Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 3 Sep 2004.
Re: Colin The Owl, episode 3

Re: Colin The Owl, episode 3

Bertrand Mollinier Toublet <ber...@enst-bretagne.fr> wrote in message news:<2pp...@uni-berlin.de>...
> mr_twig wrote:
> > www.colintheowl.com
> > 
> Colin, buddy, your master mr_twig has his HTML/CSS skills all f*cked-up. 
> If you want to look good with a monospace font (which is pretty 
> important for a goddamn ASCII-art owl), you need to modify your CSS so 
> that the generic font name for the 'font-family' property is 'monospace' 
> and not 'monospaced'.
> 
> You're welcome...

Ahahaha! Whoops... ,my bad.  Cheers dude.

Original message headers
X-Google-Thread: f996b,3e17be785f7537ea
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
From: mr_...@colintheowl.com (mr_twig)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Colin The Owl, episode 3
Date: 3 Sep 2004 02:36:42 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <4de...@posting.google.com>
References: <4de...@posting.google.com> <2pp...@uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.245.36.73
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1094204203 7999 127.0.0.1 (3 Sep 2004 09:36:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: gro...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:36:43 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: g2news1.google.com alt.ascii-art:1222
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2004 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post