Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 21 Aug 1998.
 _   _                     _        _             _     _           
| | | |___  ___ _ __   ___| |_     / \   _ __ ___| |__ (_)_   _____ 
| | | / __|/ _ \ '_ \ / _ \ __|   / _ \ | '__/ __| '_ \| \ \ / / _ \
| |_| \__ \  __/ | | |  __/ |_   / ___ \| | | (__| | | | |\ V /  __/
 \___/|___/\___|_| |_|\___|\__| /_/   \_\_|  \___|_| |_|_| \_/ \___|
Munged apostrophes in articles

Munged apostrophes in articles

alt.ascii-art · 1 message · 21 Aug 1998
On 18 Aug 1998 23:02:37 -0500, ah...@chinet.chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman) wrote:

>In article <slr...@rama.escnd1.sdca.home.com>,
>David M. Cook <dav...@home.com> wrote:
>>This is a problem I've seen more and more in the last few months: some other
>>code like 0x92 insttead of 0x27 in place of apostrophes.  Since the
>>culprits see the apostrophes with their software it's hard to convince them
>>there is a problem.
>
>>Any suggestions on what is causing this, at least so I have some ammunition
>>when trying to get people to fix the problem?  Or perhaps there's a
>>technical fix?

>Several browsers that allow posting to news use incorrect character code
>sets, including Microsoft products and the latest Netscape.

Oh Yikes!  That's just what we need.  :-(

>The technical fix is to beat these people over the head till they use real
>clients for news and e-mail.

How does one do that effectively?

Bye,

About this thread. These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post