Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 24 Jun 1998.
Re: Netly News article

Re: Netly News article

.----- On Tue, 23 Jun 1998 22:53:51 +1200, Matthew Thomas posted:
|   _
|  /_/\   Matthew Thomas, who wasn't interviewed by anyone :-)
| _\_\/_  http://cantua.canterbury.ac.nz/~mpt26/ (Site for sore eyes)
|/_/\/_/\ ASCII ART FAQ: http://cantua.canterbury.ac.nz/~mpt26/art/ascii/
|\_\/\_\/ <-- If this looks weird, you should be using a fixed-width font
|
|PS: As you can see, I have my own Web site now, complete with ASCII FAQ!
|Don't everyone rush at once looking for pictures there, though, because
|I have exactly THREE pictures on-site ...
'---------------------------

Can I nab it for my website... the copy I have is a bit outa date!

http://vibes.vossnet.co.uk/i/ighaig/ascfaq.htm


|\/| _..__|_o._   /\_|_| o._  _   mart.atkins@--
|  |(_||  |_|| | /--\|_|<|| |_>            --bigfoot.com

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,92804ab342edc95b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: zne...@ovtsbbg.pbz (Martin Atkins)
Subject: Re: Netly News article
Date: 1998/06/24
Message-ID: <359...@news.vossnet.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 365705808
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.117.152.68
References: <1db...@jorn.pr.mcs.net> <358...@spamfree.land>
Organization: "Cable Internet (post doesn't reflect views of Cable Internet)"
Reply-To: zne...@ovtsbbg.pbz
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post