Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 29 Jun 2001.
Has anyone seen...

Has anyone seen...

I'm trying to get in contact with Rowan Crawford, Normand Veilleux, and 
Joan Stark - haven't been able to contact them through email addresses 
I've found on the net. Anyone know what/where they're up to?

-- 
 ,-.  Henry Segerman
 |/                        
 |,--.  /\  |  /| /"\/"\   |
/|   |  |/ /| / |/ /|  |   |/
 |   \_/\_/ |/  |  \/  `--'|
                          /|
         uewJa6aS hJuaH  `-'

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,bdc00a21b1e35d65,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-29 13:23:27 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!news.ox.ac.uk!not-for-mail
From: Henry Segerman <sjo...@sable.ox.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Has anyone seen...
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:19:45 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Oxford University, England
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <9hint1$mcp$1...@news.ox.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sable.ox.ac.uk
X-Trace: news.ox.ac.uk 993845985 22937 163.1.2.4 (29 Jun 2001 20:19:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: new...@ox.ac.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:19:45 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990927 ("Nine While Nine") (UNIX) (OSF1/V4.0 (alpha))
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:6432
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post