Re: some ascii of mine
From Ilmari Karonen <ilt...@sci.invalid>
· alt.ascii-art
· 20 Nov 2000 00:00 · View full thread
· report
In article <3A1...@hotmail.com>, Veronica Karlsson wrote: > >Here are some examples (from Joan's list, under "personal exhibits", >first the page URL, then the URL of a screen shot from it): Since everyone else (okay, I'm exaggerating) seems to be commenting on this list, let me see if I can actuallly say something constructive to help fix those pages: >http://users.breworld.net/m/martin.atkins/asciiart/ >http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/temp/proportional1.gif Oops, I think *I* might be to blame here. The style sheet for those pages specifies "monospaced" as the last font family for PRE, when it should really be "monospace" without the "d". I know I've posted CSS samples here that have this bug, though with Deja's archive being the way it is, I can't be sure if I started was the first to spread the particular piece of misinformation. >http://www.geocities.com/theshedragon/ >http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/temp/proportional2.gif This one has FONT tags within PRE. It _is_ technically a standards violation, though I'm surprised that Netscape should break on it. The proper solution would be CSS. That's not the only thing broken on those pages -- the JavaScript seems to break Netscape is various ways too, such as making links not work, but I'm not going to start trying to fix that. >http://home9.inet.tele.dk/jez/ >http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/temp/proportional3.gif An unclosed FONT tag _before_ PRE. Again, technically an error, but I wouldn't have expected it to matter. Easily fixed by removing it. If you want to specify the font for ascii art in HTML, use style sheets. >http://www.gtcom.net/~krogg/ascii/ >http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/temp/proportional4.gif Same as above. >http://www.angelfire.com/mn/Maija/asciiart.html >http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/temp/proportional5.gif Okay, that's just a CSS font family spec without a catch-all entry. Add "monospace" after "Courier New" and it should work even if none of the named fonts are present. >Going through that list I stumbled on another interesting phenomenon: > >http://209.220.139.116/tooshy/indexts.html >http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/temp/what_happened_here.gif Now that's just ugly. Ascii art in HTML should *always* be marked up with <PRE> tags. Anything else is a kluge at best. -- Ilmari Karonen - http://www.sci.fi/~iltzu/ "Maybe I shouldn't be singing this song / Ranting and raving and carrying on / Maybe they're right when they tell me I'm wrong... NAAAAH!" -- Denis Leary, _Asshole_
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,8877ada74b07555c X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Ilmari Karonen <ilt...@sci.invalid> Subject: Re: some ascii of mine Date: 2000/11/20 Message-ID: <974...@itz.pp.sci.fi>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 695708442 References: <8ujp4l$cob$1...@news1.xs4all.nl> <8ukeck$q63$1...@news.inet.tele.dk> <8ukpdp$g3f$1...@news1.xs4all.nl> <t7k...@4ax.com> <3A1...@hotmail.com> <b4k...@4ax.com> <3A1...@hotmail.com> X-Complaints-To: new...@saunalahti.fi X-Trace: tron.sci.fi 974718236 12169 195.74.0.20 (20 Nov 2000 11:03:56 GMT) Organization: (dis)Order of the Holy Spoon (or whatever) User-Agent: postit.pl 0.05 Reply-To: Ilmari Karonen <use...@itz.pp.sci.fi> NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Nov 2000 11:03:56 GMT Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.