Phony addresses

DANG PEOPLE WHO USE FAKE ADDRESSES!!!!

Jeez - I sent a long involved e-mail to one of the more talented
contrubuters here and it bounced back - address unknown.

MUMBLE! 

Nat Hooper
Oxford, Arkansas

> DANG PEOPLE WHO USE FAKE ADDRESSES!!!!
>
> Jeez - I sent a long involved e-mail to one of the more talented
> contrubuters here and it bounced back - address unknown.
>
> MUMBLE!
>
> Nat Hooper
> Oxford, Arkansas
>

Dang SPAMMERS that make us do it!
I don't think I ever said Dang one time in my life.....LOL

take the snot and make it hot.
LOL
Yatty

On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:29:02 -0600, nhoop <nho...@centurytel.net> wrote:

>DANG PEOPLE WHO USE FAKE ADDRESSES!!!!
>
>Jeez - I sent a long involved e-mail to one of the more talented
>contrubuters here and it bounced back - address unknown.
>
>MUMBLE! 
>
>Nat Hooper
>Oxford, Arkansas
>

Well, post who it is that you wish to converse with, and put your real address here
just dont act shocked when your e-mail level jumps up

-- 
                                 
      __.-~---_                  
    __)/ > O  (     MikeChat     
    ) /  /|\ )"        AT        
    ) | ^ ^ ^|      BlueDwarf    
     )_\ ^ ^ (         Dot       
       )\ ^ ^ \        Net       
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
 ~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~  ~~~~~~~~ 

nhoop <nho...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
<s74...@4ax.com>
delivered via newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!feed.centurytel.net
using 209 and Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
> 
> DANG PEOPLE WHO USE FAKE ADDRESSES!!!!
> 
> Jeez - I sent a long involved e-mail to one of the more talented
> contrubuters here and it bounced back - address unknown.
> 
> MUMBLE!
> 
> Nat Hooper
> Oxford, Arkansas

You belong to a pretty select group .
Assuming that you are sincere and not LEA on a mission:

Most people are honest, sincere and decent folk .
The few who are not make life difficult for the rest .
Quoted from another newsgroup
*************************************************
>>To explain how this works, one has to understand
the way spammers choose where to spam. They do not
have a human being reading or monitoring the NG's,
but rely on computers to do this. The computers
play a numbers game, choosing NG's that show heavy
traffic and certain key subject words that the
computer believes are compatible with the model
of what the spammer is looking for. 
This is often referred to as a "spam bot". High
volume is always desirable to them, ergo the
flooding done by regular posters actually attracts
the spammers via their computer bots. I mention this
only to remind everyone that we can easily create
large volumes of spam by carelessness. This NG has
been relatively free of high volume spam, and I
personally would like to see it stay that way. By
keeping flooding by regular posters to a minimum,
we can assure that it will!!!

And let's remember NOT to x-post.

Well, technically, although very annoying, cross-posting does not attract the 
spam bots. The computers look for key words in the subject lines and group 
volume to pick an NG for spamming. They can also gather up email addresses of 
those poor numb twits who would actually use a real email address in Usenet!!!
*************************************************

MiKe®

MiKe� <pei...@lascaux.cave> wrote:

>> Jeez - I sent a long involved e-mail to one of the more talented
>> contrubuters here and it bounced back - address unknown.
>> 
>> MUMBLE!
>> 
>> Nat Hooper
>> Oxford, Arkansas
>
>You belong to a pretty select group .
>Assuming that you are sincere and not LEA on a mission:

I AM sincere. I have no trouble with spam as I use AGENT that's easy to
configure to ignore most spam. also it's an offline reader so I don't
have to sit online to read what's sent to me.

What is "LEA"?

Nat

nhoop a écrit :
> 
> MiKe® <pei...@lascaux.cave> wrote:
> 
> >> Jeez - I sent a long involved e-mail to one of the more talented
> >> contrubuters here and it bounced back - address unknown.
> >>
> >> MUMBLE!
> >>
> >> Nat Hooper
> >> Oxford, Arkansas
> >
> >You belong to a pretty select group .
> >Assuming that you are sincere and not LEA on a mission:
> 
> I AM sincere. I have no trouble with spam as I use AGENT that's easy to
> configure to ignore most spam. also it's an offline reader so I don't
> have to sit online to read what's sent to me.
> 
> What is "LEA"?
> 
> Nat

An abbr. that points out that there are millions
of internet subscribers . The port your msg. came
through is used by others than yourself , many of
whom use forte free agent that is apparently very
easy to configure .

LEA - law enforcement [agent, agency] .

MiKe®

>forte free agent that is apparently very
>easy to configure .

YeahBut it lack some of the necessities of life like the spellchecker.

Nat

> >forte free agent that is apparently very
> >easy to configure .
>
> YeahBut it lack some of the necessities of life like the spellchecker.
>

And the killfile. Gotta have it...LOL

Yatty
8^D

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:35:27 -0600, nhoop <nho...@centurytel.net> wrote:

>>forte free agent that is apparently very
>>easy to configure .
>
>YeahBut it lack some of the necessities of life like the spellchecker.

Blah, just type a bit slower if you make lots of typos.. :-) Or read your
posts before you post them so you can catch those errors.

>Blah, just type a bit slower if you make lots of typos.. :-) Or read your
>posts before you post them so you can catch those errors.

Can't do that! The world needs my messages NOW!

Nat