Re: um
Eric wrote: > >I take it Dutch is a bit different than German? > > German is a Dutch dialect. > > Eric > (donning flame proof suit now ;-) :) No need. I always wanted to speak a dialect. Just wondering what all those Dutch people are doing here. Something wrong with the Dutch TV program lately? :) ( Andreas ( ) .___. ,-. __) NC + a:f \|/ //===\\ ,-' o `-!| .'+^+`. //=|_|=\\ ,-'---------`-. .'///|\\\`. //=======\\ | [+] [+] | .-------------. //////|\\\\\\ //|||'"`|||\\ | ___ | < huff, puff > /((|||^..|||))\ |||||.^ ||||| | | | // `--v----------' ((|||(oo)|||) |||||o) ||||| | |' | |..~~~O { ~vv' ASCII Dictionary : | - http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~freise >O< Alt.Ascii-Art FAQ : - http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~freise/ascii/faq.html
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,b7197e3e2f505496 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Andreas Freise <ad...@mpq.mpg.de> Subject: Re: um Date: 1997/11/29 Message-ID: <348...@mpq.mpg.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 293628481 References: <347c0c32-kwalker@WWIV-BBS> <348...@news.xs4all.nl> Organization: Rechenzentrum der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft in Garching Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.