Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 25 Jan 1998.
Re: How about some smaller ascii?

Re: How about some smaller ascii?

Rdbyrne wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>                                            (O)   (O)
>                                                 @
>                                               {    }
>                                                 U        - woof!

RTFF!

It appears that the above ascii image was done in a proportional font,
most likeley the one used in AOL's message window.

Read the FAQs to find out how to fix this.

On the other hand, if it was done in a fixed width font, read the FAQs
for info on how to make better pictures.....


Sorry if I sound rude, it's a dirty job, but somebody needs to do it...
:-)


-- 
--ran...@slip.net  (Randy Gardner)
--http://www.slip.net/~randyg/index.htm  - *New*  Download a maze
  program that lets you actually walk *inside* the maze!!

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,fc807e1ec23ae362
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: Randy Gardner <ran...@slip.net>
Subject: Re: How about some smaller ascii?
Date: 1998/01/25
Message-ID: <34C...@slip.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 319382933
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: The large stack method     (CEO:  Rsoft)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: ran...@slip.net
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post