Re: [PIC] Shovel/spade

On 31 Aug 2003 05:55:28 -0700, ali...@yahoo.com (Alien Eggman) wrote:
8<
>
>
>For future referance, when should one add his/her own sig to the mix
>after a diddle? On the shield/badge I did, I left mine off because all
>I did was take one of jgs's pics and put it in the middle of the
>shovel...Should that count as sig worthy?
>
>I peronally don't really think so...because a diddle like that is
>minor to say the least...While it uses a bit of thought and
>imagination, very little personal creativity when into it (when
>compared to adding my own symbol into it, or like R@ineR's mask).
>
>Is there some kinda unwritten code of ethics on adding additional
>sigs...like a certain percentage changed or something? I've changed
>one or two lines on a few and left the original sig intact (not adding
>my own). Other time's I've changed like 98% of one by the time my
>diddle was done and just added my sig, even though you'd be hard
>pressed to see the original work.
>
>-Zot

the original/diddles sig theme has been discussed and is the suggested way
to do this. what might be included in the case where the addition to
the pic is not your own original work then could be:
 
original/diddled*
*added xyz by jgs

in the case where you say "98%" diddled, this sounds more like you 
reached the "new work based on" point.

.
 o
  O
   _
  (_)
    .-.
   :   :     _____
    `-'   .-'|| :.`-.
        .'||||| :::. `.
       /||||||| ::::.  \
      ;|||||||| ::::::. ;
      |       MJP          |
      ; "###### ========;
       \  "#### =======/
        `.  "## =====.'
          `-."# ==.-'   .-.
             `"""'     :   :
                        `-'_
                          (_)

                            O
                             o
                              .