Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 20 Oct 1997.
Re: REQ: a dork!

Re: REQ: a dork!


I'd like to apologise for my previous post on this thread. I can't have
been thinking too clearly. I wish I had an excuse but I don't...

Every time I look at the post, I cringe and get rather embarrassed, as the
people in the same computer room as me would lay testament to. (They 
are staring in this direction wondering why I've gone a rather bright  
shade of crimson.) I've also noticed, by re-reading *this* post, that my
grasp of advanced English grammar is rapidly disappearing too...

I think I need to get out more... :|

Erk... :( ,
Carl

-- 
Carl R White   | e-mail...:                    crw...@-comp.brad.ac.uk
               | finger...:             crw...@-dcsun1.comp.brad.ac.uk
               | web......: http://www.student.comp.brad.ac.uk/~crwhite/
Anti-Spam: Remove x's from header and change '-@-' to '@' in .sig 

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,5ecdee5991aa4c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: "Carl R. White" <crw...@comp.bradx.xac.uk>
Subject: Re: REQ: a dork!
Date: 1997/10/20
Message-ID: <Pin...@dcsun7.comp.brad.ac.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 281969129
References: <344...@total.net> <344...@oldstreet.agw.bt.co.uk> <JMD...@pantyfod.demon.co.uk> <344...@slip.net>
X-Sender: crw...@dcsun7.comp.brad.ac.uk
Organization: University of Bradford
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post