Re: Anybody got a gecko?
From Totto <on....@rot.mapson.sdrawkcab.daer>
· alt.ascii-art
· 17 Jun 1997 00:00 · View full thread
> attn mass mailers: > It is unlawful to use this email address for unsolicited commercial email > per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227. I assess a US $500 charge for > reviewing & deleting each unsolicited commercial email. Sending > unsolicited > commercial email to my email address denotes acceptance of these terms. My > posting messages to UseNet neither grants consent to receiving nor is > intended to solicit commercial email. Does this work? I'd assume that the mailers ignore it and that you bust your a$$ trying to trace it and fail... I have a somewhat similar I use in my .sigs (WHEN I haven't fucked up my email reply addie like here that is :) and it has not slowed down the barrage of spam, nor have I figured out how to receive my rightful money ;) Totto
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,7f8eaf0cae195014 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Totto <on....@rot.mapson.sdrawkcab.daer> Subject: Re: Anybody got a gecko? Date: 1997/06/17 Message-ID: <33A...@rot.mapson.sdrawkcab.daer>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 249267306 References: <199...@ladder02.news.aol.com> Organization: none Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.