Re: Tux the Penguin

Ool <Ulr...@t-online.de> wrote in message news:8a0v9k$n18$1...@news05.btx.dtag.de...
> > Ilmari Karonen (ilt...@sci.fi.invalid) wrote:
> > > In article <89dsvf$83u$1...@kujawiak.man.lodz.pl>, Przemyslaw Brojewski wrote:

> > > >       .-.
> > > >       oo|
> > > >      /`'\
> > > >     (\_;/)

> > > That's just.. perfect!

> It's very cool.  Walking around at the CeBIT last week and seeing the
> real thing (logo, I mean) I was wondering:  Wouldn't this be even bet-
> ter?

>        .-.
>        oo|
>       /`'\
>      {\_;/}

> (Curly brackets for the webbed feet, I mean.)

One foot is also pointing up while the other one is facing to the
side.  That and Tux is resting the left arm on the left foot.

        ,-.
        oo|
       /`'~)
      {\"_|/

Whether this version is actually an improvement is debatable.  But I
guess we can all agree leaving well enough alone is out of the ques-
tion.


        ,-.
        oo|
       /`'~)
      {\"_|7


*Sigh!*

Let's call it a day...


--
  __    "Muscles of All Limbs, Unite!                             __
('__`>              You Have Nothing to Lose But Your Sinews."  <'__`)
// -(   �OOL mm                                                  )^ \\
`\__/   http://home.t-online.de/home/ulrich.schreglmann/00L.htm  \-_/'