Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 26 Nov 1999.
 _   _                     _        _             _     _           
| | | |___  ___ _ __   ___| |_     / \   _ __ ___| |__ (_)_   _____ 
| | | / __|/ _ \ '_ \ / _ \ __|   / _ \ | '__/ __| '_ \| \ \ / / _ \
| |_| \__ \  __/ | | |  __/ |_   / ___ \| | | (__| | | | |\ V /  __/
 \___/|___/\___|_| |_|\___|\__| /_/   \_\_|  \___|_| |_|_| \_/ \___|
Word Wrapping

Word Wrapping

alt.ascii-art · 4 messages · 26 Nov 1999 - 27 Nov 1999
Les Scott <les...@mindspring.com> ASCII art 26 Nov 1999 00:00 · permalink · report
I enjoy this group a lot, but have only been reading it a little
while, so this topic may already be old for all of you, but it's
information I need.

I plan to publish an email newsletter soon combining text and ascii
art.  I know that this combination can frequently trigger the word
wrapping feature in many email readers and explode the ascii art.

Does anyone know how many characters popular email readers will
accommodate before they automatically wrap lines?  This info would be
very helpful in choosing appropriate sized art and setting up text
limits so that everything will line up properly in the greatest number
of email readers.

Also, does anyone know of any online resources for doing what I
describe here?

Les



    ==========================__       .+''''+.
   Earthsong Productions    ."  `'+..-'   @>   `.
  and DulcimerWorks     ,, /                     \
 ========              {::] | || | || | | || |===[)
  Les Scott             '' \                     /
   les...@mindspring.com  `+__,+''-,    @>   .'
    ==========================        `+.,,,.+'lhs

Les Scott wrote:
> Does anyone know how many characters popular email readers will
> accommodate before they automatically wrap lines?  This info would be
> very helpful in choosing appropriate sized art and setting up text
> limits so that everything will line up properly in the greatest number
> of email readers.

I have seen the number 72 mentioned a lot of times in this context (I
also think that's where my news reader wraps). Actually I've seen
numbers anywhere between 60 and 80 mentioned, but 72 "stands out"
somehow. Anything over 80 is too much.


-- 
    (,         http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/cgi/asciichat/
    /|__--__                       .                        __--__
    |\ '__                        /|\                        _{ _ 
    `.' / `.,_ _________           |           _________ _,.' (/ `.
    /  ||``._.'             ASCII ART CHAT!             `---'|:||,/
  .'   /|                                                   /|:| \
.'    /\ \         __   __                _                 `/|'\'
 ` `,/ /`,\        \ \ / /__ _ _ ___ _ _ (_)__ __ _         /,'\ \
   .'.'  /|         \ V / -_) '_/ _ \ ' \| / _/ _` |        |\  `.`.
 ,' /   / |          \_/\___|_| \___/_||_|_\__\__,_|        | \   \ `,
- `- -- `-'- -ejm-------------------------------------VK-- -`-' -- -' -

David (drx) Rekowski <dav...@coodex.de> wrote in message news:383...@coodex.de...
> Veronica Karlsson wrote:
> >
> > Les Scott wrote:
> > > Does anyone know how many characters popular email readers will
> > > accommodate before they automatically wrap lines?  This info would be
> > > very helpful in choosing appropriate sized art and setting up text
> > > limits so that everything will line up properly in the greatest number
> > > of email readers.
> >
> > I have seen the number 72 mentioned a lot of times in this context (I
> > also think that's where my news reader wraps). Actually I've seen
> > numbers anywhere between 60 and 80 mentioned, but 72 "stands out"
> > somehow. Anything over 80 is too much.
>
> What I read is that 80 is the point most newsreaders break line. The
> reason for the 72 chars/line is that you can respond to the msg 7/8(?)
> times without line wrapping. This won't help much here, sometime,
> because i've seen posts with at least 10 to 12 responses. :) But IMHO 72
> is the best length.
>
> -David

Gee, if your newsreader won't read at least 132 characters wide, I'd say it's
time to get a real one.

JRO

Veronica Karlsson wrote:
> 
> Les Scott wrote:
> > Does anyone know how many characters popular email readers will
> > accommodate before they automatically wrap lines?  This info would be
> > very helpful in choosing appropriate sized art and setting up text
> > limits so that everything will line up properly in the greatest number
> > of email readers.
> 
> I have seen the number 72 mentioned a lot of times in this context (I
> also think that's where my news reader wraps). Actually I've seen
> numbers anywhere between 60 and 80 mentioned, but 72 "stands out"
> somehow. Anything over 80 is too much.

What I read is that 80 is the point most newsreaders break line. The
reason for the 72 chars/line is that you can respond to the msg 7/8(?)
times without line wrapping. This won't help much here, sometime,
because i've seen posts with at least 10 to 12 responses. :) But IMHO 72
is the best length.

-David

-- 
   ,-.     David (drx) Rekowski
 __'v'__   REM...@coodex.de
///( )\\\  http://www.angelfire.com/de2/disciple/   <-- updated today!
   " "     ICQ: #54438233

About this thread. These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1999 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post