Re: Miss Kitty.

Ditto to everything.

I made the crack about the objection... something like this...

"Miss Kitty has a moral objection to giving artists proper credit."

--
                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     a a r d v a r k o @ g e o c i t i e s dot com   ._______.
                                __    __  o         \| Ant   |
       _. _..__|   _.._|  _    /  \/\/  \/           | KRUNCH|
      (_|(_||(_|\/(_|| |<(_)   \__/\/\__/\o          | .*@., |
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /\ . ./\ rdv  .@*.   |  \=/  |
  http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/2672/   '"""""""'
                      icq 8435513
                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Andy Hood wrote in message ...
>Why do we have to start hate wars?
>I read in this group somebody (I'll look it up in Deja News) quoted
>something like:
>"Miss Kitty has an objection to posting with initials..."
>also
>"Miss Kitty has posted a picture with initials, realised, removed them,
>and later posted without initials".
>
>This second statement I shall check VERY carefully.  Not now, 'cos I
>don't have the time.
>
>You didn't directly deny it, so I assumed it was true.  You posted the
>kitten in a hand by ROW only days after the group had discussed the
fact
>that it DID belong to him.  That was rude.  I don't accept that you
>"didn't notice", because you obviously, like myself, read everything
>which comes through this ng.  You seem to be arguing that if you only
>knew who the pictures belonged to, you would post them with initials.
I
>find 18 cats/kittens without a single known author hard to believe when
>you read everything that comes through the group.
>
>You have proved how spiteful you are now, and frankly, bloody rude.  I
>don't want to start a war here.  How about this:  I'll find out who
>every picture you have belongs to.  I will explicitly tell you to whom
>they all belong.  After that, I expect to see the postings with the
>initials.  IF you ask the authors (and I will check, because you have
>REALLY pissed me off), and they don't mind not having the initials,
that
>is fine.  If you honestly don't know who they belong to, fine.  Only
>ask, and I'll find them, even if no-one else cares about this.
>
>Finally, I would just like to justify my indignation.  One of the ways
I
>define art is this:
>
>Can you recognise the author/painter/sculptor/etc. by their style, when
>you see a new piece of work.  If you can, it is art.  I can mostly
tell,
>now, whether b'ger, jgs, vk, ejm, hjw, etc. drew a picture, so I regard
>it as art.  I feel that initials should be left [in the absence of
>specific aproval by the artist].  No ego trip.  Just respect for the
>artists.
>
>Anyone still not understand where I am coming from, I have one thing to
>say:
>"READ THE FAQ!!!!!".
>
>CU.
>Andy.
>

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

   _
 _(_)_
(_)@(_)
  (_)\
     |
    \|/
  \\\|//jgs
^^^^^^^^^^^

    \\__  o
|\/    o\  o
>       < o
|/\   __/
    //

 |\__/,|   (`\
 |_ _  |.--.) )
 ( T   )     /
(((^_(((/(((_/

  , _ ,
 ( o o )
/'` ' `'\
|'''''''|
|\\'''//|
   """

 ,~~--~~-.
+      | |\
|| |~ |`,/-\
*\_) \_) `-'

 __
 \  \     _ _
  \**\ ___\/ \
X*#####*+^^\_\
  o/\  \
     \__\

Make your own ASCII art

Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.