Re: Swastika apology
Robert Chao (rch...@netcom.com) wrote: >: I am sorry for posting that swastika. Please note that I do not support >: the Nazis and in fact I am not German or even Caucasian. It was just >: a historical symbol. >: I should have added something to the original posting instead of just >: drawing it but that's not the point now. Let's forget it and go back to >: having fun. If i am not wrong, the Nazi swastika is not the same as the eastern buddhist/hindu swastika. The arms are pointing the other way around. nazi: _ |_|_ _| | asian: _ _|_| | |_ -b y tang
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,da8b0c94050789ae X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-11-10 14:49:08 PST Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!warwick!unicorn.nott.ac.uk!unicorn.nott.ac.uk!not-for-mail From: ply...@unicorn.nott.ac.uk (Beng Tang) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Swastika apology Date: 10 Nov 1993 22:12:24 -0000 Organization: Cripps Computing Centre, University of Nottingham Lines: 22 Message-ID: <2brp08$3a...@unicorn.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk> References: <rch...@netcom.com> <2bq2md$rm...@usenet.rpi.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: unicorn.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1993 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.