Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 21 Nov 2001.
Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions

Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions

> >>I also run a linux box and a linux shell account so if anyone feels to
> >>need to convince of linux's superiority .. don't - I'm already a
> >>believer. I just use whatever OS suits the purpose.
> >
> >What purposed does XP suit that Linux doesn't? With Linux, stability
> >doesn't come at the expense of speed.
>
> Erm....Windows compatibility?  Oh, wait, there's Wine (www.winehq.com).

Uhh and it have perfect compatibility with all programs , right ? .. RIGHT ?

                 _____
               dP""``"""=oo,_
              JP           `"Yo_
              8'              `Yb.
             dP                 8'
             8'                dP
            d8.             __,8
            8:"o.      _,od8888'
           d8:::"8oooo88"::::dP
           8;:::::::::::::::dP
          d8:::::::::::::::;8'
          d0:::::::::::::::dP
          8[::::::::::::::dP
          8[:::::::::::::;8
          8[::::::::::::;8'
          Y8:::::::::::d8
          `88::::::::;8P
           `88:::::;8P'
             88888P'
             888P
             88'
            88'
           d8P
          d88[
,am.__  ,d888[
Y888888888888b
 `Y888888888888._
     `Y8888888888ba_
          `""Y888888p      CJ
                ``"'
( WINE logo - Ascii by yours truely)

WINE is good , but it's not THAT good.

There is still reason to run Windows until Linux can run all the programs
Windows can (and more) while being just as easy (or easier) to use and setup.

> Speed?  My understanding at this time is that XP is *slower* than
> Win2k -- and Win2k wasn't noted for its high speed, although it
> was faster than NT.

Yes .. by huge a 1 -> 3 percent - On MY maschine .. YMMV

You forgot about hardware compability btw.

Kind Regards
CeeJay

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,7f5aceb0d0bd9864
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,36007fb8a27ab4b7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-21 10:35:19 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.162.153.118!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail
From: "CeeJay" <use...@ceejay.cjb.NOSPAMnet>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <9t8jos$162...@OM9.omantel.net.om> <ieT4O14+FdnG=NfW=AFW...@4ax.com> <9tblsm$29f...@OM9.omantel.net.om> <3bfadc71$0$25360$edf...@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <pl5...@4ax.com> <slr...@lexideb.athghost7038suus.net>
Subject: Re: Hand Mafe vs Algorithmic Conversions
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:36:00 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <3bfbf3e6$0$219$edf...@dspool01.news.tele.dk>
Organization: TDC Internet
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.219.116
X-Trace: 1006367718 dread02.news.tele.dk 219 80.62.219.116
X-Complaints-To: abu...@post.tele.dk
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:11268 comp.os.linux.advocacy:145761
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post