Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 17 Nov 2001.
Re: help
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:32:29 GMT, fra...@gnb.ca (Francois
Richard) wrote:

> What is the anscii-code for superscript 3. I want a charakter that 'real' 
> is.

No superscript 3 in ASCII.

(It's 179 in Latin-1/iso-8859-1 and Windows-1252 "Western", however.)

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <nos...@gmx.li>
That really is my address; no need to remove anything to reply.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,5f837101987df767
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-17 05:40:16 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!skynet.be!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dialup006.picon.DE!not-for-mail
From: Philip Newton <pne...@newton.digitalspace.net>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: help
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:42:53 +0100
Organization: very little
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <b7k...@4ax.com>
References: <915B9C645francoisrichardgnbca@198.164.200.20>
Reply-To: "Philip 'Yes, that's my address' Newton" <nos...@gmx.li>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup006.picon.de (62.214.2.6)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1006004414 550278 62.214.2.6 (16 [11583])
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:10772
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post