Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 29 May 1998.
Purpose of alt.ascii-art (was: Re: Technology evolution and

Purpose of alt.ascii-art (was: Re: Technology evolution and ascii pics)

Colin Douthwaite wrote:
>...
> >
> > 3.  What goes on in the ASCII art discussion groups?
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     In the ASCII art discussion groups people discuss ASCII art,
> >     post ASCII pictures, post improved versions or variations of
> >     pictures other people have drawn, and generally have fun.
> 
> > Notice: the ASCII art *discussion* groups
> >
> > In the ASCII art discussion groups people *discuss* ASCII art, post
> > ASCII pic....
> >
> >I think that this sorta means that it is for both.
> 
> Yes, I think you have a very good point there.
> 
> Matthew Thomas considerably expanded that section of the FAQ
> compared with the Scarecrow original which allowed for:
> 
>         o Discussion about pieces of art.
>         o Questions and answers covering:
>           - Creating and viewing ASCII art.
>           - Locating FTP sites for ASCII art and related files.
> 
> Matthew Thomas however went much further than Allison and described
> the newsgroups as " the ASCII art discussion groups ".
> 
> Basically ALL newsgroups are regarded as discussion groups unless
> otherwise designated in their titles.

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear, what mess have I got myself into this time?
:-D

When I wrote this particular section of the FAQ, I based it not on what
Bob Allison had written, but on what had actually been going on (and had
seemed to be accepted) in alt.ascii-art for some time.

I changed all references to `newsgroups' to `discussion groups' in
version 2 of the FAQ for two reasons:
1.  that is what they are called by modern software such as Netscape
    Collabra (not to mention DejaNews)
2.  it makes more sense (well, how many groups actually discuss
    `news'?).

And really, there's not enough traffic on alt.ascii-art to have separate
alt.ascii-art.d[iscussion] and alt.ascii-art.pictures groups. (There's
not really enough traffic to have separate alt.ascii-art,
alt.ascii-art.animation, and rec.arts.ascii groups either, but that's
another story ...)

                ,---------------------.
   ,d888888b.   | I can't see any     |
  d8888888888b  | pictures either ... |
  | _,_  _._ |  `.,-------------------'
_,-' _< ,>_ `-. /
 _,-' .   ,`-. `.
'  \   `-'  / `. \
\   `-.__,-'  -' /mt-2

-- __
  /_/\   Matthew Thomas, Master of the Mail
 _\_\/_  My real address is mpt26 @ student . canterbury . ac . nz
/_/\/_/\ 
\_\/\_\/ THE ASCII ART FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/7373/faq.htm

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,cc07b6bb8d657c99
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Matthew Thomas <mpt...@spamfree.land>
Subject: Purpose of alt.ascii-art (was: Re: Technology evolution and ascii pics)
Date: 1998/05/29
Message-ID: <356...@spamfree.land>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 357523603
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <356...@sympatico.ca> <356...@spamfree.land> <356...@sympatico.ca> <dwi...@pm3-25.cybcon.com> <356...@on.spammer> <356...@news.vossnet.net> <896...@mnementh.southern.co.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: University of Canterbury (opinions expressed are my own)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post