Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 25 May 1997.
Re: Frogstein and Birdstein, High Praise

Re: Frogstein and Birdstein, High Praise


PeteCasso (pet...@aol.com) writes:
> Well, that's it for the beginning of a worldwide "Frogstein and Birdstein"
> emulation craze!

"worldwide"?  Does everything have to be expressed in such grandiose terms?

>           Blessed are those with little abilities
>          since they will edit the work of others!

Little abilities?  I'm so disappointed that the items at
http://www.fiction.org/www/stuff/ weren't to your liking...

>         Or ... are they in reality ascii vandals?

Whatever you say, Mr. "alligatorstein".
--
Tim Park (ad5...@freenet.carleton.ca) # RANCO Shampoo Rep / OSMC Parapara Rep
Member of the #ShAS#: Shampoo Appreciation Society - Our favourite femaline!
World Wide Woozle: http://www.fiction.org/www/ -----------------------------

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b1298810e41a38bf
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: ad5...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Tim Park)
Subject: Re: Frogstein and Birdstein, High Praise
Date: 1997/05/25
Message-ID: <5m8kt0$ln...@freenet-news.carleton.ca>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 243746879
References: <199...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
X-Given-Sender: ad5...@freenet2.carleton.ca (Tim Park)
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Reply-To: ad5...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Tim Park)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post