Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 7 Nov 1999.
_ _ _ _ _ _ | | | |___ ___ _ __ ___| |_ / \ _ __ ___| |__ (_)_ _____ | | | / __|/ _ \ '_ \ / _ \ __| / _ \ | '__/ __| '_ \| \ \ / / _ \ | |_| \__ \ __/ | | | __/ |_ / ___ \| | | (__| | | | |\ V / __/ \___/|___/\___|_| |_|\___|\__| /_/ \_\_| \___|_| |_|_| \_/ \___|
ASCII Art Fart for Sun, Nov 07, '99
alt.ascii-art
· 14 messages · 7 Nov 1999 - 11 Nov 1999
What a moron. Has this idiot ever actually come out with anything
remotely funny? Or even original (art wise)?
_.-'< <'-._
.-' _ > remove YOUR BRA to email > '-.
.-' _.-' '-._ '-.
/ .-' '-. \
/.-' '-.\
// .---. ..... ____ \\
// _____| |/____ `. _.-' `. \\
|| . . \ .' _.-'', : ||
|| '_____ _____'\ \ . .' (__) ||
|| .''. | | \ / / | | .''. ||
\\ /| | \ \\ /`' /__ ___| | | |\ //
|| | .---._ \ \\/"- | )( ) | | ||
|| | / ----./ /| |_ (__) | ' __ | ||
|| | | / \__. Y ) . | \__.-' ) | ||
\| | `-.----.___/\______/\_/`---'/ /\ _.-' | |/
\| | .'\.----.\ \ `"""' | |/
'..' \ / '..'
\.--""""--./
> What a moron. Has this idiot ever actually come out with anything > remotely funny? Or even original (art wise)? I have only been in this group for a few weeks now but I have'nt seen anything funny as of yet .. He seems to be obsessed with gay people too .. I don't see that there is anything funny about mocking the gays. In fact - I very thankful that there is such a thing as gay men .. For every gay man that is one less man to compete you for the women. HOORAY for gays ! .. lesbians however should be punished :) Also he never replies to any questions .. I am beginning to think he's a very well programmed bot - that would explain the total lack of humor. - CJ -- When I was young we did'nt ,---. _,-=-._ ,-- have websites like this. | | ,' _____ `. .---------------------------. | | '=(-o=o-)=' ( CeeJay Central ) \,(O)./ \(_)/ ( http://CeeJay.marmoset.net/ ) (-o-o-) )"( '---------------------------' \(_)/ """ When I was young we did'nt --' )"( even have electricity! """
>He seems to be obsessed with gay people too .. I don't see that there is >anything funny about >mocking the gays. >In fact - I very thankful that there is such a thing as gay men .. >For every gay man that is one less man to compete you for the women. HOORAY for >gays ! .. >lesbians however should be punished :) Yes I agree all lesbian should be punished, they should be sentenced to spend the night with me (at the same time) in my bedroom as a severe punishment. >Also he never replies to any questions .. I am beginning to think he's a very >well programmed >bot - that would explain the total lack of humor. Either that or he hasn't the brain to work out the question, that would also explain the lack of humour ;o) __________________________________________________ / On the inside, were all of the same interior// \ |Frail human hearts can only take so many hate filled| \ darts before Things start to Fall Apart// / \ -Doctrane / \ .----------------------------------. / \ / JAY C - Remove YOUR BRA to email \ / | / _________________ \ | / / | _____________ | \ \ \/ | | | | \/ __________________ _|_|_____________|_|_ ___________________ | ______ | | ______ | | .dP####9b. SONY .dP####9b. | | .d##########b. ________________ .d##########b. | | .d############b. | TAPE CASETTE | .d############b. | | :8############8: | ____________ | :8############8: | | '9############P" | | | | '9############P" | | "9##########P" | |____________| | "9##########P" | | "9a######eP" |________________| "9a######eP" | | '""""""' [__][__][__][__] '""""""' | |__________________|_____________________|___________________|
Jay C the presbyter wrote: > > What a moron. Has this idiot ever actually come out with anything > remotely funny? Or even original (art wise)? He/she does not post any original art but he/she does read the group as evidenced by the use of recent art.He/she has made some VERY funny captions for some of the ascii he/she posts. You can view the archive here: http://www.alcyone.com/buffoon/index.html -- |"""""<`.THE PRINCE ,'>"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""| | `.`/""""""\,',' my sig is too big, | |SEE HIS ( / \ \' SEE HIS but its really cool. | | FACE \/<> <>\/ SMILE | | / W \ Visit my ascii art site: | | ,'\_|||||_/`. http://www.gtcom.net/~krogg/ascii/ | | ,',' ||| `.`. kro...@gtcom.net | |____<,' TIME TO DIE `.>____Remove no.to.spam to reply____|
> )__( > (66) > _/\/ )__( > * / \ (oo) > \_ / <^-.\----\/ > ((_ )| " || > > >`||----|| > \ \ vv vv > ` ` > > HardC0Wre *LOL* ! You should send this in to whomever maintains the cow archive.. BTW where can the complete be found - I have a large list but it's not complete
Tran Q. Nguyen wrote: > (__) )__( vv vv > (oo) (oo) ||----|| * > /-------\/ *-------\/ || | / > / | || / | || /\-------/ > * ||----|| / ||----|| (oo) > ^^ ^^ vv vv (~~) > > USA Cow Nerd USA Cow EXTREMELY GAY COW )__( (66) _/\/ )__( * / \ (oo) \_ / <^-.\----\/ ((_ )| " || > >`||----|| \ \ vv vv ` ` HardC0Wre
Ool wrote: > > > You should send this in to whomever maintains the cow archive.. > ^^^^^^^^ > Is that syntactically correct? Inquiring minds want to know. No. The word in question is the subject of a dependent clause. The clause is the object of the preposition "to." So the clause would be in the objective case if clauses had case. Pronouns do have case, and the subject of a clause is in the nominative. So it should be "whoever"? We've done this before, most recently about a week ago. Bob Lieblich
> > You should send this in to whomever maintains the cow archive.. > ^^^^^^^^ > Is that syntactically correct? Inquiring minds want to know. I believe so. But i guess you could say whoever too. Let's have some people with english as their native language answer this one.
