Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 16 May 1999.
Re: REQ: clams?

Re: REQ: clams?

>Message-id: <373...@news.easystreet.com>

>Here are some clams and other shells I found. I did not make any of
>them, and if they don't have initials then I found them that way.
>
>By Joan Stark (jgs):

thanks Clover for posting the shell pics that
I made...  I do have more sealife pics at my
site too (Aquatic page under animals)...

Here is another clam-like pic:
         _..._
       .'     '.
      /_.=._.=._\
      \  \   /  /
   jgs '.__.__.'

However, it also looks close to a set of lips...

         _   _
       .' `"` '.
      /_       _\
      \ `--`--` /
   jgs '.__.__.'


:)
-joan
--
                __      _,,
               /_ \    sSSSs
               \_\(    s\_SS          joan stark
             (\/`"`\___/`"`\/)        spu...@juno.com
              \/)-(`-'-')=(\/
               /___\    |__\ /\       ASCII ART GALLERY:
               //||__   ||\\//`       http://www.ascii-art.com
               \\'--.)   \\``
           jgs (/        (/

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,1de30996109e81a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: spu...@aol.comQQ (Spunk1111)
Subject: Re: REQ: clams?
Date: 1999/05/16
Message-ID: <199...@ng-cj1.aol.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 478502689
References: <373...@news.easystreet.com>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
X-Admin: new...@aol.com
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1999 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post