Re: Random Dot Stereograms
From Admiral Jota <jot...@laraby.tiac.net>
· alt.ascii-art
· 8 Oct 1996 00:00 · View full thread
· report
Jonathan Hunter <mch...@afs.mcc.ac.uk> writes: >Hi! >Are there any ASCII gurus out there willing to try and make an ASCII >RDS? :-) >I'm sure we'd all be /very/ impressed if anybody can manage it! Well, it's not particularly easy to get decent resolution in ASCII using just dots. I have seen some nice SIRTS before -- Single-Image Random Text Stereograms. These use a field of random characters as their background. Much more common are normal SITS -- Single-Image Text Stereograms. These are stereographic ASCII line drawings. I've drawn a couple of the latter myself, but my lack of talen at ASCII in general prevented them from being very good :) -- /<-= -=-=- -= Admiral Jota =- -=-=- =->\ __/><-=- http://www.tiac.net/users/jota/ =-><\__ \><-= jot...@mv.mv.com -- Finger for PGP =-></ \<-=- -= -=- -= -==- =- -=- =- -=->/
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,41924c61f7fe39e6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: jot...@laraby.tiac.net (Admiral Jota) Subject: Re: Random Dot Stereograms Date: 1996/10/08 Message-ID: <jot...@laraby.tiac.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 188114045 references: <325...@afs.mcc.ac.uk> organization: The Internet Access Company, Inc. newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1996 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.