Robert Lieblich <lie...@erols.com> wrote in message news:382...@erols.com... > Ool wrote: > > > You should send this in to whomever maintains the cow archive.. > > ^^^^^^^^ > > Is that syntactically correct? Inquiring minds want to know. > No. The word in question is the subject of a dependent clause. The > clause is the object of the preposition "to." So the clause would be in > the objective case if clauses had case. Pronouns do have case, and the > subject of a clause is in the nominative. So it should be "whoever"? Thanks. I thought so, too, but I wasn't quite sure. > We've done this before, most recently about a week ago. Sorry for crossposting. -- ___ __ __ "Muscles of All Limbs, Unite! / _ / _( ) You Have Nothing to Lose But Your Sinews." ( (_( (_))(__ \___\__(____) �OOL mcmxcix
Robert Lieblich <lie...@erols.com> wrote in message news:382...@erols.com... > Ool wrote: > > > You should send this in to whomever maintains the cow archive.. > > ^^^^^^^^ > > Is that syntactically correct? Inquiring minds want to know. > No. The word in question is the subject of a dependent clause. The > clause is the object of the preposition "to." So the clause would be in > the objective case if clauses had case. Pronouns do have case, and the > subject of a clause is in the nominative. So it should be "whoever"? I stand corrected. But when _can_ you use "whom" ?
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999 15:36:19 +0100, "Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen" <REM...@CeeJay.findhere.com> wrote: > >Robert Lieblich <lie...@erols.com> wrote in message news:382...@erols.com... >> Ool wrote: > >> > > You should send this in to whomever maintains the cow archive.. >> > ^^^^^^^^ >> > Is that syntactically correct? Inquiring minds want to know. > >> No. The word in question is the subject of a dependent clause. The >> clause is the object of the preposition "to." So the clause would be in >> the objective case if clauses had case. Pronouns do have case, and the >> subject of a clause is in the nominative. So it should be "whoever"? > >I stand corrected. > >But when _can_ you use "whom" ? AAAAAHHH!!! The fine points of grammar attack us again! m�spher. You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
> You should send this in to whomever maintains the cow archive..
^^^^^^^^
Is that syntactically correct? Inquiring minds want to know.
--
___ __ __ "Muscles of All Limbs, Unite!
/ _ / _( ) You Have Nothing to Lose But Your Sinews."
( (_( (_))(__
\___\__(____) �OOL mcmxcix
In article <80c106$kmd$1...@news.inet.tele.dk>,
"Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen" <REM...@CeeJay.findhere.com>
wrote:
> But when _can_ you use "whom" ?
Whom am I speaking to? Whom do you wish to speak to?
Whom are you buying this gift for?
Whom have you told? Give me a list of everyone whom you have told.
You should apologize to whomever you have insulted.
You might find it helpful to look at a reference such as Strunk
and White.
Ananda
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Anandashankar Mazumdar wrote: > > In article <80c106$kmd$1...@news.inet.tele.dk>, > "Christian 'CeeJay' Jensen" <REM...@CeeJay.findhere.com> > wrote: > > > But when _can_ you use "whom" ? > > Whom am I speaking to? Whom do you wish to speak to? > Whom are you buying this gift for? > Whom have you told? Give me a list of everyone whom you have told. > You should apologize to whomever you have insulted. Well done, Ananda. In case the poster gets confused by this last one, "whomever" in that instance is in the objective case because it serves as the direct object within the subordinate clause of which it is a part. De-inverted, that clause says "You have insulted whom," "whom" being the direct object of "insulted." Change the grammar of the clause so that the relative pronoun is the subject and you get something like: "You should apologize to whoever was insulted by you." > > You might find it helpful to look at a reference such as Strunk > and White. Better yet, and easy to understand, is Patricia O'Conner's *Woe is I*. Bob Lieblich
About this thread.
These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1999 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.