Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 30 Jul 1994.
Re: PARASITES INSIDE OF VIRUSES?

Re: PARASITES INSIDE OF VIRUSES?

In article <31bp9n$a1...@riscsm.scripps.edu>
ant...@scripps.edu writes:

> In article <31bdjr$pp...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, <Lud...@dartmouth.edu> 
> 
> writes:
>    When we find viruses inside of viruses, that feat will propell
> > virology and biotechnology to newer heights. 
> 
> It's been done, Ludi--quite some time ago.  There are some hazzardds, you 
> 
> see, with making such bold statements when you don't know the facts.
> 
> -tony

   First things first. Colin Douthwaite, our resident artist did a
wonderful illustration to my logical complaints against the reports of
George Smoot and company. Pictures speak a thousand words and the
artistry sort of brought that logic to life. I think that even George
Smoot himself, after reading those logic complaints illustrated with
pictures can "begin to perceive the errors of his ways". 
   PU, PLuto, blesses the soul of Colin Douthwaite to The Fields of
Elysium. ATOM
   I am asking for someone in alt.ascii-art to please do a logarithmic
spiral as best they can. And there is something very mathwise pleasing
in this "work of a logarithmic spiral". In a given area, there is one
maximum-best art work. This might be the first math proof which has a
profound word to say about art. Within a given area of the computer
screen there is one and only one best artwork of the logarithmic
spiral. One maximally-best and the other attempts will be inferior
artwork. I think some friends over in sci.math can help me out in
stating this math theorem precisely. And, if someone posts a logarthmic
spiral, I would please like their permission to use it without
reference for my work on superdeterminism. So please post that the
spiral can be used-without-permission. Thanks in advance.
   Back to sci.bio. I need that logarithmic spiral to push the idea of
superdeterminism. And I aim to link chemistry with biology, in order to
show how highly predictive biology is. Once biology uses the correct
science of superdeterminism, and not the fake-baloney of evolution.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107c0a,299d0bc3500e024c
X-Google-Attributes: gid107c0a,public
X-Google-Thread: f4886,dbda22a9ac78d3f2
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4886,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ffde,299d0bc3500e024c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ffde,public
X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,535e80416e502a8c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,535e80416e502a8c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-30 22:51:52 PST
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!rtp.vnet.net!news1.digex.net!lynx.unm.edu!nntp.sunbelt.net!udel!gatech!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!think.com!hsdndev!dartvax.dartmouth.edu!Ludwig.Plutonium
From: Lud...@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium)
Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.chem,alt.ascii-art,sci.math
Subject: Re: PARASITES INSIDE OF VIRUSES?
Date: 30 Jul 1994 19:18:10 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <31e91i$5f...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
References: <317b4o$4p...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
 <317jrc$al...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <318qce$fn...@jac.zko.dec.com> 
 <31bdjr$pp...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>  <31bp9n$a1...@riscsm.scripps.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: at-sn-184.dartmouth.edu
X-Posted-From: InterNews 1....@dartmouth.edu
Xref: bga.com sci.bio:4865 sci.chem:7369 alt.ascii-art:10726 sci.math:17228
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post