Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 20 May 1996.
Why *is* it called ASCII Art ?
alt.ascii-art
· 5 messages · 20 May 1996 - 30 May 1996
The ASCII.art FAQ mentions that > Before computers, ASCII art was made on typewriters, > teletype machines (5 bit), and was created typographically. There are even > tee-shirts with the :-) smiley. This raises a couple of questions: 1. What was it called when done on typewriters (before ASCII code was invented)? 2. Why is it called ASCII art now? To elaborate: Yes, it was done on typewriters, and I'm sure it was not called ASCII art then. Any when done one teletypes with 5-bit codes, I'm sure it was not called ASCII art. Then, it was done on computers like the IBM 1401, which used 6-bit characters in BCD code. I don't think it was called BCD art then, and it _certainly_ wasn't called ASCII art. Then, when 8-bit machines like the IBM /360 came along, they used EBCDIC code. I don't think it was called EBCDIC art then, and it _certainly_ wasn't called ASCII art. Now, with the prevalence of PCs, using ASCII characters, someone has decided that this character-based art is to be called ASCII art. When you think of it, once the characters are on paper, or even on a screen, the fact that they possibly were orginally stored with 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 bits inside some computer memory has nothing to do with the art itself; so, can someone clarify how the term "ASCII art" came about? And is there any rationale behind the fact that it clearly HAS come about? regards, Ken West
In article <ken...@voyager13.lglobal.com>, Ken West <ken...@lglobal.com> writes >The ASCII.art FAQ mentions that > >> Before computers, ASCII art was made on typewriters, >> teletype machines (5 bit), and was created typographically. There are even >> tee-shirts with the :-) smiley. > >This raises a couple of questions: > >1. What was it called when done on typewriters (before ASCII code was >invented)? Typewriter art. When it was on lineprinters in the 1970s I never heard a specific name, but I suppose it might have been called lineprinter art :-) [those I saw were shading--nudes, Mona Lisa, etc; I have no idea how the images were converted, perhaps manually] > >2. Why is it called ASCII art now? Despite your elegant reasoning, an ASCII file has become synonymous with a 'plain text' file such as text editors edit, without font or layout information and therefore displayed in the standard system (typewriter) font. --Regards, Woof Woof, Glug Glug-- X E M U * Who Drowned theJUDGe's Dog ? s p 4 \ |\ answers on (alt.religion.scientology! /~~~~~~~ @----, ++++++++++++(/x/clam/faq/woofglug.html -;'^';,_,-;^; : : : :http://www.demon.net/castle/x/clam/index.html
On 20 May 1996, Ken West wrote: > The ASCII.art FAQ mentions that > > Before computers, ASCII art was made on typewriters, > > teletype machines (5 bit), and was created typographically. There are even > > tee-shirts with the :-) smiley. > This raises a couple of questions: > 1. What was it called when done on typewriters (before ASCII code was > invented)? Well, according to Andrew Belsey, who posted to this group awhile back, he says that there is a book available called: Typewriter Art, edited by Alan Riddell (London, 1975) ISBN 0-900626-99-2 > > 2. Why is it called ASCII art now? > Now, with the prevalence of PCs, using ASCII characters, someone has > decided that this character-based art is to be called ASCII art. > When you think of it, once the characters are on paper, or even on a > screen, the fact that they possibly were orginally stored with 5 or 6 or > 7 or 8 bits inside some computer memory has nothing to do with the art > itself; so, > can someone clarify how the term "ASCII art" came about? And is there any > rationale behind the fact that it clearly HAS come about? > regards, Ken West It wasn't just someone who popularized the phrase ascii-art. It was all those who voted in alt.config. A year ago I subscribed to alt.config and discovered that 100 votes plus a lot of convincing to create a new Usenet group. I wish I was around to be a lurker back then but hey they made a good vote of it! Maybe Scarecrow knows more about the alt.config story? I don't even know if alt.config is still there? Ahhh break time is over. take care, Jon ____ __,-~~/~ `---. _/_,---( , ) __ / < / ) \___ - ------===;;;'====------------------===;;;===----- - - \/ ~"~"~"~"~"~\~"~)~"/ (_ ( \ ( > \) \_( _ < >_>' ~ `-M' ::>|--" M;|.|.| M;|.|.| wha...@u.washington.edu M;|.|.| See the light..... Jon & Jen having a bad day. <Ii::|i|`. (` ^'"`-' ") ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nuclear Explosion Mushroom by Bill March -------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Why *is* it called ASCII Art ?
ASCII for the art, get the ANSII....hopefully. :)
Pleasant
Pleasant (ple...@snook.com) wrote: : Re: Re: Why *is* it called ASCII Art ? : : ASCII for the art, get the ANSII....hopefully. :) : : Pleasant ASCII stands for the char set used and art is that it is pictures made from it. Like my skulls in my sig made from ASCII chars and are a picture so is ASCII Art. Does that explan things. -- _____ _____ / \ / \ | () () | pdo...@metz.une.edu.au | () () | \ ^ / ___ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ ^ / ||||| | |__| \_/ | | | \_/ ||||| ||||| |___ | \ | |___ |___| _/ \_ |||||
About this thread.
These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1996 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.