Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 16 May 1994.
Re: DIS: rec vs alt (Please Read)

Re: DIS: rec vs alt (Please Read)

Scott Nelson:
>it's a big win for rec.arts.ascii, but alt.ascii-art will suffer, consider;
>The quality of alt.ascii-art will drop by some amount as talent leaves
>to post in rec.arts.ascii (moderated.)  

Easy to fix.  Just make sure that everything posted to rec.arts.ascii
is also crossposted to alt.ascii-art.
--

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,34dd300224bbc68d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-17 05:00:24 PST
Path: gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!psuvax1!psuvax1!flee
From: fle...@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: DIS: rec vs alt (Please Read)
Date: 16 May 1994 21:06:32 GMT
Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <FLE...@dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu>
References: <Cpt...@brunel.ac.uk> <2r5tt5$po...@fido.asd.sgi.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post