Re: sigs (was Re: Minor change in the F.A.Q. Please read.)

Whoa. Someone help me, I've gone and lost my compiler. I would be
greatly appreciative if you could compile it and post it somewhere for
us poor little lost sheep. ;}

--
thank you for reading my message
                            __    __  o
please remove *remove me*  /  \/\/  \/
from my e-mail address     \__/\/\__/\o
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . /\ . ./\
             |            |
/\| /\| |/ /\| | / /\| |/ |/ /\
\/| \/| |  \/| |/  \/| |  |\ \/
HEY SPAMMER-BOY, SUCK THIS!
tos...@aol.com
tos...@aol.com
tos...@aol.com
tos...@aol.com
web...@juno.com
web...@aol.com
Veronica Karlsson wrote in message <347...@on.spammer>...
>aardvarko wrote:
>>
>> Hmmmmm... that's a pretty good idea. Is that a standard newsreader
>> feature? And if so, what's the point? OE4 only lets you unscramble,
not
>> scramble.
>>
>
>Yes, it's standard. I seem to remember reading somewhere that it could
>be used for text that contained something that might offend somebody,
>that way only those who want to read it can read it and nobody has to
>accidentally read something he/she doesn't want to read... The coding
is
>just there to "blur" the text for the human eye...
>
>This little C program will "scramble"/"unscramble" text for you:
>
>
>#include <stdlib.h>
>#include <stdio.h>
>
>main()
>{
>  int ch;
>
>  while ((ch = getchar()) != EOF)
>    {
>      if ((ch >= 65) && (ch <= 90))
> {
>   ch = 65 + ((ch - 65) + 13) % 26;
> }
>      if ((ch >= 97) && (ch <= 122))
> {
>   ch = 97 + ((ch - 97) + 13) % 26;
> }
>      printf("%c", ch);
>    }
>}
>
>
>--
>     _    ____  _         _    _   _      _   _
>__ _| |__/ __ \| |_  _ __| |__| | | |_  _| |_| |_    ___ ___
>\ V / / / / _` | | || / _` / _` |_| | || |  _| ' \ _(_-</ -_)
> \_/|_\_\ \__,_|_|\_,_\__,_\__,_(_)_|\_,_|\__|_||_(_)__/\___|
>         \____/            uggc://jjj.yhqq.yhgu.fr/~ix/arjf/
>   LIKE MY SIG? GO HERE: http://www.surfplaza.com/figlet/