m �� ��[0m [34mLaboratorio de Computaci�n
[34m����[40;33;01m �Ѹ �_g���[0m [34mDepartamento de Inform�tica UTFSM[0m
[34m ����a_[40;33;01m ���������`[0m
[34m 7ѮѮ��g__,- [0m
This is our /etc/issue
Do you like it?
The original logo is in http://www.inf.utfsm.cl
Greetins to all!
--
.----.
_.'__ `. Mauricio Vergara Ereche mav...@inf.utfsm.cl
.--(#)(##)---/#\ Estudiante Ing. Civil Inform�tica UTFSM, Valpara�so
.' @ /###\ Phones: 32 864672 891...@entelpcs.cl
: ##### counter.li.org: #188365 Vi�a del Mar, CHILE
`-..__.-' _.-\###/ http://www.inf.utfsm.cl/~mave007 ICQ: 15864728
"Mauricio Vergara Ereche" <mav...@polanco.inf.utfsm.cl> wrote in message news:9u06rr$lc7$1...@manutara.inf.utfsm.cl... > [34m __�[40;33;01m������g_�[0m > [34m _��`[40;33;01m �@@@t 7���[0m [31mRedHat 7.1[0m (Seawolf) Kernel \r en un \m > [34m ���[40;33;01m �� ��[0m [34mLaboratorio de Computaci�n > [34m����[40;33;01m �Ѹ �_g���[0m [34mDepartamento de Inform�tica UTFSM[0m > [34m ����a_[40;33;01m ���������`[0m > [34m 7ѮѮ��g__,- [0m > > This is our /etc/issue > Do you like it? > The original logo is in http://www.inf.utfsm.cl I can't watch ANSI colourcoded textart on my computer (not without installing more program to see it) .. but I just got an idea .. wouldn't it be fairly simple to do a ANSI-art viewer in JavaScript ?
Oswiadczenie Mauricio Vergara Ereche brzmi: [http://www.inf.utfsm.cl/etc/issue] > Do you like it? > The original logo is in http://www.inf.utfsm.cl hmm, nice but ansi :-) clean ascii logo would look like this: __���g_� _��` �@@@t 7��� RedHat 7.1 (Seawolf) Kernel ��� �� �� Laboratorio de Computaci�n ���� �Ѹ �_g��� Departamento de Inform�tica UTFSM ����a_ ���������` 7юю��g__,- and imagine that left and bottom part is blue, and the rest is yellow. also last 2 lines are blue, and RedHat 7.1 is red. #v+ if you like RH7.1 type that: echo $'\x1B\x5B\x31\x3B\x33\x31\x6D\x52\x65\x64\x1B\x5B\x31\x3B\x33\x37\x6D\x68\x61\x74\x1B\x5B\x30\x3B\x33\x37\x6D\x20\x66\x6f\x72\x45\x56\x45\x52' (this should be in one line!) :-) (that is not a virus) #v- __ greetz!!! ## ## Triteno, another RH user :-) ## ## ## ##eiq ## ## ,d@@@@@@b.## ## . -- d@@"##""g@@@@@@D##@g" dp' ## `"@@@%P##" Any complaints: abuse@127.0.0.1 "' %% %% ## Sent by Triteno ...(my fingerprint :P) '' '' %% Bob_R tri...@poland.com http://tri10o.republika.pl ''
On 28 Nov 2001 07:04:56 GMT, Triteno <tri...@poland.com> wrote: >Oswiadczenie Mauricio Vergara Ereche brzmi: >[http://www.inf.utfsm.cl/etc/issue] >> Do you like it? >> The original logo is in http://www.inf.utfsm.cl > >hmm, nice but ansi :-) > >clean ascii logo would look like this: > > __???????g_� > _??` ?@@@t 7??? RedHat 7.1 (Seawolf) Kernel > ??? ?? ?? Laboratorio de Computaci�n >�??? ??� �_g??? Departamento de Inform�tica UTFSM > �???a_ ?????????` > 7??????g__,- . . . /|\ /|X|\ `---'-'------------------------------. | nope this is no clean ascii... what's this? -- \\\||/// ,-----------------. | -- --| ( ....z.zz.zzZzZZzZ ) INSOMNIA part 7 |(__)_)| `-----------------' soon to be revealed | _) | _____,' alt.ascii-art
