Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 19 Oct 1998.
Re: ascii pics

Re: ascii pics

 Martin Atkins <zne...@ovtsbbg.pbz> writes
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  ASCII ART NOT LOOKING RIGHT? READ THIS!
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
[][ hi ...

please may i ask if you can put a datestamp at the top also ?
... if its not been updated i then needn't scroll thru' it ...
yes ... i'm lazy :)

        _          _          _        _
      .' `.      .' `.      .' `.    .' `.    .'`'._    _.-'`'-._
  ,,.'     `.,,.'     `.,,.'     `'"`     `'"`      `'"`         `'"`      

wiggly line
19oct98

[][ see yuz
[][ colin
-- 
( () /_ / /\)   _/   /? .\ /\) /) .\ /_ /_
CJRandall http://www.shieldwolf.demon.co.uk

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,5504cc1bf8f20100
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: CJRandall <col...@shieldwolf.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: ascii pics
Date: 1998/10/19
Message-ID: <Zlc...@shieldwolf.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 402966123
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: shieldwolf.demon.co.uk:193.237.26.148
References: <01bdf60d$6fcdadc0$7404c5c3@r2s9u9> <362...@news.vossnet.net>
X-Complaints-To: abu...@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 908834522 nnrp-11:4676 NO-IDENT shieldwolf.demon.co.uk:193.237.26.148
Organization: me? organised?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post