Re: Modified FAQ for rec.arts.ascii
On 19 Apr 2002 01:21:00 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote: >On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 01:51:12 +0200, Andreas Freise <ad...@mpq.mpg.de> wrote: > >>On 17 Apr 2002 Graham Drabble wrote: >>> As part of the revitalising of rec.arts.ascii I have gone throught the >>> alt.ascii-art FAQ and made some changes to customise it for posting to >>> rec.arts.ascii. It is posted below and you are encouraged to read it >>> and comment. I am particuarly looking for someone to re-do my >>> rec.arts.ascii at the begining. >> Why ? Redo it ? No. Ool an VK put in alot of work into the picture. Why not create something new with the particpants from the group as it gets going. >>[snip] >> >>It wrapped. And I don't quite like what you are doing there. It >>actually is the FAQ for a.a-a and should stay just that. Of course someone >>should add pointers for the new group (probably Colin, since he has >>been working on that thing for a while now). And of course it may be >>posted to r.a.a but I don't see any good reason for changing >>a.a-a to r.a.a in the text. I get the same feeling it is not quite right. >> >>If you want some advertising, good. But don't try to force people >>and action to move from a.a-a to r.a.a. Either that will happen or it >>won't. _I_ for example am rather addicted to _this_ little place >>in Usenet. :) >> A strange, wried, wonderful, place :) > >Maybe a FAQ about how the moderation works, and why it is done that >way, with links to the ASCII Art FAQ site(s) or include the a.a-a >FAQ under the r.a.a > > ____ _____ ____ > _..._ | _ \| ____/ ___| // > ,' `. | |_) | _|| | /X// _ > / \ | _ <| |__| |___ _ (\ //-'// > \`-'\`-'/`/ |_| \_\_____\____(_) / \)---' > `. ; ;.' _ ____ ____ ___ ___ /X// > `.;,' / \ / ___| / ___|_ _|_ _| > \O/ / _ \ \___ \| | | | | | > () / ___ \ ___) | |___ | | | | _ > >> /_/ \_\____/ \____|___|___(_) > _ ____ _____ > / \ | _ \_ _| \O/ > / _ \ | |_) || | ()] > / ___ \| _ < | | || __ > /_/ \_\_| \_\|_| .'"|: .' /; > __......____...---.._ ~O/ : `: / ' > ..--"" .----`. [()\; :/ / > | : : />.' =; / > __________`-----.'---.----' ; .' > .' .' >__ ___ ___..' -' > `---------------._.------''' """ MJP > There is a start. >What is rec.ascii.art > > >How do I post to r.a.a The FAQ does not inform you how to. lgbeard
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,fd2a2aeac2fccacf X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-18 21:58:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: nop...@nospam.nut (LGB) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art Subject: Re: Modified FAQ for rec.arts.ascii Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 04:56:30 GMT Organization: very little.net Message-ID: <3cb...@news.charter.net> References: <Xns...@ID-77355.user.dfncis.de> <g5m...@adfpc.amp.uni-hannover.de> <3cbf62eb.30581445@205.158.27.245> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 X-Complaints-To: new...@supernews.com Lines: 71 Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:16897
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
, _ , ( o o ) /'` ' `'\ |'''''''| |\\'''//| """
,~~--~~-. + | |\ || |~ |`,/-\ *\_) \_) `-'
__
\ \ _ _
\**\ ___\/ \
X*#####*+^^\_\
o/\ \
\__\ .------------. |\\//\\//\\//| |//\\//\\//\\| |\\//\\//\\//| |//\\//\\//\\| '------------'
_______ /` _____ `\;, /__(^===^)__\';, / ::: \ ,; | ::: | ,;' '._______.'`jgs
_ _ (o)(o)--. \../ ( )hjw m\/m--m'`--.
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2002 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.