Re: .SIGS <READ PLEASE
In article <2bjnaf$mo...@usenet.rpi.edu>, Who wants to live forever if true love must die? <bil...@rpi.edu> wrote: > Umm, this is just MHO, but if you are going to continue to post >.sig files, then perhaps you should cut out the personal info of the people >that they came from? I don't know about you, but if I had a .sig file, I >would only want people that I sent e-mail to (ie, people I have an interest >in) in seeing it. Otherwise I would put it in my .plan This is an important point. What do people think? I agree that email sigs should require permission before re-posting, but what about news postings? I'm figuring that if I'm reposting a sig here, my intent is favorable, so it's okay... but I admit it's borderline... jorn
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,48284f64e55701f8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-11-07 13:59:41 PST Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ddsw1!not-for-mail From: jor...@Notwerk.mcs.com (Jorn Barger) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: .SIGS <READ PLEASE Date: 7 Nov 1993 15:57:45 -0600 Organization: MCSNet Subscriber, Chicago, IL Lines: 15 Message-ID: <2bjr0q$rn...@Notwerk.mcs.com> References: <2bjnaf$mo...@usenet.rpi.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cluster.mcs.com
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1993 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.