Oswiadczenie Peter "lastfuture" Marquardt brzmi: >> __???????g_� >> _??` ?@@@t 7??? RedHat 7.1 (Seawolf) Kernel >> ??? ?? ?? Laboratorio de Computaci�n >>�??? ??� �_g??? Departamento de Inform�tica UTFSM >> �???a_ ?????????` >> 7??????g__,- > . . . > /|\ /|X|\ > `---'-'------------------------------. > | > nope this is no clean ascii... what's this? ups, you're right, on my computer these "?" chars are mostly N, Z or c with dashes or dots over them. I think it was soft-converted :) or it is in extended ascii, but not sure... it's something like that: (really clean ascii :-)) __rZSSSZcg_� _ZN` C@@@t 7ZZz RedHat 7.1 (Seawolf) Kernel ZNN NN NN Laboratorio de Computaci�n �NNE NN� �_gNNN Departamento de Inform�tica UTFSM �ZNNa_ NNNNNNNNN` 7NZNZccg__,- __ ## ## ## ## ## ##eiq ## ## ,d@@@@@@b.## ## . -- d@@"##""g@@@@@@D##@g" dp' ## `"@@@%P##" Any complaints: abuse@127.0.0.1 "' %% %% ## Sent by Triteno ...(my fingerprint :P) '' '' %% Bob_R tri...@poland.com http://tri10o.republika.pl ''
On 28 Nov 2001 20:20:09 GMT, Triteno <tri...@poland.com> provoked the following text: >it's something like that: (really clean ascii :-)) Not yet, but you're getting there. > __rZSSSZcg_� > _ZN` C@@@t 7ZZz > ZNN NN NN >�NNE NN� �_gNNN > �ZNNa_ NNNNNNNNN` > 7NZNZccg__,- I have put arrows to point to the places where there's still some non-ASCII chars. __rZSSSZcg_�<== This one _ZN` C@@@t 7ZZz ZNN NN NN Here ==>�NNE NN� �_gNNN <== And inside the enclosure there are 2 more And here=>�ZNNa_ NNNNNNNNN` 7NZNZccg__,- Keep up the drawing! It looks good, but you have still got to take care not to use non-ASCII chars. -- Peter Punk \ / ---\\\\--- / \ Castrate my email adress to reply. Blore's Razor: Given a choice between two theories, take the one which is funnier.
Oswiadczenie Donderfliegen brzmi: > __rZSSSZcg_�<== This one > _ZN` C@@@t 7ZZz > ZNN NN NN > Here ==>�NNE NN� �_gNNN <== And inside the enclosure there are 2 more > And here=>�ZNNa_ NNNNNNNNN` > 7NZNZccg__,- how about it now: __rZSSSZcg_ _ZN` C@@@t 7ZZz ZNN NN NN "NNE NN_ _gNNN "ZNNa_ NNNNNNNNN` 7NZNZccg__,- __ ## ## ## ## ## ##eiq ## ## ,d@@@@@@b.## ## . -- d@@"##""g@@@@@@D##@g" dp' ## `"@@@%P##" Any complaints: abuse@127.0.0.1 "' %% %% ## Sent by Triteno ...(my fingerprint :P) '' '' %% Bob_R tri...@poland.com http://tri10o.republika.pl ''
On 1 Dec 2001 08:15:32 GMT, Triteno <tri...@poland.com> provoked the following text: >Oswiadczenie Donderfliegen brzmi: >> __rZSSSZcg_�<== This one >> _ZN` C@@@t 7ZZz >> ZNN NN NN >> Here ==>�NNE NN� �_gNNN <== And inside the enclosure there are 2 more >> And here=>�ZNNa_ NNNNNNNNN` >> 7NZNZccg__,- >how about it now: > > __rZSSSZcg_ > _ZN` C@@@t 7ZZz > ZNN NN NN >"NNE NN_ _gNNN > "ZNNa_ NNNNNNNNN` > 7NZNZccg__,- It looks good now, but... (oh, here he is, complaining again...) Those 2 dashes in your sig, you know they are intended to enable most newsreaders to automagically remove the sig? In order to do that, the first line of the sig can only contain two dashes, followed by a single space. Extending the sig upwards like you did causes newsreaders to leave the sig in thus missing its purpose alltogether. Don't get me wrong, your sig looks good, but you might as well have left out the two dashes all the same. > __ > ## ## > ## ## ## > ##eiq ## ## > ,d@@@@@@b.## ## . >-- d@@"##""g@@@@@@D##@g" > dp' ## `"@@@%P##" >Any complaints: abuse@127.0.0.1 "' %% %% ## >Sent by Triteno ...(my fingerprint :P) '' '' %% Bob_R >tri...@poland.com http://tri10o.republika.pl '' -- Peter Punk \ / ---\\\\--- / \ Castrate my email adress to reply. Non-critical-error: Press <ALT-CTRL-DEL> to continue ...
