Re: SMile
From Veronica Karlsson <e93...@nospam.sm.luth.se>
· alt.ascii-art
· 7 Jul 1997 00:00 · View full thread
· report
llizard wrote: > > In article <199...@zetnet.co.uk>, Ian Brown > <ian...@zetnet.co.uk>wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I have just started up a web pages about smileys, could you give it > > your opinion and add a few smileys, I will update it weekly once I > > get a few more smileys. > > www.users.zetnet.co.uk/ianb/ > > > > Thanks A lot > > > > Ian Brown > > ??? > > ___ /\ > _/ | ===%^, Ummm, Where are the smileys? > |_____| \/> > --- == > > [_____] __>,^ > | | //| | > > I only see dragons ballooning. What do you mean? There are plenty of smileys! (but no dragons, what _do_ you mean???) :) -- :) Veronica Karlsson ( e93...@sm.luth.se http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ) ( llizard's fanclub: http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/llpages )
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,74a8c07834dc591d X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Veronica Karlsson <e93...@nospam.sm.luth.se> Subject: Re: SMile Date: 1997/07/07 Message-ID: <33C...@nospam.sm.luth.se>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 255273452 References: <199...@zetnet.co.uk> <33B...@freent.toronto.on.ca> Organization: Junk e-mail gladly reported (I have got credit for chucking several spammers out of their accounts) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.