Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 26 Mar 2002.
Re: Moo

Re: Moo

From LGB <nop...@nospam.nut> · alt.ascii-art · 26 Mar 2002 20:43 · View full thread · report
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:59:16 GMT, el_...@ispdr.net.au (Bruce Greenwood) wrote:

>
>    .   .     ___
>   /(   |\   /   \
>  |  \__/ | ( MOO )
>  |       |  \  _/
>   \ () ()|   |/
>    \     |  _/
>     \  __| 
> E_Z  \/__/ 
>
>A cow's head. In fifteen seconds. (It was going to be Hagar the
>Horrible, instead of a horrible cow.)

chuckle :)

This is a horrible head of Hager :)

            )`
       .--./ |
  .'\_/    `./
  |  '\ __.-'-.
  `--'-' .o'o'`.
     ///   .''.
       \`._'..'
 LGB    `--`


lgbeard

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,e8473660ffeff438
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-26 12:44:32 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: nop...@nospam.nut (LGB)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Moo
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 20:43:00 GMT
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <3ca...@news.charter.net>
References: <3c9...@news.ispdr.net.au>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
X-Complaints-To: new...@supernews.com
Lines: 30
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:16284

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2002 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post