Oswiadczenie Donderfliegen brzmi: > Those 2 dashes in your sig, you know they are intended to enable most > newsreaders to automagically remove the sig? In order to do that, the first > line of the sig can only contain two dashes, followed by a single space. > Extending the sig upwards like you did causes newsreaders to leave the sig > in thus missing its purpose alltogether. > Don't get me wrong, your sig looks good, but you might as well have left out > the two dashes all the same. yup, i know that :-) and currenty i'm preparing a patch for slrn[*], which will accept my new standard of signature :-) Yeah, now i feel like Bill Gates, making standards is so funny :-))) And afaik correct signature delimiter is not "-- ", but "-- \n" (line end) __ ## ## [*] slrn is unix news reader, but ported ## ## ## to windows... ##eiq ## ## ,d@@@@@@b.## ## . -- d@@"##""g@@@@@@D##@g" dp' ## `"@@@%P##" Any complaints: abuse@127.0.0.1 "' %% %% ## Sent by Triteno ...(my fingerprint :P) '' '' %% Bob_R tri...@poland.com http://tri10o.republika.pl ''
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC), Triteno <tri...@poland.com> provoked the following text: >> Extending the sig upwards like you did causes newsreaders to leave the sig >> in thus missing its purpose alltogether. >> Don't get me wrong, your sig looks good, but you might as well have left out >> the two dashes all the same. > >yup, i know that :-) >and currenty i'm preparing a patch for slrn[*], which will accept my >new standard of signature :-) <g> Don't forget to patch all other newsreaders that can snip away sigs. :-) >Yeah, now i feel like Bill Gates, making standards is so funny :-))) >And afaik correct signature delimiter is not "-- ", but "-- \n" (line >end) And what ASCII control char would that be then? Just curious. >[*] slrn is unix news reader, but ported ## ## ## >to windows... ##eiq ## ## So is XNews :-) -- __ ___ / ) _/_ _(_ /'_ _ _ /(_/()/)(/(-/ / (/(-(/(-/) _/ Castrate me to reply by e-mail Bylaw states that no more than 3.5 inches of water is allowed in a bathtub. (Canada, Etobicoke City Law)
On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 10:38:06 +0000, drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> provoked the following text: >>yup, i know that :-) >>and currenty i'm preparing a patch for slrn[*], which will accept my >>new standard of signature :-) >>Yeah, now i feel like Bill Gates, making standards is so funny :-))) >>And afaik correct signature delimiter is not "-- ", but "-- \n" (line >>end) >> __ >> ## ## >>[*] slrn is unix news reader, but ported ## ## ## >>to windows... ##eiq ## ## > >Where can you get the Windows version? http://slrn.sourceforge.net/ -- __ ___ / ) _/_ _(_ /'_ _ _ /(_/()/)(/(-/ / (/(-(/(-/) _/ Castrate me to reply by e-mail Software is mind work. Having the right frame of mind is essential.
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 09:22:59 +0000, drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> provoked the following text: >>>> __ >>>> ## ## >>>>[*] slrn is unix news reader, but ported ## ## ## >>>>to windows... ##eiq ## ## >>> >>>Where can you get the Windows version? >> >>http://slrn.sourceforge.net/ > >Hmmm...I'm not touching anything from sourceforge. Beggars can't be choosers. -- __ ___ / ) _/_ _(_ /'_ _ _ /(_/()/)(/(-/ / (/(-(/(-/) _/ Castrate me to reply by e-mail Adultery or Fornication (living togeather while not married or having sex with someone that is not your spouse) results in a fine of $500 and/or 6 months in prison. (Mississippi state law -Sec. 97-29-1)
Oswiadczenie Donderfliegen brzmi: >>and currenty i'm preparing a patch for slrn[*], which will accept my >>new standard of signature :-) > > <g> Don't forget to patch all other newsreaders that can snip away sigs. :-) eee, no, then i will make it worldwide standard, and all other newsreaders will have to accept it ;) __ ## ## ## ## ## ##eiq ## ## ,d@@@@@@b.## ## . -- d@@"##""g@@@@@@D##@g" dp' ## `"@@@%P##" Any complaints: abuse@127.0.0.1 "' %% %% ## Sent by Triteno ...(my fingerprint :P) '' '' %% tri...@poland.com http://tri10o.republika.pl ''
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
__ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) \__\/\/__/ /O /==\ O\ (;O/ \/ \O;)
_______ |.-----.| || jgs || ||_ _|| `--)-(--` __[=== o]___ |:::::::::::|\ `-=========-`()
,sSSs ,SSSS_/ ,_ sS/`))\// sS//|_(_/ _, SS\\\ `""-.-'` / sSS` jgs-==-'`'-._\
___________ | _______ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |_______| | |___________|
//O\\
|\/\/\/| | | | | | (o)(o) C _) | ,___| | / /____\
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this thread.
These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2001 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.