Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 6 Jul 1997.
a collector's question

a collector's question

Hi,

after putting up my homepage with an Ascii collection several 
visitors suggested to change the way I organized it.

Now I wonder what you think, what you prefer.

I call mine the dictionary style : one file per keyword. 
So you can't read it like a book and you can't entertain yourself
by scrolling through one huge file. I don't do that very
often anyway. I found it to be more useful as an archive
this way. No?

_______________________________________________________________________
            .   .---_
      .       ,' ,'           Andreas Freise   .        .|'          *
  *          ,  :       .                              - * - .     .
          .  : *:  _          email  fre...@stud.uni-hannover.de
             :   `'-' _.:                                `
    .|        \ `--' ' .'     http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~freise/
   - * -    .  `-.__.-'     .                            .
_____|_________________________________________________________________

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,e788f0850f198dca,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Andreas Freise <fre...@stud.uni-hannover.de>
Subject: a collector's question
Date: 1997/07/06
Message-ID: <33C...@stud.uni-hannover.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 255178714
Organization: Universitaet Hannover
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post