Re: dog or cow?
From Hayley Jane Wakenshaw <flu...@quadrant.xs4all.nl>
· alt.ascii-art
· 6 Aug 1997 00:00 · View full thread
· report
fra...@usa.net (francis3) writes: >Anyone have a small dog or cow for my sig??? >Thanks in advance. >francis3. I know these are a little bit too big for a sig, but you could maybe tweak them? -=Puppies=- __ ,. ," ,`-o (_( ( | _,' \ `-' `-' (__ ( O `--.' /) .__,`--~' (( ( hjw `''' __ o-'. ". ,. `. | ) )_) __) `-' `-' / ".-- ) `~--'.__, (\ hjw ) )) ``` __ , ," e`-o (( ( | _,' \\~--' `-'/ ( / /) .___. ) (( ( (( ( hjw ``-' ``-' _ , ," e`--o (( ( | __,' \\~----------------' \_;/ ( / /) ._______________. ) (( ( (( ( ``-' ``-' hjw (|_|) )"( { Y } )=( /) ( )// ( )|( ) hjw m(m|m)m `97 *hugs* flump
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,64f1f17573939246 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: flump*no_spam*@quadrant.xs4all.nl (Hayley Jane Wakenshaw) Subject: Re: dog or cow? Date: 1997/08/06 Message-ID: <715...@hugbear.NL.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 262627481 References: <33d...@news.interbusiness.it> CrackedBy: ShaG-raT^DC X-Complaints-To: use...@news.NL.net X-Trace: news.NL.net 870877150 4073 (None) 193.79.46.1 Organization: Prozac Poppers' Party Society Reply-To: flump*no_spam*@quadrant.xs4all.nl (Hayley Jane Wakenshaw) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.