Re: Silky terrier
Joris Bellenger wrote: >Spunk1111 wrote: >> In article <33a...@news.terrigal.net.au>, >> zak...@terrigal.net.au writes: >> >Has anyone got a silky terrier in their art collection >> I don't think I would know a silky terrier if it came up and bit me! >> I have many, many dogs on my homepage... here's one that might >> fit your request: >> >> >> .--. .--. >> / /\ ". _......_ ." /\ \ >> / / ` ` \ \ >> ( ( /' _ __ `\ ) ) >> \ /| /0} {0\\ |\ / >> ` | / \/// | ` >> \ \ / \ / / >> `\ \| .==. |/ /' >> `\\.' \ / './/' >> jgs /`'._-^^-_.'`\ >> `""` >This is good Joan, damn good! >You could make a great bear of it too. Indeed. .--. .--. / /\ "..----.." /\ \ / / / \ \ \ ( ( / _ _ \ ) ) \ ' /0} {0\ ' / | / \ | \ / \ / `\ | .==. | /' `\\.' \ / './/' jgs `'._-^^-_.'` `""` -Karl Patience comes to those who wait. -- To contact me by e-mail, remove all X's from my e-mail address.
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,5bae257a78edb7b5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Xka...@POBoxes.comX (Karl) Subject: Re: Silky terrier Date: 1997/06/26 Message-ID: <33b...@news.supernews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 252899291 References: <33a...@news.terrigal.net.au> <199...@ladder02.news.aol.com> <33A...@xs4all.nl> Organization: Bah, organization's overrated Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.