Re: Impossible shape.
From Nana <tss...@freenet.calgary.ab.ca>
· alt.ascii-art
· 6 Jun 1997 00:00 · View full thread
· report
Under normal circumstances I'd agree, but in this case I don't believe the
shape guy was talking about was an original ascii creation, he may have
ascii-fied it, but I'm sure it's an old optical illusion. Maybe in this
case an "Inspired by" might be appropriate if you REALLY feel you need to
give credit?
-Nana
On 5 Jun 1997, Spunk1111 wrote:
> >I liked this shape so much that I reduced it to use in my sig file.
> >Even though the shading was lost in the reduction, I like it.
> >I'm a newcomer to this forum. Please tell me, should I put someone's
> >initials on the shape in my sig file or can I just use it as is?
>
> It depends on whether or not you created it. If you didn't, you ought to
> give
> credit where credit is due... if you know who did make it.
> That is the polite way to do it.
> -joan
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,41e3d564fa129966,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Nana <tss...@freenet.calgary.ab.ca> Subject: Re: Impossible shape. Date: 1997/06/06 Message-ID: <5nammd$p9...@ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 246898669 References: <339...@news.exit109.com> <199...@ladder02.news.aol.com> Organization: Calgary Free-Net Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.