Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 20 Jan 2000.
Re: Moon Rise Animation (pics 1-4)

Re: Moon Rise Animation (pics 1-4)

On 20 Jan 2000 17:01:39 GMT, ott...@aol.com (Incognito) provoked the
following text:

>>Ah, so you are an engineer (slash) programmer, eh?
>I've done a bit (or would that be a byte? ;)

So did i, in BASIC, on the C=64. I once made a scandisk-like program, and it
even worked! :-)

><and>
>>Programmer - a device for converting coffee into programs
>LOL, the truth is out!

I was wondering, do you have some administrator-tags lying around somewhere?

>Great list, some I had not heard before.

And in a way it _is_ ASCII-art :-)
-- 
        Peter Punk
          \    /
        ---\\\\---
          /    \

Supercomputer: Turns CPU-bound problem into I/O-bound problem. - Ken Batcher

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,5dedf23bc363825
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: ppu...@damnthatspam.hetnet.nl (Peter Punk)
Subject: Re: Moon Rise Animation (pics 1-4)
Date: 2000/01/20
Message-ID: <qlp...@4ax.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 575470222
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <kc6...@4ax.com> <200...@ng-da1.aol.com>
Organization: Total Disorganisation
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post