Re: What happened to Tran's ASCII farts?
pat wrote: >I re-visited the group after an extended absence, and what >a disappointment: no more daily ascii farts. > >Is it known what happened to Tran and why he stopped posting? You can still see new "farts" on http://www.asciiartfarts.com/ -- | Harry Mason | .------------. | .___, |"Whatever you do will be | | University of | | hjm200 @ | | ___('v')___ | insignificant. However, | | Southampton | | zepler.net | | `"-\._./-"' | it is vitally important | | England | '------------' | hjm ^ ^ | that you do it." Gandhi |
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,1b564d3c3b0eeb63 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-14 08:42:18 PST Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art From: Harry Mason <spa...@no.spam> Subject: Re: What happened to Tran's ASCII farts? References: <b7d...@4ax.com> <r3i...@4ax.com> Message-ID: <slr...@klf.ecs.soton.ac.uk> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux) NNTP-Posting-Host: klf.ecs.soton.ac.uk Date: 14 Feb 2004 16:42:05 GMT X-Trace: 14 Feb 2004 16:42:05 GMT, klf.ecs.soton.ac.uk Lines: 13 Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!skynet.be!peer.news.eu-x.com!server2.netnews.ja.net!news-spool.soton.ac.uk!news.ecs.soton.ac.uk!klf.ecs.soton.ac.uk Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:1284
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2004 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.