Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 29 Nov 2001.
Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions

Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions

"T. Max Devlin" <tma...@voicenet.com> wrote in message
news:t9n...@4ax.com...
> Strolling through comp.os.linux.advocacy, I heard CeeJay say:
>    [...]
> >      _ PEBKAC ??          _cc=.=_
> >     (_|  O               '^^`).,  `.____
> >     [__]_ )_|             `"" '\( ,_.-'`
> >     |   |d| |                   `\\
> >
> >You can do several other good variations on the eyes using other chars.
>
> That was really terrific.  I tried to re-emphasize the ponytail.
>
>
> --
>          _aa=.=_           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
>         '^^`).,  `.____    & Beer is proof      &
>          `"" '\( ,_.-'`    & that God loves us  &
>                `\\         &   - Ben Franklin   &
>                             &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

I can see that .. I think you did a good job, now the t-rex have a ponytail , a
small goatee and you could also view the aa's as glasses .. success - A 4-line
t-rex with glasses, goatee and ponytail!

You also cut away a _ from it's back .. I don't know if this was by accident or
not , but by leaving it blank you give the appearence of a more smooth curve.
I like it. Some will see it as a hole in the back though.

          _aa=.=_           .--------------------.
         '^^`)., `._____    | Beer is proof      |
          `"" '\( ,_.-'`    | that God loves us  |
                `\\         |   - Ben Franklin   |
                            `--------------------'

I wanted to make add the _ char but found out that if you adjusted the other
chars to fit then you get a slimmer T-REX .. you can use this sometime in spring
when you have shaked the winter-fat.

       _aa=.=__         .--------------------.
      '^^`).,  `.____   | Beer is proof      |
       `"" '\( ,_.-'`   | that God loves us  |
             `\\        |   - Ben Franklin   |
                        `--------------------'

Here is the big T-REX again.

Btw :

.------------------------.
| Hangovers are proof    |
| that the devil haven't |
| forgotten about us     |
|   - CeeJay             |
`------------------------'

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,7f5aceb0d0bd9864
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,36007fb8a27ab4b7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-29 06:11:46 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail
From: "CeeJay" <use...@ceejay.cjb.NOSPAMnet>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <3BF...@cumulus.com> <3C0...@hotmail.com> <7v4...@4ax.com> <3C0...@hotmail.com> <uls...@4ax.com> <3C0...@hotmail.com> <3tg...@4ax.com> <3C0...@hotmail.com> <0bp...@4ax.com> <Pin...@adfpc.amp.uni-hannover.de> <3c04e1b4$0$89812$edf...@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <t9n...@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:12:43 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <3c064221$0$222$edf...@dspool01.news.tele.dk>
Organization: TDC Internet
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.243.165.226
X-Trace: 1007043105 dread02.news.tele.dk 222 62.243.165.226
X-Complaints-To: abu...@post.tele.dk
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11915 comp.os.linux.advocacy:149437
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post