Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 20 Jan 1999.
Re: test

Re: test

On Sun, 10 Jan 1999 21:38:04 GMT, Martin Atkins (zne...@ovtsbbg.pbz) wrote:
: .----- On Fri, 8 Jan 1999 07:01:27 +0000, tin...@la.dipsy.po (Medical
: Catastrophe) posted:
: |Proposal: alt.test.ascii-art

: alt.ascii-art.test
: alt.ascii-art.animation.js
: alt.ascii-art.animation.pgdown
: alt.ascii-art.animation.ansi
: alt.ascii-art.coloured
: alt.ascii-art.coloured.html

: Just an idea... Comments?

You forgot alt.ascii-art.flame - we've certainly got enough of those..
(Obvious subgroups not mentioned to avoid offending certain people.)

For the quick-reacting and/or humor-impaired: The above was sarcasm.

-- 
<-- Ilmari Karonen --><-- http://www.sci.fi/~iltzu/ --><-- ilt...@sci.fi -->
"I am a student at UC Berkeley, and I am taking this class where we have to
go to a news group and ask an 'intelligent question'."  -- a luser in a.a-a

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,d5bae8e4333457c3
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: ilt...@sci.fi (Ilmari Karonen)
Subject: Re: test
Date: 1999/01/20
Message-ID: <784u8l$bps$1...@tron.sci.fi>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 434844880
Distribution: world
References: <915...@news.demon.co.uk> <369...@on.spammer> <1dl...@modem-113.tin.dialup.pol.co.uk> <369...@news.vossnet.net>
Organization: (dis)Order of the Holy Spoon (or whatever)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1999 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post