Re: REQUEST:::: explosion
From Andreas Freise <ad...@mpq.mpg.de>
· rec.arts.ascii
· 25 Nov 1997 00:00 · View full thread
· report
jth...@nickel.laurentian.ca wrote: > I'm looking for an ascii picture of an explosion I had one, but i've lost > it, if anyone has one, please email it to me directly since I'm not recieving > posts I don't know what kind of explosion do you want. This for a try. (Find more at my homepage.) ____ __,-~~/~ `---. _/_,---( , ) __ / < / ) \___ - ------===;;;'====------------------===;;;===----- - - \/ ~"~"~"~"~"~\~"~)~"/ (_ ( \ ( > \) \_( _ < >_>' ~ `-i' ::>|--" I;|.|.| <|i::|i|`. (` ^'"`-' ") ------------------------------------------------------------------ Nuclear Explosion Mushroom. by Bill March Hope that helps. :) Andreas _ | Ascii Dictionary (Collection, Links, ...) | o | http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~freise | o <<.|_ _| < > |\ | Alt.Ascii-Art FAQ : http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~freise/ascii/faq.html
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,69575680d2aa1756 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public From: Andreas Freise <ad...@mpq.mpg.de> Subject: Re: REQUEST:::: explosion Date: 1997/11/25 Message-ID: <ber...@netcom.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 292755401 Sender: ber...@netcom15.netcom.com Organization: Netcom On-Line Services Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
rec.arts.ascii
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.