Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 6 Sep 1998.
Re: 5th Anniversary of alt.ascii-art (6)

Re: 5th Anniversary of alt.ascii-art (6)

On Sat, 05 Sep 1998 21:51:47 GMT, Pete Casso <pet...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>Colin Douthwaite wrote:
>> Then we have seen the emergence of Pete Casso with his creation of a
>> new subgenre of "Stein Characters", second only to the well-known
>> "Silly Cows" genre in Ascii Art, and by far outstripping the other
>> known genres of Sheep; Owls; Koala Bears, and Luke the Spook.

>Does the above formulation not contain disparaging words?

Not in my view but evidently in yours.

>-> The 'steins are cartoons (encompassing pics, naming, story lines)
>   and not a subgenre of anything else. The 'steins are cartoons with
>   their own unique style. The simplest neutral wording here, 
>   is "Pete Casso created the 'steins."

>-> The cow collection is generally known as such, but you compared
>   the 'steins with the "Silly Cows"
>                         ^^^^^

I suggest you read the Ascii Art section of "The New Hacker's Dictionary"
edited by Eric Raymond.

>Perhaps you may want to edit out the offending words.

Not really, they were not intended or written to be offensive.

>On a more fundamental note, I don't think that you can compare the 'steins
>which are cartoons, with the cows, etc which are basically picture collections
>(with perhaps with the occasional cartoon in them.) I think you need to
>compare apples with apples, i.e. cartoons with cartoons.

I was not aiming at comparisons but showing that other subgenres of
Ascii Art characters have appeared in the past. No one seems to have
mentioned them previously in historical notes about alt.ascii-art.

>You compared in the above quote apples with oranges, i.e. cartoon with picture
>collections, but I am nevertheless curious, what measures did you take in
>making your comparisons in the above quote?

See above. I was not intentionally making comparisons.

I posted this article on recent ascii art history on 17th August, in
advance of its inclusion in this Anniversary posting. There were one or
two comments from people at that time but I think you must have missed
seeing my August 17 posting...that happens with the known unreliability
of Net propogation. So you failed to comment on my article at that time.
However, had you done so, I would probably have answered you in a 
similar way.

Bye,

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fd588,6e978a90f5275fac
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd588,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,6e978a90f5275fac
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: cfb...@southern.co.nz (Colin Douthwaite)
Subject: Re: 5th Anniversary of alt.ascii-art (6)
Date: 1998/09/06
Message-ID: <35f...@news.southern.co.nz>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 388329282
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <905...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <35F...@sympatico.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Southern InterNet Services
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: cfb...@southern.co.nz
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.ascii-art.animation
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post